A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

US debt is higher now than during Depression



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 20th 04, 05:29 PM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default US debt is higher now than during Depression

The United States is shouldering a greater debt burden today than it
did during the Great Depression.


This seems a no-brainer. Everyone didn't have their hands out in the 1930's,
more people lived on farms, Johnson's Great Society was a socialist dream, etc.

The U.S. military was very small with as yet no global pretentions.

Seems like the nation was still on the Gold Standard, we couldn't just print
more money whenever we felt like it.

James Manchester (I think it was) relates a story of when Army Chief of Staff
Macarthur was called in to see President Roosevelt in 1933.

Roosevelt wanted Macarthur's rubber stamp on a plan to reduce the regular Army
officer corps from 12,000 to 10,000. IIRC, the military budget was @
$300,000,000.

"You may write such a budget, Mr. President. But I shall not administer it,"
Mac said.

Now, Roosevelt's mother lived in the White House to make sure her boy came to
no harm. FDR never - ever-- heard the word "no," from childhood.

So he and Macarthur had this tremendous row. FDR backed down. This, in my
view, was the best service Mac ever performed for the country.

After the meeting, Mac went out and threw up on the White House steps.

Nowadays, we just spend $500,000,000,000 -in a year- that we don't have, and no
one turns a hair.

Walt
  #2  
Old March 20th 04, 05:35 PM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This may or may not be true (I rather think it is false), but nota
bene:

It was not until we took on the much larger debt burden in World War
II that we got out of the Great Depression


Yeah, people don't realize, but the unemployment rate on 12/7/41 was @ 10%.

The war fixed all that.

Even in 1943, FDR's advisors were not worrying how to defeat the Japs and
Nazis.
Those *******s were toast.

The problem was what to do with 8 -10 million servicemen.

Cynical servicemen in that time frame had a saying:

"Golden Gate in '48,
breadline in '49."

Of course later that changed to:

"Home alive in '45."

The economic miracle that the Roosevelt administration provided (GI Bill, VA
loans, etc.) should not be forgotten.

No wonder the guy is on the dime.

Walt
  #3  
Old March 20th 04, 07:18 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
The United States is shouldering a greater debt burden today than it
did during the Great Depression.


This seems a no-brainer. Everyone didn't have their hands out in the

1930's,
more people lived on farms, Johnson's Great Society was a socialist dream,

etc.


And several million people were unemployed and many more living
in abject poverty.


Forgive me if I dont regard it as 'the good old days'

Keith


  #4  
Old March 21st 04, 10:46 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



The world population was 2.07 billion in 1930, 6.08 in 2,000


Yes, two billion is the figure I learned in school. For the U.S., it
was 140 million. The world has tripled but the U.S. has merely
doubled.

Funny, but when I look around me, it seems much more crowded than
that.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (requires authentication)

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #5  
Old March 29th 04, 05:09 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:25:29 GMT, "Gord Beaman" ) wrote:

(WaltBJ) wrote:

Sad but amusing to see people who haven't a clue try to draw
comparisons. BTW comparisons over time aren't worth a damn unless done
in constant value terms.
Now say something about aviation, like who's been rotating the engines
on all those parked jets over in Russia to prevent brinelling of the
bearings?
Walt BJ


I follow your meaning here Walt but what's "brinelling" indicate?


It is the effect that occurs when ball or roller bearings are not rotated
for a long period of time, resulting in differing levels of hardness
in the metal (the brinell scale is a measure of the hardness of a metal).

Al Minyard
  #6  
Old March 29th 04, 05:52 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Minyard wrote:

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 22:25:29 GMT, "Gord Beaman" ) wrote:

(WaltBJ) wrote:

Sad but amusing to see people who haven't a clue try to draw
comparisons. BTW comparisons over time aren't worth a damn unless done
in constant value terms.
Now say something about aviation, like who's been rotating the engines
on all those parked jets over in Russia to prevent brinelling of the
bearings?
Walt BJ


I follow your meaning here Walt but what's "brinelling" indicate?


It is the effect that occurs when ball or roller bearings are not rotated
for a long period of time, resulting in differing levels of hardness
in the metal (the brinell scale is a measure of the hardness of a metal).

Al Minyard


Thanks Al...wasn't familiar with that term...
--

-Gord.
  #7  
Old March 30th 04, 03:22 AM
Andrew Chaplin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

" wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote:

It is the effect that occurs when ball or roller bearings are not rotated
for a long period of time, resulting in differing levels of hardness
in the metal (the brinell scale is a measure of the hardness of a metal).


Thanks Al...wasn't familiar with that term...


"Brinell" is also used as a verb to describe what happens when a cone
or cup is marked by ball bearings during an impact. I learned about it
working in a bike shop in the early 70s -- always support the bottom
bracket axle when driving cotter pins from the cranks, especially when
working on Sturmey Archer stuff.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
  #8  
Old March 30th 04, 06:17 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andrew Chaplin wrote:

" wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote:

It is the effect that occurs when ball or roller bearings are not rotated
for a long period of time, resulting in differing levels of hardness
in the metal (the brinell scale is a measure of the hardness of a metal).


Thanks Al...wasn't familiar with that term...


"Brinell" is also used as a verb to describe what happens when a cone
or cup is marked by ball bearings during an impact. I learned about it
working in a bike shop in the early 70s -- always support the bottom
bracket axle when driving cotter pins from the cranks, especially when
working on Sturmey Archer stuff.


Yes, that makes sense also, the 'hardness' factor would be
evident here...thanks Andrew...
--

-Gord.
  #9  
Old March 31st 04, 05:57 AM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
Andrew Chaplin wrote:

" wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote:

It is the effect that occurs when ball or roller bearings are not

rotated
for a long period of time, resulting in differing levels of hardness
in the metal (the brinell scale is a measure of the hardness of a

metal).

Thanks Al...wasn't familiar with that term...


"Brinell" is also used as a verb to describe what happens when a cone
or cup is marked by ball bearings during an impact. I learned about it
working in a bike shop in the early 70s -- always support the bottom
bracket axle when driving cotter pins from the cranks, especially when
working on Sturmey Archer stuff.


Yes, that makes sense also, the 'hardness' factor would be
evident here...thanks Andrew...
--

Has anyone mentioned the term 'boxcar' as when the wheelbearings
of automobiles are damaged by the constant rocking during shipping?
That's the way I heard it explained.(once)

JK


  #10  
Old March 31st 04, 05:30 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Knoyle" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
Andrew Chaplin wrote:

" wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote:

It is the effect that occurs when ball or roller bearings are not

rotated
for a long period of time, resulting in differing levels of hardness
in the metal (the brinell scale is a measure of the hardness of a

metal).

Thanks Al...wasn't familiar with that term...

"Brinell" is also used as a verb to describe what happens when a cone
or cup is marked by ball bearings during an impact. I learned about it
working in a bike shop in the early 70s -- always support the bottom
bracket axle when driving cotter pins from the cranks, especially when
working on Sturmey Archer stuff.


Yes, that makes sense also, the 'hardness' factor would be
evident here...thanks Andrew...
--

Has anyone mentioned the term 'boxcar' as when the wheelbearings
of automobiles are damaged by the constant rocking during shipping?
That's the way I heard it explained.(once)

JK

No, never heard that Jim...makes sense though.
--

-Gord.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debt soars to a record Denyav Military Aviation 3 January 10th 04 02:25 AM
US external debt up to $6.494 tln George R. Gonzalez Military Aviation 5 January 8th 04 04:56 PM
0200A Higher Compression Cylinders? Boelkowj Home Built 3 December 16th 03 02:25 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.