A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Leaving Usnet Groups, Bye



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old May 4th 05, 07:48 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message

Guys like these are why Democrats don't win elections. Every

intelligent
thing a liberal leader says is undermined by some clueless jackass like
this


As opposed to all the clueless jackass Republicans? (Rush, O'Reilly, et

al)

Exactly. The only difference being, the jackass Republicans--which is
certainly not to say all Republicans are jackasses--are more convincing than
the jackass Dems.

Come on...both parties have plenty of clueless jackasses to go around.


Absolutely NO argument there.

Anybody know the Vancouver pilot that crashed in Portland, Oregon this
weekend?


Nope...I did find myself wondering if the airplane was a Cessna 150
though...


I catch your meaning. Looked to me that the airplane was green, but I
haven't seen much.

-c


  #162  
Old May 4th 05, 11:28 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"gatt" wrote in message
...
As opposed to all the clueless jackass Republicans? (Rush, O'Reilly, et

al)

Exactly. The only difference being, the jackass Republicans--which is
certainly not to say all Republicans are jackasses--are more convincing
than
the jackass Dems.


They've just had more practice at it. I don't doubt the Democrats will
polish their jackass act eventually.

[...]
I catch your meaning. Looked to me that the airplane was green, but I
haven't seen much.


Me either...only images I saw were on the nightly news, sounds similar to
what you saw. But all I caught was a tiny portion of what MIGHT have been
the vertical stabilizer. Hardly enough to ID an airplane.

Pete


  #163  
Old May 5th 05, 02:13 AM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message =
ink.net...
=20
=20
Kind of makes you wonder what it must have been like for Alan Shepard=20
sitting on top of that Redstone just before they lit it....put =

together by=20
government workers after being assigned the job of building it as the =

lowest=20
bidder for the contract.
:-))
Dudley Henriques=20


I thought Wally Schirra said that.

  #164  
Old May 5th 05, 02:52 AM
Rich Lemert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dudley Henriques wrote:
.......or what has come to be for me at least; the ultimate
mystery of Usenet......that being the existence of people out here who
actually will wait patiently for a particular poster they don't like to post
something....ANYTHING......and then check every word...every
statement......every meaning....in the twisted hope that the poster they
don't particularly like very well will make a mistake.....no matter how tiny
a mistake or error...that THEY can jump on immediately to use as "absolute
proof" that the object of their "exposure" is flawed!


Consider yourself lucky if they're actually waiting for you to post
something so they can try to embarass you with it. I've been a regular
in sci.research.careers, and they've got a guy over there who doesn't
even bother waiting for me to post something in order to mis-represent
my views.

Rich Lemert

  #165  
Old May 5th 05, 02:52 AM
Rich Lemert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dudley Henriques wrote:
.......or what has come to be for me at least; the ultimate
mystery of Usenet......that being the existence of people out here who
actually will wait patiently for a particular poster they don't like to post
something....ANYTHING......and then check every word...every
statement......every meaning....in the twisted hope that the poster they
don't particularly like very well will make a mistake.....no matter how tiny
a mistake or error...that THEY can jump on immediately to use as "absolute
proof" that the object of their "exposure" is flawed!


Consider yourself lucky if they're actually waiting for you to post
something so they can try to embarass you with it. I've been a regular
in sci.research.careers, and they've got a guy over there who doesn't
even bother waiting for me to post something in order to mis-represent
my views.

Rich Lemert

  #166  
Old May 5th 05, 03:00 AM
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...
"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
ink.net...


Kind of makes you wonder what it must have been like for Alan Shepard
sitting on top of that Redstone just before they lit it....put together by
government workers after being assigned the job of building it as the
lowest
bidder for the contract.
:-))
Dudley Henriques


I thought Wally Schirra said that.

Rockhound from "Armegeddon". The quote is usually a toss up between Schirra
and Grissom as to who actually said it. My guess would be Schirra. Sounds
just like something he would have said; great practical joker!
Dudley Henriques



  #167  
Old May 5th 05, 03:08 AM
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
news
On Thu, 05 May 2005 01:13:06 GMT, "John R. Copeland"
wrote:

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
hlink.net...


Kind of makes you wonder what it must have been like for Alan Shepard
sitting on top of that Redstone just before they lit it....put together
by
government workers after being assigned the job of building it as the
lowest
bidder for the contract.
:-))
Dudley Henriques


I thought Wally Schirra said that.


and I thought it was the private sector that bid on government
contracts, not "government workers".


Remind me in the future if I happen to state pi to extend it to it's maximum
just for this newsgroup's more intellectual readers.
Dudley Henriques


  #168  
Old May 5th 05, 03:19 AM
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rich Lemert" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:
.......or what has come to be for me at least; the ultimate mystery of
Usenet......that being the existence of people out here who actually will
wait patiently for a particular poster they don't like to post
something....ANYTHING......and then check every word...every
statement......every meaning....in the twisted hope that the poster they
don't particularly like very well will make a mistake.....no matter how
tiny a mistake or error...that THEY can jump on immediately to use as
"absolute proof" that the object of their "exposure" is flawed!


Consider yourself lucky if they're actually waiting for you to post
something so they can try to embarass you with it. I've been a regular
in sci.research.careers, and they've got a guy over there who doesn't
even bother waiting for me to post something in order to mis-represent
my views.

Rich Lemert


It's become more or less expected on these groups by many who post on them.
It's no big deal really, but it takes a lot of the fun out of posting and
eventually runs a lot of fairly well qualified and experienced people off
the groups, or as it has done in my case, turns them into totally hostile
posters.
My Usenet persona has come 180 degrees from when I first arrived on Usenet 6
years ago, especially on this group right here. I used to assume a neutral
or even friendly atmosphere from posters until shown otherwise. I now assume
a totally hostile environment unless I know the poster I'm dealing with (and
there are indeed some very fine people here) or the people posting with me
demonstrate to me that they are not hostile.
Dudley Henriques



  #169  
Old May 5th 05, 04:22 AM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 05 May 2005 02:08:25 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
dhenriques@noware .net wrote:


wrote in message
news
On Thu, 05 May 2005 01:13:06 GMT, "John R. Copeland"
wrote:

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
thlink.net...


Kind of makes you wonder what it must have been like for Alan Shepard
sitting on top of that Redstone just before they lit it....put together
by
government workers after being assigned the job of building it as the
lowest
bidder for the contract.
:-))
Dudley Henriques


I thought Wally Schirra said that.


and I thought it was the private sector that bid on government
contracts, not "government workers".


Remind me in the future if I happen to state pi to extend it to it's maximum


It's 22/7 You can't get closer than that. :-))

just for this newsgroup's more intellectual readers.


We have intellectuals on here?

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Dudley Henriques


  #170  
Old May 5th 05, 04:31 AM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 02 May 2005 16:08:12 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
dhenriques@noware .net wrote:

Actually, being retired, I really never give it a thought either way since I
won't be flying again. It's apparently only a big deal for a few specific
morons on Usenet. My family, my friends, my professional associates past and
present, and indeed even my country's government at the highest level seem
to be quite happy with things just the way they are.
Only on Usenet will one find the idiots an issue like this one will attract.


Oh, they exist IRL as well, but they can't hide behind anonymous
signatures so they are less prone to expressing themselves. It's far
more hazardous there. :-)) So they tend to talk among themselves
where they might find some one who will listen.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot; CFI; Retired
dhenriquestrashatearthlinktrashdotnet
(take out the trash :-)

"OtisWinslow" wrote in message
.. .
You can opt out of having your personal info appear on the
DB. Many who are active pilots do that.


"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
nk.net...


Actually, my curiosity has been piqued by all this nonsense being thrown
out here about not being on a data base. I've given the numbers back
channel to a select few friends on the group to research and see if they
can find out the exact reason why someone.....anyone...would appear or
not appear on the data bases.

Dudley





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So I invested my US$6°°.....GUESS WHAT!!!... less than ten days later, I received money [email protected] Owning 1 January 16th 05 06:48 AM
For Keith Willshaw... robert arndt Military Aviation 253 July 6th 04 05:18 AM
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM
U.S. military leaving Kuwaiti air base ~ Associated Press Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 October 21st 03 10:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.