If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Gene Whitt ) wrote:
There are seven birds on a branch. Three left. How many are left? Three, of course! Four right. -- Peter Left handed, right minded. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message news "Matt Barrow" wrote in message news Which letter of which law? The letter b. FAR 91.126(b) to be specific. The question, which you snipped: "The 45 degree turn to downwind violates the letter of the law regardless what the FAA sayeth." violates which law? FAR 91.126(b) make no reference to angle of entry, nor direction of turn to ENTER the pattern flow regardless of angle. Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene Whitt" wrote in message k.net... Y'All, How come no one has considered as one way to make a right 90-degree turn is to make a left-270. Of course if it were a perfect world everyone would be left handed and in their right mind. Was working with a little first grader on her math book last week. Never realized how many ways the words left and right could be used. Consider: There are seven birds on a branch. Three left. How many are left? "Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left." Sorry. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter R." wrote in message ... Gene Whitt ) wrote: There are seven birds on a branch. Three left. How many are left? Three, of course! Four right. -- Peter Left handed, right minded. Three left, three right, one center. Matt Ham handed --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... I think the whole question is a tempest in a teapot. Who is going to cite the "offending" pilot for making a right turn to enter left traffic from the 45? Nobody. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Matt Barrow wrote: "Gene Whitt" wrote in message nk.net... Y'All, How come no one has considered as one way to make a right 90-degree turn is to make a left-270. Of course if it were a perfect world everyone would be left handed and in their right mind. Was working with a little first grader on her math book last week. Never realized how many ways the words left and right could be used. Consider: There are seven birds on a branch. Three left. How many are left? "Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left." Only in a Eucidean geometry. Sorry. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 08:58:40 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
In article , wrote: Thanks, Roy As I've just posted to Bob, if "approaching to land" means "already in the pattern", then I could do a 90 degree right turn onto short final, where left pattern is in effect. So if a RIGHT turn is permitted by the FARs onto downwind, then so must a RIGHT turn onto final (where left traffic in effect). Hence the quandary Well, like I said, you need to apply common sense. Somebody just posted about this instrument approach: We are comparing two FAA books. Where does common sense come in there? In the real world, yet, but not when comparing direct FAA statements .. http://www.airnav.com/depart?http://...00379LDBCA.PDF Let's say you're coming in from San Marcus. What are you supposed to do when you reach KOAKS? You make a (gasp) right turn onto final. Surely you're "approaching to land", since you're flying an approach procedure. Are you going to worry that the runway may have a left traffic pattern and therefore 91.126 won't let you make a right turn? Of course not. They already got this one with the, "Unless otherwise state". :-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com You need to apply common sense. If you're going to look for inconsistencies and stupidities in the FARs, you'll spend your whole life getting hung up on stuff like this. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Roy Smith wrote:
Steven P. McNicoll wrote: (a) General. Unless otherwise authorized or required, each person operating an aircraft on or in the vicinity of an airport in a Class G airspace area must comply with the requirements of this section. If an IAP requires a right turn to the final approach course you're clearly "otherwise authorized or required". True enough. And making a right turn from the 45 to left downwind is just as clearly required. I don't see it as being required. Authorized, yes, but I don't know of any FAR that requires it. I enter the pattern on a 45 if it is convenient. If I'm approaching from the upwind side of the field, I overfly above pattern altitude a couple hundred feet, check the wind indicator to confirm proper runway, look to the right for other traffic in or entering the pattern, and then make a descending left turn into the downwind leg. I've read arguments for and against the 45 entry and I just don't see that either way is clearly preferable to the other. There are vulnerabilities either way. Matt |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote: Roy Smith wrote: Steven P. McNicoll wrote: (a) General. Unless otherwise authorized or required, each person operating an aircraft on or in the vicinity of an airport in a Class G airspace area must comply with the requirements of this section. If an IAP requires a right turn to the final approach course you're clearly "otherwise authorized or required". True enough. And making a right turn from the 45 to left downwind is just as clearly required. I don't see it as being required. Authorized, yes, but I don't know of any FAR that requires it. I enter the pattern on a 45 if it is convenient. I think you mis-parsed my statement. What I meant was "If you are on the 45, and you want to turn onto left downwind, it is required that you make a right turn". I did not mean to imply that you are required to make a 45 entry. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
What I meant was "If you are on
the 45, and you want to turn onto left downwind, it is required that you make a right turn". No it's not. What is required is that you end up pointing 45 degrees to the right. You can do this by turning left 315 degrees. Of course it makes only almost as much sense as doing 270 degree turns instead of a 90 the other way. Jose -- Money: What you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
Requirement to fly departure procedures | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | October 15th 03 06:39 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |