![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Thomas ) writes:
George Shirley wrote in message news: Most grunts referred to officers "advancing their careers" by serving a tour or part of a tour as "getting their ticket punched." Had to get a least some combat time for advancement. Many officers were there because that was the only war we had at the time and war means promotions, officer or enlisted lifer. And why is this a bad thing? 'Cause it played havoc with unit morale and combat effectiveness. To provide a maximum number of "ticket punches", most officers spent only six months or less with the combat battlions - the rest of their tours were spent as laundry and morale office at some rear echelon headquarters unit. Just about the time an officer was really learning to get good at his job, he'd be rotated out and a new inexperienced "ticket puncher" would be assigned in his place. To repeat the learning curve. I'd venture to say that most of the officers who volunteered to serve in SEA did so, not to save the USA from the Communist hordes, but because it was, indeed, "the only war we had"; going to war, if required, was what we all signed to do; and yes, anyone who expected to make a career as a warrior needed to prove that he could be one. If this is "ticket punching", then I'm guilty. I don't denigrate the "ticket punchers" - especially the captains and looies. Their motives were generally honorable and their intentions good. But the system was dumb and undoubtably resulted in some good people getting killed who didn't have to be. And that's a heavy price to pay for the sake of increasing the number of tickets punched. -- "Cave ab homine unius libri" |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, I DEROS'd 10 days early: maybe I should run for President.
-- Jack "Cave ab homine unius libri" |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ian maclure" wrote in message ...
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:53:48 +0000, WalterM140 wrote: I believe that is the first time I have heard of the F-102 as a "safe aircraft"! Were they really? Compared to flying F-105's to Route Package Six, they were very safe when compared to flying an F-102 over Houston. Non-responsive. Absent the folks shooting at you and the fact that Air Intercept is usually a regime thats less hazardous inherently than moving mud, both are equally hazardous. IOW, if you don't consider the factors that make one more hazardous, they are equally hazaradous? Or are you just saying that any risk differential was largely independent of the type of aircraft being flown? One should probably also factor in quality of maitenance domestically vs in theater. Didn't the 102 have the downward firing ejection seat that made low-level ejections, er, problematic? -- FF |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nt (Krztalizer) wrote in
: And things like "Route Package Six" were part of the problem in Vietnam. Why fergawdsake, set up predictable in/out routes for raids. Apparently this is what happened for a long time. Meant the NVA could set up their SAMs and AAA along those routes and concentrate their fire. Mosquito bombers en route to Berlin in 44-45 had set approach routes, well known to aircrews and flak gunners alike. The three routes were so well travelled that even the Jerries referred to approaching bogies as "stranger on (train) Platform 3". Anti-Mosquito units were deliberately stationed on top of the three arriving "railroad" routes... Glad to see we learned from that little mistake... A friend of mine did two tours in A4s in Vietnam. Mention that particular idiocy to him and steam starts pouring out his ears. Anybody know what the dumbasses who thought that one up were thinking. Was it an effort to deconflict or just plain stupidity at high elevels. Even worse was it the politicians trying to run the war at a tactical level? IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(WalterM140) wrote in
: Ya know I really don't know what all the fuss was about here. I graduated from college in 1968 in Arizona. Did you go to Officer Candidates School? Bush 43 did not. So? Was OCS the only route to a commission? IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Shatzer" wrote
But the system was dumb and undoubtably resulted in some good people getting killed who didn't have to be. Most of the men killed in my platoons died because they failed basic military skills. Every time we went out, someone would trip over a booby trap and kill the two guys behind him that were bunched-up. It never had anything to do with the REMF's. I never once lacked any supply I requested. The logistics troops were always giving us what we wanted, and the air support and artillery were instantaneous. We almost never had to carry dead troops out of the field. We stacked them up, and a helo came in and took them away. We had guys who just refused to wear a flak jacket. Nothing I could threaten them with would convince them I was right. Most of them got stacked. **** em. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you imitate Thurston Howell III?
"Jack" wrote Hey, I DEROS'd 10 days early: maybe I should run for President. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(WalterM140) wrote in
: Ya know I really don't know what all the fuss was about here. Bush skipped out on the last two years of his commitment. That's one problem. So you claim. Got any hard evidence of this? No? Then belt up! IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"D. Strang" wrote in
news:[email protected]: [snip] JFKerry skipped out of his last 8 months in the war zone (after receiving three scratches in the line of duty). One of which ( it is alleged ) he got by playing the asshole with explosive ordnance. IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 196 | June 14th 04 11:33 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |