A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SR-71's sucessor



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 24th 03, 05:01 AM
fudog50
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey Tangent Engineering,,,please tell us what that had to do with the
original question???

On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:51:59 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Peter Kemp" peter_n_kempathotmaildotcom@ wrote in message
.. .
On or about Sun, 21 Dec 2003 17:04:23 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
allegedly uttered:


"Wayne Allen" wrote in message
...

"Gene Storey" wrote in message
news:B0qFb.3428$6l1.2442@okepread03...

You may not be aware, but most recce sats are nuclear powered, and

the
fuel to scoot them around does not have to be combustible.

I think your mixing two different power needs. If the birds are
carrying nuclear powered
energy cells that's simply for the electrical circuits. To move a
satellite requires propellant
(and it had better NOT be combustible) that once used cannot be

renewed.

An electric plasma engine can address your issue of electric propulsion.

A
teflon electric engine can fire many times.


You still need reaction mass, no matter how you're moving the vehicle
(unless you've got the mystical gravity drive).


The teflon becomes the reaction mass.


  #32  
Old December 24th 03, 02:17 PM
Peter Kemp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On or about Wed, 24 Dec 2003 03:54:45 GMT, Tank Fixer
allegedly uttered:

In article , Peter Kemp
peter_n_kempathotmaildotcom@ says...
On or about Sun, 21 Dec 2003 17:04:23 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
allegedly uttered:


"Wayne Allen" wrote in message
...

"Gene Storey" wrote in message
news:B0qFb.3428$6l1.2442@okepread03...

You may not be aware, but most recce sats are nuclear powered, and the
fuel to scoot them around does not have to be combustible.

I think your mixing two different power needs. If the birds are
carrying nuclear powered
energy cells that's simply for the electrical circuits. To move a
satellite requires propellant
(and it had better NOT be combustible) that once used cannot be renewed.

An electric plasma engine can address your issue of electric propulsion. A
teflon electric engine can fire many times.


You still need reaction mass, no matter how you're moving the vehicle
(unless you've got the mystical gravity drive).


Damn it Peter, now you've gone an done it.

Just wait patiently by the door for the men in black suits...


I would like to apologize for distressing the group by making false
statements about the alleged gravity drive, which everybody next
page knows does not exist. If such a drive did exist then of course
the United States Government next page would announce it to the
world and not try to keep it hidden. I am so ashamed by my words that
I will voluntarily and of my own next page free will refrain from
posting anything more to any groups for 7 years (or 4 if I behave
myself), subject to appeal. Thank you for your attention.

Prisoner no. 345098273, Leavenworth.
---
Peter Kemp

Life is short - Drink Faster
  #33  
Old December 24th 03, 10:44 PM
Tank Fixer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Peter Kemp
peter_n_kempathotmaildotcom@ says...
On or about Wed, 24 Dec 2003 03:54:45 GMT, Tank Fixer
allegedly uttered:

In article , Peter Kemp
peter_n_kempathotmaildotcom@ says...
On or about Sun, 21 Dec 2003 17:04:23 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
allegedly uttered:


"Wayne Allen" wrote in message
...

"Gene Storey" wrote in message
news:B0qFb.3428$6l1.2442@okepread03...

You may not be aware, but most recce sats are nuclear powered, and the
fuel to scoot them around does not have to be combustible.

I think your mixing two different power needs. If the birds are
carrying nuclear powered
energy cells that's simply for the electrical circuits. To move a
satellite requires propellant
(and it had better NOT be combustible) that once used cannot be renewed.

An electric plasma engine can address your issue of electric propulsion. A
teflon electric engine can fire many times.

You still need reaction mass, no matter how you're moving the vehicle
(unless you've got the mystical gravity drive).


Damn it Peter, now you've gone an done it.

Just wait patiently by the door for the men in black suits...


I would like to apologize for distressing the group by making false
statements about the alleged gravity drive, which everybody next
page knows does not exist. If such a drive did exist then of course
the United States Government next page would announce it to the
world and not try to keep it hidden. I am so ashamed by my words that
I will voluntarily and of my own next page free will refrain from
posting anything more to any groups for 7 years (or 4 if I behave
myself), subject to appeal. Thank you for your attention.


hehehehe

nice comeback.


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.