Can I check something with you guys

http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.



They look the same to me.

--
--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.

The attachment size is 116k, but the size of the image on the website is
76k. I can't distinguish the difference visually.

Richard

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.

I don't know the technical terms but this is what it looks like to me: when
I see the image in Outlook Express it's smaller (27x15 cm or so) because I
have the folders column on the left hand side of the screen. If I open it
then I get a full screen image of about 33x22 cms). Going to the Warbirdz
site it opens as a 32 x 20 cm image. The Warbirdz image is the better of
the three from a viewer's perspective. Does the dpi change? I dunno. I
just know what looks good. Maybe the key is that on thw Warbirdz site it's
a largepic and for the newsgroup it's downsized to save bandwidth.
That's why we visit both locations. Show us a good photo in the newsgroup
and we know it's better on Warbirdz.
It's not something that jumps out to people. You are trying to make us
think.......
Regards from Pensacola, Tom

"Richard Connell" wrote in message
...
The attachment size is 116k, but the size of the image on the website is
76k. I can't distinguish the difference visually.

Richard

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.

In article ,
"Glenn" wrote:

They look the same to me. Viewed using MT-Newswatcher and Safari on an
Intel Mac/OS10.4.10

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.

It looks to me that the one that you posted with
your question is not as fuzzy as the one posted to the url.
IMHO anyway.

Robert

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.


The monitor will have more impact on how you see the pictures. on my
viewsonic hi-res flat panel, I can tell th edifference between these two
copies, but only barely. The one on the webpage shows some evidence of
compression, but you have to look real hard to see it. I had to move both
images directly over each other and toggle the windows to see the changes.


Luke

Glenn wrote:
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously
compressed but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.



The photo at the website appears to be a mite bit sharper to me...

JT

I am doing the same thing that Tom Callahan did, except, my computer is
connected to my Sony 1080 HD TV. I even blew them bot up to 200 %, where
they start to fall apart, and they still look the same to me.
Ron

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.

"Glenn" wrote:

http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.

I'm viewing your "direct" image in IrfanView and the Warbirdz.net
image in IE7, using a Dell hi-rez flatscreen. I've overlapped them to
compare various parts of the pictures, such as the Opera House in the
lower left, and I'm unable to see any difference between them. Hope
that helps...

MomDude