Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Who cares? The important thing is that Bush never fought due to cowardice
Same
for Cheney. Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better
than neocons. WW II for example. We have the wong party leading America.


Roosevelt never served in the military.

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: "Steven P. McNicoll"
Date: 8/28/2004 10:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Who cares? The important thing is that Bush never fought due to cowardice
Same
for Cheney. Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better
than neocons. WW II for example. We have the wong party leading America.


Roosevelt never served in the military.


But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 6:41 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: "Steven P. McNicoll"
Date: 8/28/2004 10:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Who cares? The important thing is that Bush never fought due to cowardice
Same
for Cheney. Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better
than neocons. WW II for example. We have the wong party leading America.


Roosevelt never served in the military.


But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.


Arthur Kramer

Geeze, art, you can take all sides just like that scuzzball kerry. First you
said FDR was a great war leader because he was a combat vet therefore kerry
would be one too because he is a combat vet. Now you say it doesn't matter that
FDR wasn't a combat after spending months telling us that Bush could never be a
good president because he wasn't a combat vet.You have spent months telling us
combat veterans are the only people you respect and now this? I bet you don't
even see a contradiction. Now just how will you blame "neocons" for your
twisted logic?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: (B2431)
Date: 8/29/2004 4:58 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 6:41 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: "Steven P. McNicoll"
Date: 8/28/2004 10:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Who cares? The important thing is that Bush never fought due to
cowardice
Same
for Cheney. Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better
than neocons. WW II for example. We have the wong party leading America.


Roosevelt never served in the military.


But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.


Arthur Kramer

Geeze, art, you can take all sides just like that scuzzball kerry. First you
said FDR was a great war leader because he was a combat vet therefore kerry
would be one too because he is a combat vet. Now you say it doesn't matter
that
FDR wasn't a combat after spending months telling us that Bush could never be
a
good president because he wasn't a combat vet.You have spent months telling
us
combat veterans are the only people you respect and now this? I bet you
don't
even see a contradiction. Now just how will you blame "neocons" for your
twisted logic?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


You can't read.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

The important thing is that Bush never fought due to cowardice.
Same for Cheney.

Why is this important? Is everyone a coward who didn't go to war?

Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better than neocons.

Millions of men died and he created the cold war. Ted Kennedy
never fought better, and he's a Democrat?

But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.

So if a million men die, then Bush will become a great war leader?

You can't read.

Your logic is like a 5 year old kid.

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.


How so? There were far more casualties under Roosevelt.

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: (B2431)
Date: 8/29/2004 4:58 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 6:41 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: "Steven P. McNicoll"
Date: 8/28/2004 10:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Who cares? The important thing is that Bush never fought due to
cowardice
Same
for Cheney. Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better
than neocons. WW II for example. We have the wong party leading
America.


Roosevelt never served in the military.


But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.


Arthur Kramer

Geeze, art, you can take all sides just like that scuzzball kerry. First
you
said FDR was a great war leader because he was a combat vet therefore
kerry
would be one too because he is a combat vet. Now you say it doesn't
matter
that
FDR wasn't a combat after spending months telling us that Bush could
never be
a
good president because he wasn't a combat vet.You have spent months
telling
us
combat veterans are the only people you respect and now this? I bet you
don't
even see a contradiction. Now just how will you blame "neocons" for your
twisted logic?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


You can't read.


You can't think.

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 7:04 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: (B2431)
Date: 8/29/2004 4:58 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 6:41 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: "Steven P. McNicoll"
Date: 8/28/2004 10:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Who cares? The important thing is that Bush never fought due to
cowardice
Same
for Cheney. Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better
than neocons. WW II for example. We have the wong party leading
America.


Roosevelt never served in the military.


But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.


Arthur Kramer

Geeze, art, you can take all sides just like that scuzzball kerry. First you
said FDR was a great war leader because he was a combat vet therefore kerry
would be one too because he is a combat vet. Now you say it doesn't matter
that
FDR wasn't a combat after spending months telling us that Bush could never
be
a
good president because he wasn't a combat vet.You have spent months telling
us
combat veterans are the only people you respect and now this? I bet you
don't
even see a contradiction. Now just how will you blame "neocons" for your
twisted logic?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


You can't read.


Arthur Kramer

And you can't admit when you are wrong. You, sir, are a lying hypocrite.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: (B2431)
Date: 8/29/2004 11:18 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 7:04 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: (B2431)
Date: 8/29/2004 4:58 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

From: (ArtKramr)
Date: 8/29/2004 6:41 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Lot of noise being made about Purple Hearts
From: "Steven P. McNicoll"
Date: 8/28/2004 10:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Who cares? The important thing is that Bush never fought due to
cowardice
Same
for Cheney. Where is Roosevelt now that we need him. Democrats fight
better
than neocons. WW II for example. We have the wong party leading
America.


Roosevelt never served in the military.


But he was a great war leader while Bush is a disaster.


Arthur Kramer

Geeze, art, you can take all sides just like that scuzzball kerry. First
you
said FDR was a great war leader because he was a combat vet therefore kerry
would be one too because he is a combat vet. Now you say it doesn't matter
that
FDR wasn't a combat after spending months telling us that Bush could never
be
a
good president because he wasn't a combat vet.You have spent months telling
us
combat veterans are the only people you respect and now this? I bet you
don't
even see a contradiction. Now just how will you blame "neocons" for your
twisted logic?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


You can't read.


Arthur Kramer

And you can't admit when you are wrong. You, sir, are a lying hypocrite.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


PLONK
Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote

PLONK

I guess that was the toilet seat lid. Hopefully he is going to flush now,
although I don't think he's gotten everything out of his brain yet.