If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Lamers answers his own forged post above
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Lamers answers his own forged post above
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in newsud3k.1363$Jh7.671
@newsfe21.lga: Really? Got proof k00kie boi? Bertie |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Lamers answers his own forged post above
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:37:14 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip droned:
"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in newsud3k.1363$Jh7.671 @newsfe21.lga: Really? Got proof k00kie boi? OMGss. Maxwell could challenge Patriot Games for CNOTM... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Lamers answers his own forged post above
Maxwell Isn't Smart wrote in
news On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:37:14 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip droned: "Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in newsud3k.1363$Jh7.671 @newsfe21.lga: Really? Got proof k00kie boi? OMGss. Maxwell could challenge Patriot Games for CNOTM... Is that a nomination? Bertie |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:41:38 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
§ñühwØ£f wrote in news On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:26:50 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühw¤£f wrote in news:g2hiji$inn$7 @registered.motzarella.org: Max Isn't Well luv2^fly99@live.^com : In article , §ñühwØ£f says... On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:03:09 +0000, TransWench wrote: I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, rec.crafts.metalworking, misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to ZeD: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote: Aratzio says... On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "RD (The Sandman)" got double secret probation for writing: Aratzio wrote: biggus snippus I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon. I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a media term used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes. They fire a medium powered round one shot at a time just like a revolver. Now, if you wish to use the term "assault rifle" that is an actual term that describes *full* auto capable weaponry like what is actually used by the military. Full auto weaponry has been controlled by federal law since 1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in some states. The media also uses this term incorrectly in describing what are assault "weapons". Specific types of military grade weapons should be tightly controlled. They are.....like since 1934. And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons is legal. 'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT specify semi-automatic arms or even small arms. The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the citizenry with protection from the government, I an entitled to any weapon they have. That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing to fear from their government. I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something* about the foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the rate you're "mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a week or two after Way Too ****ing Late. Yep, it'll happen the First of Never. The gubamint dosent care if merikins have guns since they know that the military could crush any "revolution" that might happen. its a false sense of freedums that merikins share. Like the idea that their vote actually counts The last American whose vote actually counted was Lee Harvey Oswald blink I dont think a slug counts as a "vote". in a lot of the world it certainly does! Bertie You've been spending too much time in Myanmar... Well, i have spent a lot of time in the third world, and election time in a lot of it means a coup, but the so-called first world is often about three weeks from martial law. I'm still astonished as to how few repercussions did arise form 9-11, in fact. Your ideas interest me. Elaborate. Some other nations that look entirely stable are less so than one might imagine, IMO. I'm not gonna worry, though! Bertie It wont get you cheeper gas, thats for sure. -- http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/09/...-against-bush/ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
§ñühwØ£f wrote in
news On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:41:38 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühwØ£f wrote in news On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:26:50 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühw¤£f wrote in news:g2hiji$inn$7 @registered.motzarella.org: Max Isn't Well luv2^fly99@live.^com : In article , §ñühwØ£f says... On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:03:09 +0000, TransWench wrote: I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, rec.crafts.metalworking, misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to ZeD: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote: Aratzio says... On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "RD (The Sandman)" got double secret probation for writing: Aratzio wrote: biggus snippus I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon. I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a media term used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes. They fire a medium powered round one shot at a time just like a revolver. Now, if you wish to use the term "assault rifle" that is an actual term that describes *full* auto capable weaponry like what is actually used by the military. Full auto weaponry has been controlled by federal law since 1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in some states. The media also uses this term incorrectly in describing what are assault "weapons". Specific types of military grade weapons should be tightly controlled. They are.....like since 1934. And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons is legal. 'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT specify semi-automatic arms or even small arms. The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the citizenry with protection from the government, I an entitled to any weapon they have. That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing to fear from their government. I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something* about the foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the rate you're "mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a week or two after Way Too ****ing Late. Yep, it'll happen the First of Never. The gubamint dosent care if merikins have guns since they know that the military could crush any "revolution" that might happen. its a false sense of freedums that merikins share. Like the idea that their vote actually counts The last American whose vote actually counted was Lee Harvey Oswald blink I dont think a slug counts as a "vote". in a lot of the world it certainly does! Bertie You've been spending too much time in Myanmar... Well, i have spent a lot of time in the third world, and election time in a lot of it means a coup, but the so-called first world is often about three weeks from martial law. I'm still astonished as to how few repercussions did arise form 9-11, in fact. Your ideas interest me. Elaborate. Well, pick a well disciplined democracy of your choice. Not necessarily what some might call a sheeple state, but one that's orderly and with some reasonable amount of respect for the authorities. In times of crisis, in times of fear, people look to those authorities for direction. Theyh're accustomed to doing what they're told, so they'll di it,whatever it takes. Obvious. Anyhow, you get an incident and you get someone to demonise the characters you wish to direct your populace against and zipedee do dah, you have a war, or invasion or whatever other kind of lunacy you wish your populace to embark upon. Really, all that needs to be done is for some asshole, for whatever reason, to say "those ****ers over there are the cause of all your problems. just look at 'em with their funny food and weird music trying to mess us up, we gotta stop 'em" One study I read estimated it would take about three weeks to go from a quiet peaceful society to this stage. The more disciplined and coherent a society, the mor likely this was to be accomplished, a notion which has been borne out by history.. You might have heard of some of these experiments. The first is particularly scary. http://www.prisonexp.org/ http://www.age-of-the- sage.org/psychology/milgram_obedience_experiment.html There's footage of both of these experiments around the net, I beleive. Some other nations that look entirely stable are less so than one might imagine, IMO. I'm not gonna worry, though! Bertie It wont get you cheeper gas, thats for sure. Or make me any younger.. Bertie Bertie |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Lamers answers his own forged post above
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:55:42 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip fixed me with a
beady eye, and foamed wildly: Maxwell Isn't Smart wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:37:14 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip droned: "Maxwell" wrote: Really? Got proof k00kie boi? OMGss. Maxwell could challenge Patriot Games for CNOTM... Is that a nomination? Not from me -- I seconded PG... -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! Cthulhu fhtagn! mhm 29x21; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16 Chas. E. Pemberton; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13 Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4 COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2 Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18 "Life size models of Cthulhu, on sale now!" "Roe V Wade has zero bearing on my existence other than it affects it adversely." -- Johnny Wentzky never had much truck with "logic". Message-ID: "You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here. Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain." -- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID: "For the most part, morality is universal." -- John "Easily" Shocked "The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID: "Gay men deserve to die." -- John Wentzky, in Message-ID: "Laws count, the US Constitution count more, and we need to have judges on the bench who are going to Carry Out those laws, not Make Law or Interpret Law." -- John "Easily" Shocked contradicts his own words on the overriding importance of society's reluctance to accept homosexuality, in Message-ID: brIDe.67062$Qo.12613@fed1read01 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
§ñühwØ£f wrote in
news On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:14:17 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühwØ£f wrote in news On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:41:38 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühwØ£f wrote in news On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:26:50 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühw¤£f wrote in news:g2hiji$inn$7 @registered.motzarella.org: Max Isn't Well luv2^fly99@live.^com : In article , §ñühwØ£f says... On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:03:09 +0000, TransWench wrote: I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, rec.crafts.metalworking, misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to ZeD: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote: Aratzio says... On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "RD (The Sandman)" got double secret probation for writing: Aratzio wrote: biggus snippus I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon. I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a media term used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes. They fire a medium powered round one shot at a time just like a revolver. Now, if you wish to use the term "assault rifle" that is an actual term that describes *full* auto capable weaponry like what is actually used by the military. Full auto weaponry has been controlled by federal law since 1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in some states. The media also uses this term incorrectly in describing what are assault "weapons". Specific types of military grade weapons should be tightly controlled. They are.....like since 1934. And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons is legal. 'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT specify semi-automatic arms or even small arms. The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the citizenry with protection from the government, I an entitled to any weapon they have. That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing to fear from their government. I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something* about the foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the rate you're "mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a week or two after Way Too ****ing Late. Yep, it'll happen the First of Never. The gubamint dosent care if merikins have guns since they know that the military could crush any "revolution" that might happen. its a false sense of freedums that merikins share. Like the idea that their vote actually counts The last American whose vote actually counted was Lee Harvey Oswald blink I dont think a slug counts as a "vote". in a lot of the world it certainly does! Bertie You've been spending too much time in Myanmar... Well, i have spent a lot of time in the third world, and election time in a lot of it means a coup, but the so-called first world is often about three weeks from martial law. I'm still astonished as to how few repercussions did arise form 9-11, in fact. Your ideas interest me. Elaborate. Well, pick a well disciplined democracy of your choice. Not necessarily what some might call a sheeple state, but one that's orderly and with some reasonable amount of respect for the authorities. In times of crisis, in times of fear, people look to those authorities for direction. Theyh're accustomed to doing what they're told, so they'll di it,whatever it takes. Obvious. Anyhow, you get an incident and you get someone to demonise the characters you wish to direct your populace against and zipedee do dah, you have a war, or invasion or whatever other kind of lunacy you wish your populace to embark upon. Really, all that needs to be done is for some asshole, for whatever reason, to say "those ****ers over there are the cause of all your problems. just look at 'em with their funny food and weird music trying to mess us up, we gotta stop 'em" One study I read estimated it would take about three weeks to go from a quiet peaceful society to this stage. The more disciplined and coherent a society, the mor likely this was to be accomplished, a notion which has been borne out by history.. Having read 1984 again a few months back it seems to be the case for most of us "civilized" folks. You might have heard of some of these experiments. The first is particularly scary. http://www.prisonexp.org/ We studies that in psych class... Yeah, pretty stock stuff, I know. There was another one I saw footage of Where a young backpacker type would go up to someone on a mostly empty train and ask them if they would please move as he'd like to sit there. A remarkable number of people did. But when they had an older man in some sort of semblance of a uniform stand behind the backpacker, saying nothing, just looking at the person as the backpacker asked the same question, the number shot up dramatically. This was tried in several countries and the aforementioned anal retentive-no jaywalking-tidy lawn countries got the highest scores. http://www.age-of-the- sage.org/psychology/milgram_obedience_experiment.html There's footage of both of these experiments around the net, I beleive. http://www.new-life.net/milgram.htm Even the Simpson references this when they go to counceling and the family members are each given a button to push. Oh yeah, tha's right. I never connected the two. Some other nations that look entirely stable are less so than one might imagine, IMO. I'm not gonna worry, though! Bertie It wont get you cheeper gas, thats for sure. Or make me any younger.. Bertie Yew kids git offa my lawn... You give them a warning? Bertie |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:14:17 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
§ñühwØ£f wrote in news On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:41:38 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühwØ£f wrote in news On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:26:50 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: §ñühw¤£f wrote in news:g2hiji$inn$7 @registered.motzarella.org: Max Isn't Well luv2^fly99@live.^com : In article , §ñühwØ£f says... On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:03:09 +0000, TransWench wrote: I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights, rec.crafts.metalworking, misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to ZeD: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote: Aratzio says... On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "RD (The Sandman)" got double secret probation for writing: Aratzio wrote: biggus snippus I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon. I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a media term used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes. They fire a medium powered round one shot at a time just like a revolver. Now, if you wish to use the term "assault rifle" that is an actual term that describes *full* auto capable weaponry like what is actually used by the military. Full auto weaponry has been controlled by federal law since 1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in some states. The media also uses this term incorrectly in describing what are assault "weapons". Specific types of military grade weapons should be tightly controlled. They are.....like since 1934. And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons is legal. 'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT specify semi-automatic arms or even small arms. The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the citizenry with protection from the government, I an entitled to any weapon they have. That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing to fear from their government. I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something* about the foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the rate you're "mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a week or two after Way Too ****ing Late. Yep, it'll happen the First of Never. The gubamint dosent care if merikins have guns since they know that the military could crush any "revolution" that might happen. its a false sense of freedums that merikins share. Like the idea that their vote actually counts The last American whose vote actually counted was Lee Harvey Oswald blink I dont think a slug counts as a "vote". in a lot of the world it certainly does! Bertie You've been spending too much time in Myanmar... Well, i have spent a lot of time in the third world, and election time in a lot of it means a coup, but the so-called first world is often about three weeks from martial law. I'm still astonished as to how few repercussions did arise form 9-11, in fact. Your ideas interest me. Elaborate. Well, pick a well disciplined democracy of your choice. Not necessarily what some might call a sheeple state, but one that's orderly and with some reasonable amount of respect for the authorities. In times of crisis, in times of fear, people look to those authorities for direction. Theyh're accustomed to doing what they're told, so they'll di it,whatever it takes. Obvious. Anyhow, you get an incident and you get someone to demonise the characters you wish to direct your populace against and zipedee do dah, you have a war, or invasion or whatever other kind of lunacy you wish your populace to embark upon. Really, all that needs to be done is for some asshole, for whatever reason, to say "those ****ers over there are the cause of all your problems. just look at 'em with their funny food and weird music trying to mess us up, we gotta stop 'em" One study I read estimated it would take about three weeks to go from a quiet peaceful society to this stage. The more disciplined and coherent a society, the mor likely this was to be accomplished, a notion which has been borne out by history.. Having read 1984 again a few months back it seems to be the case for most of us "civilized" folks. You might have heard of some of these experiments. The first is particularly scary. http://www.prisonexp.org/ We studies that in psych class... http://www.age-of-the- sage.org/psychology/milgram_obedience_experiment.html There's footage of both of these experiments around the net, I beleive. http://www.new-life.net/milgram.htm Even the Simpson references this when they go to counceling and the family members are each given a button to push. Some other nations that look entirely stable are less so than one might imagine, IMO. I'm not gonna worry, though! Bertie It wont get you cheeper gas, thats for sure. Or make me any younger.. Bertie Yew kids git offa my lawn... http://www.simpsoncrazy.com/gallery/...s/news_198.jpg |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOTICE TO THE Supreme Court | Max Isn't Well | Piloting | 4 | June 9th 08 06:11 PM |
1st AMENDMENT PROTECTS TROLLS FROM BEING TOSed FROM ISP, SUPREME COURT RULES | Bertie the Bunyip[_24_] | Piloting | 8 | February 16th 08 04:32 PM |
Departure procedures notice | Jim Macklin | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | January 27th 07 02:57 PM |
China has taken notice it would seem | Mike Keown | Military Aviation | 8 | August 29th 03 07:09 PM |
China has taken notice it would seem | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 5 | August 29th 03 05:13 PM |