A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

USS SAN FRANCISCO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 05, 10:49 PM
old hoodoo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Andrew C. Toppan wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:29:34 +1100, Jack
wrote:


That seems pretty harsh. I certainly don't know the facts, but wasn't
it a case of an uncharted obstruction? How can he be blamed for that?



He's not. He wasn't following some of the navigation/voyage planning
procedures, which, if followed....still wouldn't have prevented
running into an uncharted mountain. But the nuclear navy follows the
book, and if you get caught not following it, you will have a
problem....

--
Andrew Toppan --- --- "I speak only for myself"
"Haze Gray & Underway" - Naval History, DANFS, World Navies Today,
Photo Features, Military FAQs, and more -
http://www.hazegray.org/


A consise and straight answer from a reliable source. Thank you
Andrew.
I assume that several Captains/Commanders that have been previously
cutting corners have straightened up their act a bit. In the short run
a positive effect on the force overall...although the black eye will
remain for a while.
As a member of a beareaucratic organization the cutting of corners
is often defacto authorized by a middle management that turns a blind
eye, often out of necessity from unrealistic expectations of the top
brass, sometimes due to incompetence, sometimes due to downright
laziness...but when something goes wrong suddenly upper and middle
management will run for cover and the lowest but most visible supervisor
gets the axe, in this case the Captain/Commander. I doubt there will
probably be a strenuous examination of current practices overall in the
running of ships. The word will probably be to suck it up for a while
and cross every t and dot every i and then things will blow over.
Do I sound bitter? Maybe just disillusioned with bureaucracies
where mediocrity and deviousness is so lavishly rewarded and enthusiasm
and integrity is considered a nuisance.

  #2  
Old February 27th 05, 06:26 PM
BOB'S YOUR UNCLE
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Andrew C. Toppan wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:29:34 +1100, Jack
wrote:


That seems pretty harsh. I certainly don't know the facts, but wasn't
it a case of an uncharted obstruction? How can he be blamed for that?



He's not. He wasn't following some of the navigation/voyage planning
procedures, which, if followed....still wouldn't have prevented
running into an uncharted mountain. But the nuclear navy follows the
book, and if you get caught not following it, you will have a
problem....



And we thoight this was about Naval Aviation?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
San Francisco Fleet Week Vaughn Military Aviation 4 November 3rd 03 10:11 AM
San Francisco Fleet Week Vaughn Naval Aviation 6 November 3rd 03 10:11 AM
Business Aircraft & Jet Preview - San Francisco, CA - August 12, 2003 Mergatroide Aviation Marketplace 1 July 22nd 03 08:14 PM
Business Aircraft & Jet Preview - San Francisco, CA - August 12, 2003 Mergatroide General Aviation 1 July 22nd 03 08:14 PM
Business Aircraft & Jet Preview - San Francisco, CA - August 12, 2003 Mergatroide Owning 1 July 22nd 03 08:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.