A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is this the start of an aviation revolution? - Harbour Air has plans to electrify its entire fleet of small passenger seaplanes.jpg ...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 19th 20, 01:52 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Miloch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,291
Default Is this the start of an aviation revolution? - Harbour Air has plans to electrify its entire fleet of small passenger seaplanes.jpg ...

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2...g-a-revolution

Aviation is one of the fastest rising sources of carbon emissions from
transport, but can a small Canadian airline show the industry a way of flying
that is better for the planet?

As air journeys go, it was just a short hop into the early morning sky before
the de Havilland seaplane splashed back down on the Fraser River in Richmond,
British Columbia. Four minutes earlier it had taken off from the same patch of
water. But despite its brief duration, the flight may have marked the start of
an aviation revolution.

Those keen of hearing at the riverside on that cold December morning might have
been able to pick up something different amid the rumble of the propellers and
whoosh of water as the six-passenger de Havilland DHC-2 Beaver took off and
landed. What was missing was the throaty growl of the aircraft’s nine-cylinder
radial engine.

In its place was an all-electric propulsion engine built by the technology firm
magniX that had been installed in the aircraft over the course of several
months. The four-minute test flight (the plane was restricted to flying in clear
skies, so with fog and rain closing in the team opted for a short trip) was the
first time an all-electric commercial passenger aircraft had taken to the skies.

“It was the first shot of the electric aviation revolution,” says Roei
Ganzarski, chief executive of magniX, which worked with Canadian airline Harbour
Air Seaplanes to convert one of the aircraft in their fleet of seaplanes so it
could run on battery power rather than fossil fuels.

For Greg McDougall, founder of Harbour Air and pilot during the test flight, it
marked the culmination of years of trying to put the environment at the
forefront of its operations.

Harbour Air, which has a fleet of some 40 commuter floatplanes serving the
coastal regions around Vancouver, Victoria and Seattle, was the first airline in
North America to become carbon-neutral through offsets in 2007. A one-acre green
roof on their new Victoria airline terminal followed. Then in 2017, 50 solar
panels and four beehives housing 10,000 honeybees were added, but for McDougall,
a Tesla owner with an interest in disruptive technology, the big goal was to
electrify the fleet.

McDougall searched for alternative motor options for a couple of years and had
put the plan on the backburner when Ganzarski first approached him in February
2019. “He said, ‘We’ve got a motor we want to get certified and we want to fly
it before the end of the year,’” McDougall recalls.

The two companies found their environmental values and teams were a good match
and quickly formed a partnership. Eleven months later, the modest Canadian
airline got what McDougall refers to as their “e-plane” off the ground, pulling
ahead of other electric flight projects, including those by big-name companies
Airbus, Boeing and Rolls-Royce.

The project came together in record time considering how risk-adverse the
aviation industry is, says McDougall. “Someone had to take the lead,” he says.
“The reason I live in British Columbia is because of the outdoors: protecting it
is in our DNA. When it came to getting the benefits from electric flight it made
sense for us to step in and pioneer the next step.”

Electric flight has been around since the 1970s, but it’s remained limited to
light-weight experimental planes flying short distances and solar-powered
aircraft with enormous wingspans yet incapable of carrying passengers. But as
the threat posed by the climate crisis deepens, there has been renewed interest
in developing electric passenger aircraft as a way of reducing emissions and
airline operating costs.

Currently there are about 170 electric aircraft projects underway
internationally –up by 50% since April 2018, according to the consulting firm
Roland Berger. Many of the projects are futuristic designs aimed at developing
urban air taxis, private planes or aircraft for package delivery. But major
firms such as Airbus have also announced plans to electrify their own aircraft.
It plans to send its E-Fan X hybrid prototype of a commercial passenger jet on
its maiden flight by 2021. But only one of the aircraft’s four jet engines will
be replaced with a 2MW electric motor, powered by a combination of an onboard
battery and generator attached to a turboshaft engine, which still uses fossil
fuels, inside the fuselage.

This makes Harbour Air something of an outlier. As a coastal commuter airline,
it operates smaller floatplanes that tend to make short trips up and down the
coastline of British Columbia and Washington State, which means its aircraft can
regularly recharge their batteries. The company sees itself in a position to
retrofit its entire fleet of floatplanes and make air travel in the region as
green as possible.

This could bring some advantages. The efficiency of a typical combustion engine
for a plane like this is fairly low – a large proportion of the energy from the
fuel is lost as waste heat as it turns the propeller that drives the aircraft
forward. Electrical motors have fewer moving parts, meaning there’s less
maintenance and less maintenance cost.

Erika Holtz, Harbour Air’s engineering and quality manager, sees the move to
electric as the next major aviation advancement, but warns that one stumbling
block has been the perception of safety. “Mechanical systems are much better
known and trusted,” she says. In contrast people see electrical systems as a bit
unknown – think of your home computer. “Turning it off and on again isn’t an
option in aviation,” she adds.

But it’s the possibility of spurring lasting change in aviation that’s made
working on the Harbour Air/magniX project so exciting for Holtz. Aviation
technology has stagnated over the past decades, she says. “Although there have
been incremental improvements in certain technologies, there hasn't been a major
development change in aviation in 50 years.”

One area that requires further development is battery capacity. Many experts
doubt that large fully electric passenger airliners will be available any time
soon – current battery technology simply does not offer as many miles per kilo
compared to aviation fuel.

The power density in aviation fuel is high, in the neighbourhood of 12,000 watt
hours per kilogram. A lithium ion battery is only in the region of 200 watt
hours per kilogram.

Harbour Air’s short-distance flights on small, single and twin engine planes
have lower power demands which mean they don’t need heavy batteries. “Most of
our routes are within the range of technology that exists today,” McDougall
says.

This ability to use existing technology, including the 62-year-old Beaver
airframe and the Nasa-certified lithium ion batteries, means the certification
process to meet the Federal Aviation Agency and Transport Canada requirements is
expected to be easier than it would be with a plane built from the ground up.

Harbour Air hopes to get paying passengers in its eplanes in under two years.
“Canada isn't always known as an innovation centre,” says Holtz. “It's very
regulated and aviation itself is very regulated. But Transport Canada has been
trying to help us get through hurdles instead of putting them up.”

But Harbour Air’s efforts to electrify their fleet are unlikely to have a major
impact on aviation emissions.

“Two to 12 passenger aircraft are only a tiny fraction of global aviation
emissions,” says Lynnette Dray, senior research associate at University College
London’s Energy Institute. “Even looking at all scheduled flights under 500
miles (which are performed by many sizes of aircraft, most of which are much
bigger than two to 12 seats), less than 10% of global scheduled passenger fuel
use and CO2 emissions can be substituted.”

Where Dray sees the Canadian airline having a bigger impact is with public
perception. “There’s a lot of value in getting prototype models to market so
that the technology has a chance to become familiar and trusted,” she says.

Blazing a trail for other electrical aircraft projects has been a major goal for
Harbour Air and magniX. According to the The International Council on Clean
Transportation, aviation contributes an estimated 2.4% of global carbon
emissions with 24% of global passenger transport-related CO2 being attributed to
flights originating in the US. This should be a strong motivator for change,
says Ganzarski.

“I think the idea of electric aviation – getting rid of emissions and lowering
operating costs – is something that the worldwide community should embrace,” he
says. “The more companies get into it, the better. But we’ll be there right in
front, leading the way.”

The emissions from travel it took to report this story were 4kg CO2, travelling
by bus, train and car. The digital emissions from this story are an estimated
1.2g to 3.6g CO2 per page view.




*

  #2  
Old February 19th 20, 02:28 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,922
Default Is this the start of an aviation revolution? - Harbour Air has plans to electrify its entire fleet of small passenger seaplanes.jpg ...

Miloch wrote in
:

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2...plane-leading-
a-revolution

Aviation is one of the fastest rising sources of carbon emissions from
transport, but can a small Canadian airline show the industry a way of
flying that is better for the planet?

As air journeys go, it was just a short hop into the early morning sky
before the de Havilland seaplane splashed back down on the Fraser
River in Richmond, British Columbia. Four minutes earlier it had taken
off from the same patch of water. But despite its brief duration, the
flight may have marked the start of an aviation revolution.

Those keen of hearing at the riverside on that cold December morning
might have been able to pick up something different amid the rumble of
the propellers and whoosh of water as the six-passenger de Havilland
DHC-2 Beaver took off and landed. What was missing was the throaty
growl of the aircraft’s nine-cylinder radial engine.

In its place was an all-electric propulsion engine built by the
technology firm magniX that had been installed in the aircraft over
the course of several months. The four-minute test flight (the plane
was restricted to flying in clear skies, so with fog and rain closing
in the team opted for a short trip) was the first time an all-electric
commercial passenger aircraft had taken to the skies.

“It was the first shot of the electric aviation revolution,” says Roei
Ganzarski, chief executive of magniX, which worked with Canadian
airline Harbour Air Seaplanes to convert one of the aircraft in their
fleet of seaplanes so it could run on battery power rather than fossil
fuels.

For Greg McDougall, founder of Harbour Air and pilot during the test
flight, it marked the culmination of years of trying to put the
environment at the forefront of its operations.

Harbour Air, which has a fleet of some 40 commuter floatplanes serving
the coastal regions around Vancouver, Victoria and Seattle, was the
first airline in North America to become carbon-neutral through
offsets in 2007. A one-acre green roof on their new Victoria airline
terminal followed. Then in 2017, 50 solar panels and four beehives
housing 10,000 honeybees were added, but for McDougall, a Tesla owner
with an interest in disruptive technology, the big goal was to
electrify the fleet.

McDougall searched for alternative motor options for a couple of years
and had put the plan on the backburner when Ganzarski first approached
him in February 2019. “He said, ‘We’ve got a motor we want to get
certified and we want to fly it before the end of the year,’”
McDougall recalls.

The two companies found their environmental values and teams were a
good match and quickly formed a partnership. Eleven months later, the
modest Canadian airline got what McDougall refers to as their
“e-plane” off the ground, pulling ahead of other electric flight
projects, including those by big-name companies Airbus, Boeing and
Rolls-Royce.

The project came together in record time considering how risk-adverse
the aviation industry is, says McDougall. “Someone had to take the
lead,” he says. “The reason I live in British Columbia is because of
the outdoors: protecting it is in our DNA. When it came to getting the
benefits from electric flight it made sense for us to step in and
pioneer the next step.”

Electric flight has been around since the 1970s, but it’s remained
limited to light-weight experimental planes flying short distances and
solar-powered aircraft with enormous wingspans yet incapable of
carrying passengers. But as the threat posed by the climate crisis
deepens, there has been renewed interest in developing electric
passenger aircraft as a way of reducing emissions and airline
operating costs.

Currently there are about 170 electric aircraft projects underway
internationally –up by 50% since April 2018, according to the
consulting firm Roland Berger. Many of the projects are futuristic
designs aimed at developing urban air taxis, private planes or
aircraft for package delivery. But major firms such as Airbus have
also announced plans to electrify their own aircraft. It plans to send
its E-Fan X hybrid prototype of a commercial passenger jet on its
maiden flight by 2021. But only one of the aircraft’s four jet engines
will be replaced with a 2MW electric motor, powered by a combination
of an onboard battery and generator attached to a turboshaft engine,
which still uses fossil fuels, inside the fuselage.

This makes Harbour Air something of an outlier. As a coastal commuter
airline, it operates smaller floatplanes that tend to make short trips
up and down the coastline of British Columbia and Washington State,
which means its aircraft can regularly recharge their batteries. The
company sees itself in a position to retrofit its entire fleet of
floatplanes and make air travel in the region as green as possible.

This could bring some advantages. The efficiency of a typical
combustion engine for a plane like this is fairly low – a large
proportion of the energy from the fuel is lost as waste heat as it
turns the propeller that drives the aircraft forward. Electrical
motors have fewer moving parts, meaning there’s less maintenance and
less maintenance cost.

Erika Holtz, Harbour Air’s engineering and quality manager, sees the
move to electric as the next major aviation advancement, but warns
that one stumbling block has been the perception of safety.
“Mechanical systems are much better known and trusted,” she says. In
contrast people see electrical systems as a bit unknown – think of
your home computer. “Turning it off and on again isn’t an option in
aviation,” she adds.

But it’s the possibility of spurring lasting change in aviation that’s
made working on the Harbour Air/magniX project so exciting for Holtz.
Aviation technology has stagnated over the past decades, she says.
“Although there have been incremental improvements in certain
technologies, there hasn't been a major development change in aviation
in 50 years.”

One area that requires further development is battery capacity. Many
experts doubt that large fully electric passenger airliners will be
available any time soon – current battery technology simply does not
offer as many miles per kilo compared to aviation fuel.

The power density in aviation fuel is high, in the neighbourhood of
12,000 watt hours per kilogram. A lithium ion battery is only in the
region of 200 watt hours per kilogram.

Harbour Air’s short-distance flights on small, single and twin engine
planes have lower power demands which mean they don’t need heavy
batteries. “Most of our routes are within the range of technology that
exists today,” McDougall says.

This ability to use existing technology, including the 62-year-old
Beaver airframe and the Nasa-certified lithium ion batteries, means
the certification process to meet the Federal Aviation Agency and
Transport Canada requirements is expected to be easier than it would
be with a plane built from the ground up.

Harbour Air hopes to get paying passengers in its eplanes in under two
years. “Canada isn't always known as an innovation centre,” says
Holtz. “It's very regulated and aviation itself is very regulated. But
Transport Canada has been trying to help us get through hurdles
instead of putting them up.”

But Harbour Air’s efforts to electrify their fleet are unlikely to
have a major impact on aviation emissions.

“Two to 12 passenger aircraft are only a tiny fraction of global
aviation emissions,” says Lynnette Dray, senior research associate at
University College London’s Energy Institute. “Even looking at all
scheduled flights under 500 miles (which are performed by many sizes
of aircraft, most of which are much bigger than two to 12 seats), less
than 10% of global scheduled passenger fuel use and CO2 emissions can
be substituted.”

Where Dray sees the Canadian airline having a bigger impact is with
public perception. “There’s a lot of value in getting prototype models
to market so that the technology has a chance to become familiar and
trusted,” she says.

Blazing a trail for other electrical aircraft projects has been a
major goal for Harbour Air and magniX. According to the The
International Council on Clean Transportation, aviation contributes an
estimated 2.4% of global carbon emissions with 24% of global passenger
transport-related CO2 being attributed to flights originating in the
US. This should be a strong motivator for change, says Ganzarski.

“I think the idea of electric aviation – getting rid of emissions and
lowering operating costs – is something that the worldwide community
should embrace,” he says. “The more companies get into it, the better.
But we’ll be there right in front, leading the way.”

The emissions from travel it took to report this story were 4kg CO2,
travelling by bus, train and car. The digital emissions from this
story are an estimated 1.2g to 3.6g CO2 per page view.



As an electric car owner (2 of them,
actually) I am sold on the technology.
Now that battery weight has gone down
there is no reason not to put them in
airplanes and see what happens.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long EZ plans, Mini IMP plans, F4U Corsair plans, materials, instruments for sale reader Home Built 1 January 26th 11 01:40 AM
Plans for seaplanes David Findlay Home Built 5 January 4th 05 09:49 AM
FA: 6 AVIATION FLYING BOOKS - FAR, AIM, IFR, AOPA, P-47, Seaplanes... Nemo Aviation Marketplace 0 November 7th 04 08:11 PM
FA: 6 AVIATION BOOKS - FAR AIM IFR AOPA P-47 Seaplanes, etc. Larry Aviation Marketplace 0 October 27th 04 02:01 AM
Plans for a small tug/tow device for C172? DK Piloting 6 November 18th 03 04:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.