If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
Umm, I would like to see this cancellation scenario happen when the IFR
student is on his check ride with either an FAA examiner or DER in the plane... Watching two branches of the federal government duke it out could be highly entertaining... Anyway, if you are not truly VFR or if you need that IFR approach for currency there is that word in the regs, "Unable", for a reason... A single word, unadorned - and no further explanation will be offered by me any more than he did. The controller is then obligated to continue to handle you IFR... Now, having said that, being normally a cooperative cuss, and if I am just shooting the approach to stay sharp, and he is busy, etc., I won't care, I'll simply grunt, "roger that, 57 pop", hit the 1200 button and continue the approach... denny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
Denny wrote:
.. Watching two branches of the federal government duke it out could be highly entertaining... It's all the FAA. They often never talk to each other. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
"Denny" wrote in message oups.com... Umm, I would like to see this cancellation scenario happen when the IFR student is on his check ride with either an FAA examiner or DER in the plane... Watching two branches of the federal government duke it out could be highly entertaining... Which two of the three (Judicial, Legislative, Executive)? Are you one of those modern public school graduates? :~) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
"Steven P. McNicoll" writes:
"Christopher C. Stacy" wrote in message ... When he gave you the clearance for the approach, did he say "Maintain VFR?" If not, you were really IFR. No. You're really IFR when you hear "Cleared to..." Like in, "Cleared for the ILS runway 23 at Foobar maintain 2000 until established" ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
Christopher C. Stacy wrote: "Steven P. McNicoll" writes: "Christopher C. Stacy" wrote in message ... When he gave you the clearance for the approach, did he say "Maintain VFR?" If not, you were really IFR. No. You're really IFR when you hear "Cleared to..." Like in, "Cleared for the ILS runway 23 at Foobar maintain 2000 until established" ? Or "Cleared to Land" Word games aside, Steven is right. The difference between being IFR and VFR in controlled airspace is being told "cleared to foobar". -Robert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
"Christopher C. Stacy" wrote in message ... Like in, "Cleared for the ILS runway 23 at Foobar maintain 2000 until established" ? No. Like when you picked up your IFR clearance some time prior to that and heard "Cleared to..." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
Christopher C. Stacy wrote: "Steven P. McNicoll" writes: "Christopher C. Stacy" wrote in message ... When he gave you the clearance for the approach, did he say "Maintain VFR?" If not, you were really IFR. No. You're really IFR when you hear "Cleared to..." Like in, "Cleared for the ILS runway 23 at Foobar maintain 2000 until established" ? My interpretation of the ATC handbook is that there are three types of practice approaches: 1) You can be IFR, in which case it works just like any other IFR operation except that practice approaches are lower priority (you can be delayed). This comes with a proper IFR clearance (with a clearance limit) as has been stated in this thread. 2) You can be VFR, but with separation services. Here you get 500 ft vertical separation from other traffic and standard lateral separation. The published miss is not authorized unless the controller specifically approves it, and if he does approve it, separation services are provided for the missed approach procedure as well. This comes with the instruction "CLEARED FOR THE APPROACH" or similar. 3) You can be VFR, but without separation services. The missed approach is again not authorized. This comes with the instruction "PRACTICE APPROACH APPROVED" or similar. If you're operating under VFR, the controller is supposed to remind you by saying "MAINTAIN VFR" at some point, but if the controller forgets, it doesn't change anything. If separation services are provided, then the controller must be informed when to terminate those services. Could this be when the confusion occurs? What is the terminology for terminating VFR separation services? I've assumed that many controllers use standard IFR cancellation terminology for that even when the airplane is operated under VFR. Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Christopher C. Stacy" wrote in message ... When he gave you the clearance for the approach, did he say "Maintain VFR?" If not, you were really IFR. No. You're really IFR when you hear "Cleared to..." I once requested a practice approach with a student, and the controller asked if I wanted to do it VFR or IFR. I replied that I preferred VFR, and he gave me an altitude to climb to. I told him that if he wanted us there, we'd have to do it IFR. His response? "Ok, you're IFR then. Climb and maintain 5000." It's really hard to teach correct phraseology to a student with instructions like that. Student and I had a really long talk on the ground later. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Christopher C. Stacy" wrote in message ... When he gave you the clearance for the approach, did he say "Maintain VFR?" If not, you were really IFR. No. You're really IFR when you hear "Cleared to..." How about this: Pilot: "SoCal Approach, Piper 1234B is 10 west of Paradise on top at 5,500. Request ILS approach to Chino 26 Right." ATC: "34B squawk 2133...34B radar contact, fly present heading for the Chino ILS 26 Right. Descend and maintain 4,000." Did the controller issue an IFR clearance? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Silly controller
Sam Spade wrote in news:FhrIg.196$c07.193@fed1read04:
How about this: Pilot: "SoCal Approach, Piper 1234B is 10 west of Paradise on top at 5,500. Request ILS approach to Chino 26 Right." Request for an ILS approach is not a request for an IFR clearance using CRAFT as guidelines. You have not met the C part of CRAFT ATC: "34B squawk 2133...34B radar contact, fly present heading for the Chino ILS 26 Right. Descend and maintain 4,000." Did the controller issue an IFR clearance? Nope, you were not cleared, nor were you on an IFR flight. You were VFR in the beginning and was treated accordingly from what I have been reading. ATC does not know what is outside YOUR window (VMC or IMC). The above ATC instructions does not meet the C part of CRAFT (Cleared to) Allen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Silly controller | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 119 | August 30th 06 01:56 AM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Columns by a Canadian centre controller | David Megginson | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 04 10:05 PM |
Skyguide traffic controller killed | HECTOP | Piloting | 39 | March 3rd 04 01:46 AM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |