If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve
2 Democrats: Bush Let Guard Down
Gore Surrogates Revive Issue of Apparent Laxity in Candidate's Military Service By George Lardner Jr. and Howard Kurtz Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, November 3, 2000; Page A22 Two high-profile surrogates for Vice President Gore, in an 11th-hour attempt to exploit a dormant issue, yesterday castigated George W. Bush over allegations that he did not fulfill some of his National Guard duties in the 1970s. Democratic Sens. Bob Kerrey (Neb.) and Daniel Inouye (Hawaii), both Medal of Honor winners, were drafted to attack Bush on a 27-year-old controversy that the Gore campaign has avoided mentioning until now. They spoke by phone to a veterans rally in Nashville led by Sen. Max Cleland (D-Ga.), a decorated Vietnam veteran. Reporters were invited to listen by conference call. Bush says he fulfilled all his obligations as a pilot in the Air National Guard, but he has had difficulty rebutting charges that he played hooky for a year. "Where were you, Governor Bush?" Inouye asked. "What about your commitment? What would you do as commander in chief if someone in the Guard or service did the same thing?" Kerrey questioned how Bush immediately got into the Guard "even though there were 500 people ahead of him" at a time when "350 Americans were dying every single week in Vietnam." Kerrey has been drawing a sharp contrast with Gore, who served in Vietnam. Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer called the attacks "the final throes of a campaign that has now lost any semblance of decency. The governor, of course, was honorably discharged, and these are inventions and fabrications. All the questions have been answered." But Gore spokesman Mark Fabiani said the senators "seem to have raised some very important questions . . . that deserve an answer." Bush signed up with the Texas National Guard for six years in May 1968, which allowed him to avoid the Vietnam draft. He became an F-102 pilot in 1970 but made his last flight in April 1972 before moving to Alabama to work on a GOP Senate campaign. The dispute centers on what he did in the Guard between that point and September 1973, when he entered Harvard Business School. Bush campaign officials say their evidence shows that he did his duty in 1972-73, when he worked for six months on the Senate race in Alabama and then returned to his home base outside Houston. But other documents in his Guard record contradict that claim, and critics who have examined that record contend that he also skimped on his obligations in 1973-74. It is safe to say that Bush did very light duty in his last two years in the Guard and that his superiors made it easy for him. The personnel officer in charge of Bush's 147th Fighter Group, now-retired Col. Rufus G. Martin, says he tried to give Bush a light load, telling him to apply to the 9921st Air Reserve Squadron in Montgomery, Ala. Martin said in an interview that he knew Bush wasn't eligible for the 9921st, an unpaid, general training squadron that met once a week to hear lectures on first aid and the like. "However," he said, "I thought it was worth a try. . . .. It was the least participation of any type of unit." But Air Force Reserve officials rejected the assignment, saying Bush had two more years of military obligations and was ineligible for a reserve squadron that had nothing to do with flying airplanes. Bush spokesman Dan Bartlett said Bush didn't know that when he applied. Bush had been notified that he needed to take his annual flying physical by his 26th birthday in July 1972, but the move to Alabama made that unnecessary. He had been trained to fly F-102 fighter-interceptors, and none of the units in Alabama had those planes. He could have taken the physical to preserve his pilot's status but chose not to do so. "Because he wasn't flying," Bartlett said. On Aug. 1, 1972, Bush's commander in Houston, Col. Bobby W. Hodges, ordered him grounded for "failure to accomplish annual medical examination." Some critics say this should have triggered a formal board of inquiry, but Hodges said in an interview that this was unnecessary because Bush accepted the penalty and knew "he couldn't fly again until he takes a physical." "It happens all the time," Hodges said of the grounding. "That is normal when a Guardsman is out of state or out of the country." In September, Bush was assigned to another Alabama unit, the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group. Since "Lieutenant Bush will not be able to satisfy his flight requirements with our group," the unit told him to report for "equivalent training"--such as debriefing pilots--on the weekends of Oct. 7-8 and Nov. 4-5, 1972. There is no evidence in his record that he showed up on either weekend. Friends on the Alabama campaign say he told them of having to do Guard duty, but the retired general who commanded the 187th, William Turnipseed, and his personnel chief, Kenneth K. Lott, say they do not remember Bush ever reporting. The Bush campaign points to a torn piece of paper in his Guard records, a statement of points Bush apparently earned in 1972-73, although most of the dates and Bush's name except for the "W" have been torn off. According to the torn Air Reserve Forces sheet, Bush continued to compile service credits after returning to Houston, winding up his fifth year with 56 points, six above the minimum needed for retention. However, Bush's annual effectiveness report, signed by two superiors, says "Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of the report," May 1, 1972, to April 30, 1973. Hodges also said he did not see Bush at the Texas base again after Bush left for Montgomery. "If I had been there on the day[s] he came out, I would have seen him," Hodges said. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Let's clarify this a bit. What the writer MEANT to say what that two DEMOCRATIC
PARTY politicians who just happened to have been awarded the Medal of Honor have once again criticized President Bush's service in the Air National Guard. The emphasis should not be that they won the Medal of Honor because there are likely quite a few of the living holders of that medal who are not criticizing President Bush's service in the Air National Guard. But as DEMOCRATIC PARTY politicians, the two Senators have a powerful vested interest in criticizing a Republican president if even the remotest possibility exists to do so. Jerry Hall |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
First, what does the Medal of Honor have to do with politics? Nothing.
Second, we're talking about only two people. That's 2 out of 132 surviving medal winners from WW2, Korea and Vietnam. If you do the math, that's 1.5 percent! Hardly a thought-provoking statistic. If you were to poll the others, you may be shocked at the statistics. I know of one locally who supports the President. Ed "If an enemy power is bent on conquering you, and proposed to turn all of his resources to that end, he is at war with you; and you -- unless you contemplate surrender -- are at war with him." --Barry Goldwater |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Let's clarify this a bit. What the writer MEANT to say what that two
DEMOCRATIC PARTY politicians who just happened to have been awarded the Medal of Honor... People don't just "happen" to be awarded the MOH. Try again. Walt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
First, what does the Medal of Honor have to do with politics? Nothing.
Second, we're talking about only two people. That's 2 out of 132 surviving medal winners from WW2, Korea and Vietnam. If you do the math, that's 1.5 percent! Hardly a thought-provoking statistic. That's pitiful. Walt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Let's get something straight!
Whether George Bush "served" in the Air National Guard or not, today he has almost three years experience as wartime Commander-In Chief of the greatest military force in history of mankind, which John Kerry does NOT have! Kerry's four months of dodging bullets and mooching medals hardly qualifies as military Command-In-Chief experience, which is the job in question, not being patrol boat commander! Those two MOH winners cited need to get a sense of proportion, especially Bob Kerrey who has been so blatantly partisan at political blame laying while a member of that appalling 9/11 "Star Chamber" Congressional Commission! So either get it right or forget it! WDA end "WalterM140" wrote in message ... 2 Democrats: Bush Let Guard Down Gore Surrogates Revive Issue of Apparent Laxity in Candidate's Military Service By George Lardner Jr. and Howard Kurtz Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, November 3, 2000; Page A22 Two high-profile surrogates for Vice President Gore, in an 11th-hour attempt to exploit a dormant issue, yesterday castigated George W. Bush over allegations that he did not fulfill some of his National Guard duties in the 1970s. Democratic Sens. Bob Kerrey (Neb.) and Daniel Inouye (Hawaii), both Medal of Honor winners, were drafted to attack Bush on a 27-year-old controversy that the Gore campaign has avoided mentioning until now. They spoke by phone to a veterans rally in Nashville led by Sen. Max Cleland (D-Ga.), a decorated Vietnam veteran. Reporters were invited to listen by conference call. Bush says he fulfilled all his obligations as a pilot in the Air National Guard, but he has had difficulty rebutting charges that he played hooky for a year. "Where were you, Governor Bush?" Inouye asked. "What about your commitment? What would you do as commander in chief if someone in the Guard or service did the same thing?" Kerrey questioned how Bush immediately got into the Guard "even though there were 500 people ahead of him" at a time when "350 Americans were dying every single week in Vietnam." Kerrey has been drawing a sharp contrast with Gore, who served in Vietnam. Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer called the attacks "the final throes of a campaign that has now lost any semblance of decency. The governor, of course, was honorably discharged, and these are inventions and fabrications. All the questions have been answered." But Gore spokesman Mark Fabiani said the senators "seem to have raised some very important questions . . . that deserve an answer." Bush signed up with the Texas National Guard for six years in May 1968, which allowed him to avoid the Vietnam draft. He became an F-102 pilot in 1970 but made his last flight in April 1972 before moving to Alabama to work on a GOP Senate campaign. The dispute centers on what he did in the Guard between that point and September 1973, when he entered Harvard Business School. Bush campaign officials say their evidence shows that he did his duty in 1972-73, when he worked for six months on the Senate race in Alabama and then returned to his home base outside Houston. But other documents in his Guard record contradict that claim, and critics who have examined that record contend that he also skimped on his obligations in 1973-74. It is safe to say that Bush did very light duty in his last two years in the Guard and that his superiors made it easy for him. The personnel officer in charge of Bush's 147th Fighter Group, now-retired Col. Rufus G. Martin, says he tried to give Bush a light load, telling him to apply to the 9921st Air Reserve Squadron in Montgomery, Ala. Martin said in an interview that he knew Bush wasn't eligible for the 9921st, an unpaid, general training squadron that met once a week to hear lectures on first aid and the like. "However," he said, "I thought it was worth a try. .. . . It was the least participation of any type of unit." But Air Force Reserve officials rejected the assignment, saying Bush had two more years of military obligations and was ineligible for a reserve squadron that had nothing to do with flying airplanes. Bush spokesman Dan Bartlett said Bush didn't know that when he applied. Bush had been notified that he needed to take his annual flying physical by his 26th birthday in July 1972, but the move to Alabama made that unnecessary. He had been trained to fly F-102 fighter-interceptors, and none of the units in Alabama had those planes. He could have taken the physical to preserve his pilot's status but chose not to do so. "Because he wasn't flying," Bartlett said. On Aug. 1, 1972, Bush's commander in Houston, Col. Bobby W. Hodges, ordered him grounded for "failure to accomplish annual medical examination." Some critics say this should have triggered a formal board of inquiry, but Hodges said in an interview that this was unnecessary because Bush accepted the penalty and knew "he couldn't fly again until he takes a physical." "It happens all the time," Hodges said of the grounding. "That is normal when a Guardsman is out of state or out of the country." In September, Bush was assigned to another Alabama unit, the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group. Since "Lieutenant Bush will not be able to satisfy his flight requirements with our group," the unit told him to report for "equivalent training"--such as debriefing pilots--on the weekends of Oct. 7-8 and Nov. 4-5, 1972. There is no evidence in his record that he showed up on either weekend. Friends on the Alabama campaign say he told them of having to do Guard duty, but the retired general who commanded the 187th, William Turnipseed, and his personnel chief, Kenneth K. Lott, say they do not remember Bush ever reporting. The Bush campaign points to a torn piece of paper in his Guard records, a statement of points Bush apparently earned in 1972-73, although most of the dates and Bush's name except for the "W" have been torn off. According to the torn Air Reserve Forces sheet, Bush continued to compile service credits after returning to Houston, winding up his fifth year with 56 points, six above the minimum needed for retention. However, Bush's annual effectiveness report, signed by two superiors, says "Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of the report," May 1, 1972, to April 30, 1973. Hodges also said he did not see Bush at the Texas base again after Bush left for Montgomery. "If I had been there on the day[s] he came out, I would have seen him," Hodges said. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"WalterM140" wrote in message ... 2 Democrats: Bush Let Guard Down Gore Surrogates Revive Issue of Apparent Laxity in Candidate's Military Service and you would believe them? How does receiving the Medal of Honor better qualify them to pass judgement on anything? Bravery in combat doesn't translate to superior analytical abilities. Furthermore they are, as the title "2 Democats...." notes, Democrat politicians, and therefore their views on this matter are going to be suspect to any reasonable person. Here is a more balance analysis of Bush's service. Note it isn't from one of the fringe publications you like to quote: http://web.archive.org/web/200012022....com/bush.html Jarg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
WalterM140 wrote:
Let's clarify this a bit. What the writer MEANT to say what that two DEMOCRATIC PARTY politicians who just happened to have been awarded the Medal of Honor... People don't just "happen" to be awarded the MOH. Try again. Walt You failed to mention that they both had won their MOHs long before they became politicians. It was merely a credit to their good sense that those brave men chose to become Democratic politicians. George Z. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
... WalterM140 wrote: Let's clarify this a bit. What the writer MEANT to say what that two DEMOCRATIC PARTY politicians who just happened to have been awarded the Medal of Honor... People don't just "happen" to be awarded the MOH. Try again. Walt You failed to mention that they both had won their MOHs long before they became politicians. It was merely a credit to their good sense that those brave men chose to become Democratic politicians. George Z. True, Democrat politicians have the advantage of representing poor thinkers, so that was sensible given their limited reasoning abilities. Makes reelection more likely. But winning the Medal of Honor doens't indicate good sense. Bravery, yes. Good sense, questionable. Jarg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Aerobatics | 0 | August 28th 04 11:28 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |