Hubble plug to be pulled

"Bernardz" wrote in message
news:MPG.1ac4364c296e75679899d8@news...
In article ,
says...

Most of the jobs that used to be done by the Hubble are done by
improved
Earth based telescopes today. Its mainly now used for spotting not the
major work.

The is no substantiated evidence of your opinion. While the Sedna (sp?)
discovery was made by Palomar (saw the motion across a star field),
there's
nothing that can compare with Hubble's unobstructed view. It's
examination
of the infant universe is unparalleled.

R / John




Until recently, NASA had planned to have the space shuttle return Hubble
to Earth for museum display.

And now there is no $billion to do that either.

I'm really going to stick my neck out here!
Considering the way fundamentalists have been able to stop valuable
stem cell research, being as they seem to have the *vote* presently,
what's the chance that these same "biblethumpers" have enough
influence to terminate Hubble, since it seems to contradict their
favorite theories?

Not theories, but infallible and inerrant FACT! By simply acknowledging
that the speed of light has been steadily decreasing over the 6 1/2 thousand
years or so of creation, it is easy to understand how cosmologists have
misinterpreted their findings ... age of the universe, distance to celestial
objects, etc. Also, by observing these "distant" objects in all quadrants,
Hubble has proven that its an earth-centric universe.

R / John

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:


"Guy Alcala" wrote in message
...
WaltBJ wrote:

"Pete" wrote in message
.. .

Which part would you play in Space Cowboys?
Eastwood, Sutherland, Jones or Garner?

Pete

Dumb question - Sutherland, of course.

But Sutherland wasn't a pilot, being essentially blind. Gee, you don't
suppose that may have
been related to . . . on second thought, it's probably better if we don't
go there ;-)

"It's none of your business"
John Kerry responding to an American Voter during a town hall meeting, March
2004


It's all according to what the question was I suppose...if it was
none of his business then I'd say it was a good answer...
--

-Gord.

"John Carrier" wrote:

I'm really going to stick my neck out here!
Considering the way fundamentalists have been able to stop valuable
stem cell research, being as they seem to have the *vote* presently,
what's the chance that these same "biblethumpers" have enough
influence to terminate Hubble, since it seems to contradict their
favorite theories?

Not theories, but infallible and inerrant FACT! By simply acknowledging
that the speed of light has been steadily decreasing over the 6 1/2 thousand
years or so of creation, it is easy to understand how cosmologists have
misinterpreted their findings ... age of the universe, distance to celestial
objects, etc. Also, by observing these "distant" objects in all quadrants,
Hubble has proven that its an earth-centric universe.

R / John



snort
--

-Gord.