A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Congress promotes Billy Mitchell to Major General



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12  
Old October 13th 03, 06:20 AM
George Z. Bush
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...
Yes, and he was also courts-martialled for insisting that airpower alone
could
win a war


No, he was court martialled (and rightfully so) for publically accusing both
the President (Calvin Coolidge) and Congress of treason in what he believed

was
their negligence in managing and funding the US Army Air Corps and aviation in
general.

I believe the crash of a US Navy dirigible was what prompted him to make the
remarks to a national newspaper.


Mitchell continued to publicly press for a separate air arm after some half
dozen obsolete naval war vessels had been sunk by air attack in various tests.
This is what the Air Force Museum's home page says about his courts-martial:

"The success of the bombing trials encouraged the supporters of a separate air
arm to press even harder for their objectives but the Army General Staff
remained firm in its belief that airpower, acting independently, could not win a
war. Mitchell became increasingly critical of his superiors until his public
statements could no longer be condoned. In Dec. 1925 he was found guilty before
a court-martial of violating the all-inclusive 96th Article of War and was
suspended from duty for five years. In 1926, Mitchell resigned from the
service."

George Z.


  #13  
Old October 13th 03, 02:13 PM
Rich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ...

... When all was said and done, however, he was awarded a posthumous CMH
in 1946 for his conceptual contributions towards winning WWII.

George Z.


Not to be confused with THE Medal of Honor, see:

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/histo...wwi/bmcmoh.htm

A special congressional medal to honor Mitchell, not The Medal of Honor.

Regards,

R
  #14  
Old October 13th 03, 03:28 PM
George Z. Bush
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Rich" wrote in message
m...
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message

...

... When all was said and done, however, he was awarded a posthumous CMH
in 1946 for his conceptual contributions towards winning WWII.

George Z.


Not to be confused with THE Medal of Honor, see:

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/histo...wwi/bmcmoh.htm

A special congressional medal to honor Mitchell, not The Medal of Honor.


Point taken. I will no longer confuse it with the regular Congressional Medal
of Honor. (^-^)))

George Z.


  #15  
Old October 14th 03, 04:03 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"George Z. Bush" writes:

"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...
Yes, and he was also courts-martialled for insisting that airpower alone
could
win a war


No, he was court martialled (and rightfully so) for publically accusing both
the President (Calvin Coolidge) and Congress of treason in what he believed

was
their negligence in managing and funding the US Army Air Corps and aviation in
general.

I believe the crash of a US Navy dirigible was what prompted him to make the
remarks to a national newspaper.


Mitchell continued to publicly press for a separate air arm after some half
dozen obsolete naval war vessels had been sunk by air attack in various tests.
This is what the Air Force Museum's home page says about his courts-martial:

"The success of the bombing trials encouraged the supporters of a separate air
arm to press even harder for their objectives but the Army General Staff
remained firm in its belief that airpower, acting independently, could not win a
war. Mitchell became increasingly critical of his superiors until his public
statements could no longer be condoned. In Dec. 1925 he was found guilty before
a court-martial of violating the all-inclusive 96th Article of War and was
suspended from duty for five years. In 1926, Mitchell resigned from the
service."


G.Z.,
The bombing tests were several years before the Court Martial. The
charges had nothing to do with his pressing for a separate air
force. That was, while irritatiing, tolerable. The proximate casue
of the charges was that after the loss of the Navy's rigid airship
Shenandoah (ZR-1), in a line squall over the midwest during a
publicity tour, He'd made his statements referring to the President,
the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of War, and the Admiralty
as traitors. (It _was_ an emotional event - the Captain of the
Shenandoah was a personal friend of Mitchell, and had advised
against the trip as too risky during that time of year. The airship
captain's non-aviator superiors ordered him out anyway.) After the
initial statements, MItchell was ordered to not make any uncleared
public statements, but continued to do so. This prompted teh
charges of insubordination.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
  #16  
Old October 14th 03, 05:37 AM
George Z. Bush
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Stickney wrote:
In article ,
"George Z. Bush" writes:

"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...
Yes, and he was also courts-martialled for insisting that airpower alone
could
win a war

No, he was court martialled (and rightfully so) for publically accusing both
the President (Calvin Coolidge) and Congress of treason in what he believed
was their negligence in managing and funding the US Army Air Corps and
aviation in general.

I believe the crash of a US Navy dirigible was what prompted him to make the
remarks to a national newspaper.


Mitchell continued to publicly press for a separate air arm after some half
dozen obsolete naval war vessels had been sunk by air attack in various
tests. This is what the Air Force Museum's home page says about his
courts-martial:

"The success of the bombing trials encouraged the supporters of a separate
air arm to press even harder for their objectives but the Army General Staff
remained firm in its belief that airpower, acting independently, could not
win a war. Mitchell became increasingly critical of his superiors until his
public statements could no longer be condoned. In Dec. 1925 he was found
guilty before a court-martial of violating the all-inclusive 96th Article of
War and was suspended from duty for five years. In 1926, Mitchell resigned
from the service."


G.Z.,
The bombing tests were several years before the Court Martial. The
charges had nothing to do with his pressing for a separate air
force. That was, while irritatiing, tolerable. The proximate casue
of the charges was that after the loss of the Navy's rigid airship
Shenandoah (ZR-1), in a line squall over the midwest during a
publicity tour, He'd made his statements referring to the President,
the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of War, and the Admiralty
as traitors. (It _was_ an emotional event - the Captain of the
Shenandoah was a personal friend of Mitchell, and had advised
against the trip as too risky during that time of year. The airship
captain's non-aviator superiors ordered him out anyway.) After the
initial statements, MItchell was ordered to not make any uncleared
public statements, but continued to do so. This prompted teh
charges of insubordination.


Thank you for the enlightening details I don't recall ever having seen before.

George Z.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.