A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

no aerotow at MEV today due to fire



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 16th 04, 01:24 AM
ken ward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default no aerotow at MEV today due to fire

the airport manager shut down aerotow this morning at 10am; no other
operations were impacted. High Country is at Ely currently, and Soar
Minden has but one tow plane, so aerotow capability is already limited.
they've negotiated a temporary agreement for the duration of the fire,
but it limits the number of launches per hour. in any case, based on
what happens with the fire, aerotowing could be closed again any time.
a temporary tower arrived this morning. they've got 3 P-3s operating, 2
spotter planes, and 6 helicopters.

Ken
  #2  
Old July 17th 04, 02:13 AM
ken ward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
ken ward wrote:

the airport manager shut down aerotow this morning at 10am; no other
operations were impacted. High Country is at Ely currently, and Soar
Minden has but one tow plane, so aerotow capability is already limited.
they've negotiated a temporary agreement for the duration of the fire,
but it limits the number of launches per hour. in any case, based on
what happens with the fire, aerotowing could be closed again any time.
a temporary tower arrived this morning. they've got 3 P-3s operating, 2
spotter planes, and 6 helicopters.

Ken


based on the airport management letter, aerotow launches today were
limited to four per hour, with landings allowed every 30 minutes. a
maximum of 15 gliders were permitted to be in the air at any one time.

one could question how these restrictions were arrived at.

Ken
  #3  
Old July 17th 04, 08:36 PM
bumper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One could also wonder how restricting glider operations, without similarly
restricting non-emergency power operations, would not be discriminatory.

bumper

"ken ward" wrote in message
...
In article ,
ken ward wrote:

the airport manager shut down aerotow this morning at 10am; no other
operations were impacted. High Country is at Ely currently, and Soar
Minden has but one tow plane, so aerotow capability is already limited.
they've negotiated a temporary agreement for the duration of the fire,
but it limits the number of launches per hour. in any case, based on
what happens with the fire, aerotowing could be closed again any time.
a temporary tower arrived this morning. they've got 3 P-3s operating, 2
spotter planes, and 6 helicopters.

Ken


based on the airport management letter, aerotow launches today were
limited to four per hour, with landings allowed every 30 minutes. a
maximum of 15 gliders were permitted to be in the air at any one time.

one could question how these restrictions were arrived at.

Ken



  #4  
Old July 17th 04, 11:09 PM
f.blair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

maybe it is because the power planes can maneuver a littler better and might
have to do a 'go around' at the last moment because of a fire bomber coming
in, fewer gliders in the air means fewer chances for a problem in the
pattern

"bumper" wrote in message
...
One could also wonder how restricting glider operations, without similarly
restricting non-emergency power operations, would not be discriminatory.

bumper

"ken ward" wrote in message
...
In article ,
ken ward wrote:

the airport manager shut down aerotow this morning at 10am; no other
operations were impacted. High Country is at Ely currently, and Soar
Minden has but one tow plane, so aerotow capability is already

limited.
they've negotiated a temporary agreement for the duration of the fire,
but it limits the number of launches per hour. in any case, based on
what happens with the fire, aerotowing could be closed again any time.
a temporary tower arrived this morning. they've got 3 P-3s operating,

2
spotter planes, and 6 helicopters.

Ken


based on the airport management letter, aerotow launches today were
limited to four per hour, with landings allowed every 30 minutes. a
maximum of 15 gliders were permitted to be in the air at any one time.

one could question how these restrictions were arrived at.

Ken





  #5  
Old July 18th 04, 12:14 AM
Andy Blackburn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not sure exactly what it means to allow glider landings
every 30 minutes - it sounds potentially quite exciting!

9B

At 22:24 17 July 2004, F.Blair wrote:
maybe it is because the power planes can maneuver a
littler better and might
have to do a 'go around' at the last moment because
of a fire bomber coming
in, fewer gliders in the air means fewer chances for
a problem in the
pattern

'bumper' wrote in message
...

One could also wonder how restricting glider operations,
without similarly
restricting non-emergency power operations, would
not be discriminatory.

bumper

'ken ward' wrote in message
...
In article ,
ken ward wrote:

the airport manager shut down aerotow this morning
at 10am; no other
operations were impacted. High Country is at Ely
currently, and Soar
Minden has but one tow plane, so aerotow capability
is already

limited.
they've negotiated a temporary agreement for the
duration of the fire,
but it limits the number of launches per hour.
in any case, based on
what happens with the fire, aerotowing could be
closed again any time.
a temporary tower arrived this morning. they've
got 3 P-3s operating,

2
spotter planes, and 6 helicopters.

Ken

based on the airport management letter, aerotow launches
today were
limited to four per hour, with landings allowed every
30 minutes. a
maximum of 15 gliders were permitted to be in the
air at any one time.

one could question how these restrictions were arrived
at.

Ken









  #6  
Old July 18th 04, 12:51 AM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

bumper wrote:
One could also wonder how restricting glider operations, without similarly
restricting non-emergency power operations, would not be discriminatory.


Were self-launching gliders restricted, or only towed gliders?

--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

  #7  
Old July 18th 04, 01:04 AM
ken ward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Eric Greenwell wrote:

bumper wrote:
One could also wonder how restricting glider operations, without similarly
restricting non-emergency power operations, would not be discriminatory.


Were self-launching gliders restricted, or only towed gliders?


only aero tow operations. that restriction was lifted for today.

since Soar Minden has but one tow plane, SM aero tows were only
available to SM rentals and lessons, until those gliders were done for
the day. this will likely continue until a second tow plane is
available, perhaps mid next week.

Ken
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Friendly fire" Mike Naval Aviation 3 April 6th 04 06:07 PM
My Engine Fire!! [email protected] Piloting 21 April 2nd 04 05:02 PM
My Engine Fire!! [email protected] Owning 1 March 31st 04 01:41 PM
U.S. won't have to reveal other friendly fire events: Schmidt's lawyers hoped to use other incidents to help their case Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 18th 03 08:44 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.