![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#541
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good work. Now stay in there and fight to put a SR in front of that VP. I
know you can do it. Arthur Kramer Sorry but I am a retired, retired triple dipper 35 years with the AF but too young for social security. So I think I will just continue to watch the kids throw sand on one another in this here sandbox, and sell stuff on Ebay. |
#542
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:35:10 -0700, Mary Shafer
wrote: On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:36:59 -0600, Ed Rasimus wrote: The T-38 has been a great airplane for 42 years of training and with the upgraded glass cockpit looks like it will be active in SUPT for another 20 years at least. I have a friend who went from F-18s and SR-71s to T-38s (Bs, I think) That doesn't track. Was he on USN exchange? Was he flying "company" SR-71? If he was USAF it isn't likely that he would have been flying either, but then how did he get to T-38s? The only "B" models are AT-38s, which are only flown by the SUPT fighter-leadin squadron. The NASA, ATC/UPT Talons are all "A" models. with conventional cockpits. He sure missed the HUD at first. I don't think he realized how much difference it made to him. I could have told him, though, because having a HUD greatly improves my piloting, so think of what it does for a real pilot. Did the SR-71 get a HUD? Dunno what there would be to see out the window. Does the T-38 glass cockpit have a HUD? NASA did a cockpit upgrade on the JSC T-38s, but I'm pretty sure it didn't include a HUD. The glass mod does include a HUD. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#543
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Bush Flew Fighter Jets During Vietnam
From: (SteveM8597) Date: 7/20/2004 7:18 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Good work. Now stay in there and fight to put a SR in front of that VP. I know you can do it. Arthur Kramer Sorry but I am a retired, retired triple dipper 35 years with the AF but too young for social security. So I think I will just continue to watch the kids throw sand on one another in this here sandbox, and sell stuff on Ebay. Yup. Ebay is fun. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#544
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#545
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would this be the Senate that contained something like 45-50
Democrats? None of whome could be inveigled into signing on? Yeah, that's weird, isn't it? Tom Dashchle (sp) directed that no senator sign. Walt What are we talking about? It'd be nice if enough of the original topic had been retained so that we wouldn't have to ask. George Z. Sorry. the subject was the certification of Florida electors in 2000. Walt |
#546
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
The procedure which MIGHT get a spin was full aft stick at max rate. But, it had to be done after a nose down unload excursion at nearly max rate as well. So, pump the nose down hard then quickly reverse and bang the pole back into your lap. This had to be done in an inverted position, as I remember it, in order to get that last bit of pitch excursion -- from full nose up (inverted) to max rate nose down in order to get the Talon to spin. I never wanted to walk home, so I wouldn't know from personal experience. Jack |
#547
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(long Snip)
We taught rudder rolls, over/under, loaded/unloaded, with or without full aileron deflection. No spins. We taught gun defense jinking as: 1.) check airspeed to be sure you're below corner velocity, 2.) now plant the stick in random corners of the cockpit at full speed. 3.) lather, rinse, repeat. No spins. It just won't spin. Run it straight up to zero airspeed, put in full rudder and max aileron--no spins. It simply swaps ends. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 The T-38 dash one used to read "If the aircraft is allowed to enter a stabilized spin loss of the aircraft and crew is probable." If I remember correctly it took the Northrup test pilots several weeks to learn how to make it spin. Fortunately their aircraft were equiped with recovery chutes. Howard Austin -- -- Howard Austin none |
#548
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"WalterM140" wrote in message
... But I'd like you to provide a quote that the NYT said what you suggest. "The NYT said what I suggest." -- Charlie Springer So you don't have a source. Walt I can't believe you missed the multiple reports by every legitimate media source confirming that Bush won legitimately, but here is the requested link anyway: http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/recount/ Jarg |
#549
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WalterM140" wrote in message ... Would this be the Senate that contained something like 45-50 Democrats? None of whome could be inveigled into signing on? Yeah, that's weird, isn't it? Tom Dashchle (sp) directed that no senator sign. Walt What are we talking about? It'd be nice if enough of the original topic had been retained so that we wouldn't have to ask. George Z. Sorry. the subject was the certification of Florida electors in 2000. Walt So, the comment about Daschle would have referred to something like what Denny Hastert did with the discharge petition for the vote on concurrent receipt which got only ONE Republican vote from the entire House? Or doesn't one size fit all when it comes to politics.....nasty when the Dems do it in the Senate, but OK when the Repubs do it in the House? Sounds like a case of the whines to me. George Z. |
#550
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
As for the paint job, if his is the one that's been seen on several TV commercials, it's done in gloss while the Aggressor T-38s were all flat. This was on a cover for Plane & Pilot or something similar around 1990. You are right it was gloss, I thought it was blue/gray/white but it may have been just blue& white. Medium sized N-number on the side. It may well have been sold & repainted since then. I do recall that Thornton was the first private T-38, though. The Nellis T-38 Aggressors came in all colors including the basic white as well as blues, grays, browns and "lizard." I have an older book about Red Flag that shows a bunch of different Agressor color schemes - some are Rooskie knockoffs, and some appear to be improvised. Most look pretty effective. We got them all at Holloman while I was there. Over the NM desert, the most effective was the brown. I heard the worst was painted like a bruised banana for a while - it was supposed to be a modified Snake scheme that went awry. Eventually they repainted it so people wouldn't tally it from so far away. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 196 | June 14th 04 11:33 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |