I would not have thought this was possible

On Jul 13, 9:30*am, "Gary Mishler" wrote:
"Franklin" wrote in message

...





Ricky wrote:

On Jul 11, 11:23 am, Franklin wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_gpPbpONK4

Some people WANT to believe this even though they need only look at a
jet engine for 2 seconds to know it's fake.

"Franklin," why don't explain and entertain us with your theory behind
this being a fake.

How does "looking at a jet engine for 2 seconds" convince one to
believe this accident
was a fake?

Franklin, the serviceman being sucked into the jet on-deck was real,
very, very real.

Ricky

Hello sock. *Why doesn't your organ grinder ask the questions rather
than use his monkey?

For me, it's too amazing that a guy working next to an Intruder gets
sucked into one of its intakes with such massive force that it dragged
him off the ground but afterwards he doesn't have any crush damage from
jamming between the bullet cone and cowling and doesn't look like he
been squeezed hard up against the stator vanes.

http://www.imageno.com/k3bfdhgc73i0pic.html
http://images.marketworks.com/hi/72/72196/KL37C03.jpg

Maybe he's supposed to have squeezed through the low bypass compressor
bleed channel to come out unscathed. *Heh heh! *Let's have that 2 second
look at what those J52s on an Intruder really looks like ...

http://www.imageno.com/pyopisgsihhtpic.html

OK, so what passed through the engine to cause the rear flash in the
vid? *If anything solid went through that turbofan there'd likely be a
blade-out which looks very different to the brief flare out in the vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcALjMJbAvU

The vid shows our hero posing for a photo only hours afterwards. *No
shock, no crushed shoulders, no broken ribs, no split skull, no broken
nose. *Seemed to me the vid showed the mannequin had a floppy thigh bone
but the guy looks fine afterwards, no bloodied clothing, no major
abrasions. ... *Just an arm sling and a bandage for a head graze. *Gimme
a break. *He would be undergoing tests in ICU for the rest of the day
and may be the day after that as well.

A few hours afterwards he wouldn't be posing with his pals but he'd be
filling in incidence reports, the safety officer would be going berserk
and the carrier's senior officers would be doing some interviewing.

The vid's date is Feb 20 1991 but the quality looks like it's from the
1960s. Most vids from 1991 are in color. Try frame advancing the spoof
using this AVI rather than an FLV:

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...s/sucked%20in%
20engine.avi

Certainly there are fake videos in the world. *This one however is real.. *It
has been featured on network news magazines (Don't know if it was 60
Minuites, Nightline, or what). *It also is used as a training film in the
military and most major airlines.
This one is real.

I am almost positive that is was all done on a sound stage just look
at the shadows!

Kidding yes that is a very real incident.

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:52:38 -0700 (PDT), Ricky wrote:

On Jul 13, 9:56*am, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

Again, explain how this is fake, too.

Ricky

I don't have the time to explain the obvious, Monkey Heh!

I knew you couldn't...or wouldn't, because they are real.

Monkey, if you think they are real, then you have confirmed that you are
an idiot.

The guy getting lifted into the A-6 engine is authentic, it did
happen and you are mistaken if you believe otherwise.
As a mechanic I have heard extensive coverage of this
story; it is widely used in training applications both civilian
& military.

Idiot.

The aerobatic plane landing after a wing departure is fake.

That was real.

You may call me any name you wish...it will only reinforce
the fact that you need to grow up.

Ricky

Thanks, Idiot.

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:50:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 12, 10:19 pm, Mike Ash wrote:

Huh, I never would have guessed. Even a relatively (compared to a 172)
light single-place glider has wings much heavier than that. Maybe
that'll teach me to generalize where it's not appropriate.

However, doesn't that assume that it's empty of fuel? I assume having
fuel in the tanks would change the picture substantially.

Even full fuel wouldn't change it much. 25 gallons of fuel weighs
150 lbs, right over the mainwheel. The 300-lb engine is well inside
that wheel, as well as the rest of the fuselage. You'd have to hang
yourself off the wingtip to get any tip.

Dan

Dan, Mike's not a *real* pilot like you and I.

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:30:47 GMT, Gary Mishler wrote:

"Franklin" wrote in message
...
Ricky wrote:

On Jul 11, 11:23 am, Franklin wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_gpPbpONK4

Some people WANT to believe this even though they need only look at a
jet engine for 2 seconds to know it's fake.


"Franklin," why don't explain and entertain us with your theory behind
this being a fake.

How does "looking at a jet engine for 2 seconds" convince one to
believe this accident
was a fake?

Franklin, the serviceman being sucked into the jet on-deck was real,
very, very real.

Ricky


Hello sock. Why doesn't your organ grinder ask the questions rather
than use his monkey?

For me, it's too amazing that a guy working next to an Intruder gets
sucked into one of its intakes with such massive force that it dragged
him off the ground but afterwards he doesn't have any crush damage from
jamming between the bullet cone and cowling and doesn't look like he
been squeezed hard up against the stator vanes.

http://www.imageno.com/k3bfdhgc73i0pic.html
http://images.marketworks.com/hi/72/72196/KL37C03.jpg


Maybe he's supposed to have squeezed through the low bypass compressor
bleed channel to come out unscathed. Heh heh! Let's have that 2 second
look at what those J52s on an Intruder really looks like ...

http://www.imageno.com/pyopisgsihhtpic.html


OK, so what passed through the engine to cause the rear flash in the
vid? If anything solid went through that turbofan there'd likely be a
blade-out which looks very different to the brief flare out in the vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcALjMJbAvU


The vid shows our hero posing for a photo only hours afterwards. No
shock, no crushed shoulders, no broken ribs, no split skull, no broken
nose. Seemed to me the vid showed the mannequin had a floppy thigh bone
but the guy looks fine afterwards, no bloodied clothing, no major
abrasions. ... Just an arm sling and a bandage for a head graze. Gimme
a break. He would be undergoing tests in ICU for the rest of the day
and may be the day after that as well.

A few hours afterwards he wouldn't be posing with his pals but he'd be
filling in incidence reports, the safety officer would be going berserk
and the carrier's senior officers would be doing some interviewing.

The vid's date is Feb 20 1991 but the quality looks like it's from the
1960s. Most vids from 1991 are in color. Try frame advancing the spoof
using this AVI rather than an FLV:

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...s/sucked%20in%
20engine.avi

Certainly there are fake videos in the world. This one however is real. It
has been featured on network news magazines (Don't know if it was 60
Minuites, Nightline, or what). It also is used as a training film in the
military and most major airlines.
This one is real.

You're full of it. I explained once and once was enough.

Franklin "Franklin wrote:
I explained once and once was enough.

Thank goodness for small favors.

In article ,
Franklin "Franklin wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:50:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 12, 10:19 pm, Mike Ash wrote:

Huh, I never would have guessed. Even a relatively (compared to a 172)
light single-place glider has wings much heavier than that. Maybe
that'll teach me to generalize where it's not appropriate.

However, doesn't that assume that it's empty of fuel? I assume having
fuel in the tanks would change the picture substantially.

Even full fuel wouldn't change it much. 25 gallons of fuel weighs
150 lbs, right over the mainwheel. The 300-lb engine is well inside
that wheel, as well as the rest of the fuselage. You'd have to hang
yourself off the wingtip to get any tip.

Dan, Mike's not a *real* pilot like you and I.

It's true! Unlike real pilots, I perform every takeoff and initial
climbout in close formation with another plane. I use wits and weather
to stay aloft rather than fuel. And I never, ever go around.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon

On Jul 14, 9:45*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

I don't have the time to explain the obvious, Monkey Heh!

Monkey, if you think they are real, then you have confirmed that you are
an idiot.

Idiot.

Thanks, Idiot.

I rest my case.

BTW does your mommy & daddy know you are using the computer?

Ricky

In article
,
Ricky wrote:

On Jul 14, 9:45*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

I don't have the time to explain the obvious, Monkey Heh!

Monkey, if you think they are real, then you have confirmed that you are
an idiot.

Idiot.

Thanks, Idiot.

I rest my case.

BTW does your mommy & daddy know you are using the computer?

Ricky

No, but when they find out, they're going to be *****ed*.

It'll be grounded for a month, and no ice cream for dinner.

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:00:34 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In article
,
Ricky wrote:

On Jul 14, 9:45*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

I don't have the time to explain the obvious, Monkey Heh!

Monkey, if you think they are real, then you have confirmed that you are
an idiot.

Idiot.

Thanks, Idiot.

I rest my case.

BTW does your mommy & daddy know you are using the computer?

Ricky

No, but when they find out, they're going to be *****ed*.

It'll be grounded for a month, and no ice cream for dinner.

For your sad info, my mother and father bothpassed dies before I was
born. I was raised as an Army intelligence brat, *FYI* if you get my
strong drift, Monkies.

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:13:12 -0400, Mike Ash wrote:

In article ,
Franklin "Franklin wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:50:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 12, 10:19 pm, Mike Ash wrote:

Huh, I never would have guessed. Even a relatively (compared to a 172)
light single-place glider has wings much heavier than that. Maybe
that'll teach me to generalize where it's not appropriate.

However, doesn't that assume that it's empty of fuel? I assume having
fuel in the tanks would change the picture substantially.

Even full fuel wouldn't change it much. 25 gallons of fuel weighs
150 lbs, right over the mainwheel. The 300-lb engine is well inside
that wheel, as well as the rest of the fuselage. You'd have to hang
yourself off the wingtip to get any tip.

Dan, Mike's not a *real* pilot like you and I.

It's true! Unlike real pilots, I perform every takeoff and initial
climbout in close formation with another plane. I use wits and weather
to stay aloft rather than fuel. And I never, ever go around.

Too bad no one trusts you with powered flight.