If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:18:58 GMT, Gary Mishler wrote:
"Franklin " "Franklin wrote in message ... On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:30:47 GMT, Gary Mishler wrote: "Franklin" wrote in message ... Ricky wrote: On Jul 11, 11:23 am, Franklin wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_gpPbpONK4 Some people WANT to believe this even though they need only look at a jet engine for 2 seconds to know it's fake. "Franklin," why don't explain and entertain us with your theory behind this being a fake. How does "looking at a jet engine for 2 seconds" convince one to believe this accident was a fake? Franklin, the serviceman being sucked into the jet on-deck was real, very, very real. Ricky Hello sock. Why doesn't your organ grinder ask the questions rather than use his monkey? For me, it's too amazing that a guy working next to an Intruder gets sucked into one of its intakes with such massive force that it dragged him off the ground but afterwards he doesn't have any crush damage from jamming between the bullet cone and cowling and doesn't look like he been squeezed hard up against the stator vanes. http://www.imageno.com/k3bfdhgc73i0pic.html http://images.marketworks.com/hi/72/72196/KL37C03.jpg Maybe he's supposed to have squeezed through the low bypass compressor bleed channel to come out unscathed. Heh heh! Let's have that 2 second look at what those J52s on an Intruder really looks like ... http://www.imageno.com/pyopisgsihhtpic.html OK, so what passed through the engine to cause the rear flash in the vid? If anything solid went through that turbofan there'd likely be a blade-out which looks very different to the brief flare out in the vid. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcALjMJbAvU The vid shows our hero posing for a photo only hours afterwards. No shock, no crushed shoulders, no broken ribs, no split skull, no broken nose. Seemed to me the vid showed the mannequin had a floppy thigh bone but the guy looks fine afterwards, no bloodied clothing, no major abrasions. ... Just an arm sling and a bandage for a head graze. Gimme a break. He would be undergoing tests in ICU for the rest of the day and may be the day after that as well. A few hours afterwards he wouldn't be posing with his pals but he'd be filling in incidence reports, the safety officer would be going berserk and the carrier's senior officers would be doing some interviewing. The vid's date is Feb 20 1991 but the quality looks like it's from the 1960s. Most vids from 1991 are in color. Try frame advancing the spoof using this AVI rather than an FLV: http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...s/sucked%20in% 20engine.avi Certainly there are fake videos in the world. This one however is real. It has been featured on network news magazines (Don't know if it was 60 Minuites, Nightline, or what). It also is used as a training film in the military and most major airlines. This one is real. You're full of it. I explained once and once was enough. Ok folks I get it now. We are dealing with a Troll. I will stop feeding the Troll now. Typical, yell "troll" because you have been shown up as an aviation novice. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Jul 16, 2:42*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote: See how I control you, Monkey? It's embarrassing, isn't it? The fact that you exist & are on rap is what's embarrassing. Ricky |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:11:29 -0700 (PDT), George wrote:
On Jul 16, 2:42*pm, Franklin "Franklin wrote: See how I control you, Monkey? It's embarrassing, isn't it? The fact that you exist & are on rap is what's embarrassing. Ricky Dear George or Ricky or Dudley Henriques or Whoever Sock Puppet you are this minute I'm sure you say you've never posted as anyone but yourself. However that denial doesn't prove anything. (1) If you were a sock then you can't actually able post because that's something your sockmaster would have to do. (2) If you were a liar, your claim to tell the truth could be a lie. --- Are you able to comment how you were posting for a period of 7 hours. Then only a few minutes after you stopped, the self-acknowledged sock "Dudley Henriques" posts suddenly started to post. He hadn't made a single post at any time in the previous 9 hours. And as he started to post, you completely stopped posting. That's a remarkable co-incidence. In fact, it's too remarkable. It's impossible. Such a pattern repeats itself over and over again. If two people were posting randomly, that pattern wouldn't occur. Is there anything else you want to say about this? |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Jul 17, 11:45*am, Franklin "Franklin
wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:11:29 -0700 (PDT), George wrote: On Jul 16, 2:42*pm, Franklin "Franklin wrote: See how I control you, Monkey? It's embarrassing, isn't it? The fact that you exist & are on rap is what's embarrassing. Ricky Dear George or Ricky or Dudley Henriques or Whoever Sock Puppet you are this minute I'm sure you say you've never posted as anyone but yourself. * However that denial doesn't prove anything. (1) If you were a sock then you can't actually able post because that's something your sockmaster would have to do. (2) If you were a liar, your claim to tell the truth could be a lie. --- Are you able to comment how you were posting for a period of 7 hours. * Then only a few minutes after you stopped, the self-acknowledged sock "Dudley Henriques" posts suddenly started to post. He hadn't made a single post at any time in the previous 9 hours. And as he started to post, you completely stopped posting. That's a remarkable co-incidence. In fact, it's too remarkable. *It's impossible. *Such a pattern repeats itself over and over again. If two people were posting randomly, that pattern wouldn't occur. Is there anything else you want to say about this? Why are you talking to UUnet? Go outside, play, run & jump. And it's random. And don't skip your meds again. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
Terry Aardema wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:08:40 -0600, Franklin wrote: Are you mixing up two vids? One shows a tech's cranial being sucked off his head into the intake. The other (far more improbable one) shows a man being sucked of the ground into the intake accompanied followed by a large flash and cloud of smoke. Like some sort of stage illusion. A few hours later he's shown posing for the camera with his arm in a sling and a simple bandage around his head. Perhaps the Flight Safety people were just trying to make you sit up and take notice of safety. A jet connected to an aircraft carriers catapult is at full power; that is a LOT of air being moved. Anyone that moves into that airflow within a foot or less of the lip of the intake is going into that intake. And if you've ever seen a military jet that's ingested a bird on take-off you'll know that the "stage illusion" is nothing of the sort; that flash and cloud of smoke is *exactly* what happens, along with emergency vehicle sirens, a hefty price tag, and a bunch of guys in uniform performing a FOD walk down the runway once the sirens wind down. What makes you think that a helmet and set of ear-defenders would cause less damage? Terry Hiya Terry. Sorry if I wasn't being clear. I was saying that the smoke and flash were just showy. I agree his helmet would probably cause as much damage as a birdstrike and even cause a bladeout. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Jul 18, 10:09*am, Franklin wrote:
I agree his helmet would probably cause as much damage as a birdstrike and even cause a bladeout. Bladeout ???????????????? |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
In article c53edcec-7d83-4dc4-a003-c0ce51eae638
@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com, says... On Jul 18, 10:09*am, Franklin wrote: I agree his helmet would probably cause as much damage as a birdstrike and even cause a bladeout. Bladeout ???????????????? What the pilot does when a PAX does something really stupid - get the blade out. -- Duncan |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:45:44 -0700 (PDT), Richard wrote:
On Jul 17, 11:45*am, Franklin "Franklin wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:11:29 -0700 (PDT), George wrote: On Jul 16, 2:42*pm, Franklin "Franklin wrote: See how I control you, Monkey? It's embarrassing, isn't it? The fact that you exist & are on rap is what's embarrassing. Ricky Dear George or Ricky or Dudley Henriques or Whoever Sock Puppet you are this minute I'm sure you say you've never posted as anyone but yourself. * However that denial doesn't prove anything. (1) If you were a sock then you can't actually able post because that's something your sockmaster would have to do. (2) If you were a liar, your claim to tell the truth could be a lie. --- Are you able to comment how you were posting for a period of 7 hours. * Then only a few minutes after you stopped, the self-acknowledged sock "Dudley Henriques" posts suddenly started to post. He hadn't made a single post at any time in the previous 9 hours. And as he started to post, you completely stopped posting. That's a remarkable co-incidence. In fact, it's too remarkable. *It's impossible. *Such a pattern repeats itself over and over again. If two people were posting randomly, that pattern wouldn't occur. Is there anything else you want to say about this? Why are you talking to UUnet? Go outside, play, run & jump. And it's random. And don't skip your meds again. Our companion Ricky/George/Richard may be a seemingly personable soul but we must take care not to let this obscure the fact that he is far too dense to realize he has long ago been out of his depth in this exchange. I think you could be wasting your time because Ricky/George/Richard lacks the basic personal equipment needed to comprehend these concepts. In other words, he has no brains. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:48:12 +1200, Dave Doe wrote:
In article c53edcec-7d83-4dc4-a003-c0ce51eae638 @j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com, says... On Jul 18, 10:09*am, Franklin wrote: I agree his helmet would probably cause as much damage as a birdstrike and even cause a bladeout. Bladeout ???????????????? What the pilot does when a PAX does something really stupid - get the blade out. No, no, that's what a Flight Sim X player does when he gets bored. Franklin pulls his "blade out". |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
I would not have thought this was possible
On Jul 18, 7:34*am, Franklin "Franklin
wrote: In other words, he has no brains. Exactly. I lost most of my brains after completing my CFII, A&P, and a Master's in mechanical engineering. Actually, I am going to nix "George" on here since there seems to be another. I George is reading this, my apologies for using George as my moniker and I am going to use a different Usenet I.D. here from now on...maybe Franklin! George (last post here as George) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A thought about handicapping....... | XYZ | Soaring | 22 | October 2nd 08 07:24 AM |
T-18 more roomy than I had thought it would be | Sliker[_3_] | Home Built | 11 | April 17th 08 04:04 PM |
Just when I thought I'd heard it all:-) | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 14 | November 23rd 05 08:18 PM |
A thought on BRS | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 47 | April 29th 04 06:34 AM |
I thought some of these are classics | goneill | Soaring | 0 | April 8th 04 10:51 AM |