A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Simulators
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MS FS 2004 ---minimum equipment for IFR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 20th 03, 03:29 PM
Gerald Sylvester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks everyone. Sounds like it is a go. For the joystick I'll
probably just spin by Fry's to check them out. The people here
said the same thing as my friend's regarding the instrument scan
(I've got a whole 5 hours of it during my PPL, I'm a pro
already.....grin). Tracking VOR's is easy. ADF same.
Will also help with ILS, HSI (none of the planes I flew had them)
and other techniques. I'll let you know how it works on my
1.8 GHz laptop.

thanks
Gerald


Gerald Sylvester wrote:

I just got my PPL and heard from some ATP rated friends that using
MS FS 2004 could help a bit for getting down some of the navigation
techniques for IFR. I figure for $50 that is about 25 minutes in
a IFR GPS equipped plane.

What is the minimum equipment *really* required to use MS FS 2004?
Right now I have a new Dell Latitude laptop. I have a mouse
and that is about it. Joysticks? Foot pedals (cost?)? I don't want
it to replace flight since I can just get in a real plane but I have
heard from many people that it is quite good. I want
it more for the instrument training.

I have no idea about this since the last MS FS I had was back when I
had an IBM PC jr. (no joke).

replies will be directed to: rec.aviation.simulators.

Gerald Sylvester


  #2  
Old December 21st 03, 03:19 AM
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you just got your PPL, you might want to spend some time flying VFR
before jumping into the IFR training.

From my experience, Flight Simulator can definitely help you with your
navigation techniques, but it almost definitely will NOT significantly
help you learn to precisely control the plane, regardless of whether you
use a yoke or the keyboard. It's just not real enough. At least that's
how it's been for me.

Where it helped me most was with VOR tracking, holding patterns,and the
like. When you read the books and see videos and all that, it kinda makes
sense. But when you open up the Map view, and turn on the feature that
draws the red line over your track, it makes a WHOLE lot of sense very
quickly.

The key is (IMHO), you first need to be able to keep the plane on heading
and altitude without requiring too much attention before you can start
also thinking about hold entries or approaches and following bouncing
needles and reporting positions and such...


Beyond that, for what it's worth, I wouldn't even worry about using 2004.
I use 98 and it works great. But 2002 has some ATC communication built in
I think, so that might be worth something. I don't really know about
2004, but MS generally has a policy of intentionally building new
versions that are bigger and hungrier than previous versions just to
force you to upgrade the computer and OS. So if you're not sure you have
the minimum equipment, you might consider finding an older version on
EBay or something.

Just my 2 cents.


Gerald Sylvester wrote in
link.net:


I just got my PPL and heard from some ATP rated friends that using
MS FS 2004 could help a bit for getting down some of the navigation
techniques for IFR. I figure for $50 that is about 25 minutes in
a IFR GPS equipped plane.

What is the minimum equipment *really* required to use MS FS 2004?
Right now I have a new Dell Latitude laptop. I have a mouse
and that is about it. Joysticks? Foot pedals (cost?)? I don't want
it to replace flight since I can just get in a real plane but I have
heard from many people that it is quite good. I want
it more for the instrument training.

I have no idea about this since the last MS FS I had was back when I
had an IBM PC jr. (no joke).

replies will be directed to: rec.aviation.simulators.

Gerald Sylvester



  #3  
Old December 21st 03, 03:32 AM
Dashi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The only place that he would be welcome is : alt. family.tree.doesn't.fork

Dashi

"An Metet" wrote in message
ster...
NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
--------------------------------------------------------

Speedbyrd squawked:

Maybe YOU should. You're the one that seems to have the problems. Hiding
behind a remailer.

The Speedbyrd :


Dude, you sure get around. First everyone killfiles you in alt.video.dvd,

last week you get
laughed out of alt.rec.guns, and now you're here. Keep trying, Dude. Maybe

you'll find someplace
that won't see you as a steaming turd that needs to be stepped over.






  #4  
Old December 21st 03, 04:04 AM
Geoffrey Barnes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Before I started flying for real, I was absolutely besotted with FS 2002.
But now that I've experienced the real thing, I almost never even fire it up
anymore. My club has a nice sim setup, with a yoke and rudder pedals, and I
have played with FS 2004 on that machine. Having rudder pedals is almost
certainly a necessity for anyone who wants to fly it for training purposes.
Witout pedals, it's really just an elaborate video game.

Good luck!


  #5  
Old December 22nd 03, 10:05 PM
MH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As a MS flight sim pilot for the past many years and revisions I can highly
recommend FS2004. Yes FS2002 is probably cheaper but i find that 2004 runs
much better on equavelant hardware and includes much more realistic GPS
units.

Figure for the cost of less than 1 hour dual, you can fly holds and
approaches until you're sick and with the new version you can even do it in
"real" weather. (the sim updates the weather off the Internet.)

Yes it's no replacement for real flying but it sure is cheaper and warmer
than the real thing right now

I use a MS force feedback joystick (twist the handle for rudder) and it's
okay. I'd consider that to be a minimum (A joystick with twist rudder)
Otherwise the sky's the limit. I've heard of some setups that take a whole
room to run. Of course that's not necessary just to shoot approaches.

my .02 worth, YMMV.

Mike



"Gerald Sylvester" wrote in message
link.net...

snip
What is the minimum equipment *really* required to use MS FS 2004?
Right now I have a new Dell Latitude laptop. I have a mouse
and that is about it. Joysticks? Foot pedals (cost?)? I don't want
it to replace flight since I can just get in a real plane but I have
heard from many people that it is quite good. I want
it more for the instrument training.
snip



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
24 Sep 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 24th 04 11:08 PM
Squawk Sheets Greg Esres Piloting 23 August 23rd 04 08:15 PM
Flying when you know there is something wrong with the plane C J Campbell Piloting 26 January 14th 04 04:38 PM
09 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 January 9th 04 10:05 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.