A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 28th 11, 12:58 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Joseph Testagrose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,259
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg



Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg
Views:	395
Size:	73.4 KB
ID:	52601  
  #2  
Old October 28th 11, 06:33 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Graham Harrison[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 154
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg


"Joseph Testagrose" wrote in message
...

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?

  #3  
Old October 28th 11, 10:27 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Graham Sheldon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg

And in USA markings?

"Graham Harrison" wrote in message
...

"Joseph Testagrose" wrote in message
...

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?



  #4  
Old October 28th 11, 10:50 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Andrew Chaplin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 728
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg

"Graham Sheldon" wrote in
ond.com:

"Graham Harrison" wrote in
message ...

"Joseph Testagrose" wrote in message
...

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?


And in USA markings?


From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch 2,000+ hp
(1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled three-blade contra-
rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's All the World's Aircraft
1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
  #5  
Old October 29th 11, 12:45 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 477
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg

On 2011-10-28 14:50:43 -0700, Andrew Chaplin
said:

"Graham Sheldon" wrote in
ond.com:

"Graham Harrison" wrote in
message ...

"Joseph Testagrose" wrote in message
...

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?


And in USA markings?


From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch 2,000+ hp
(1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled three-blade contra-
rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's All the World's Aircraft
1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."


There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
protruding low on the forward fuselage.
What were those hooked up to?

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #6  
Old October 29th 11, 01:52 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
John Szalay[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 364
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg - 1 attachment

Savageduck wrote in

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?

And in USA markings?


From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."


There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
protruding low on the forward fuselage.
What were those hooked up to?


Perhaps




Attached Images
File Type: jpg faireyp24.jpg (103.6 KB, 67 views)
  #7  
Old October 29th 11, 03:21 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Richard[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 156
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg - 1 attachment

On 10/28/2011 7:52 PM, John Szalay wrote:
wrote in

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?

And in USA markings?

From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."


There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
protruding low on the forward fuselage.
What were those hooked up to?


Perhaps



With the turbo charger attached to the crank case, what's the
possibility this was a two-stroke engine?


  #8  
Old October 29th 11, 03:22 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 477
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg - 1 attachment

On 2011-10-28 17:52:56 -0700, John Szalay john.szalayATatt.net said:

Savageduck wrote in

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?

And in USA markings?

From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."


There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
protruding low on the forward fuselage.
What were those hooked up to?


Perhaps


image


Thanks for that interesting bit of info. It seems that Fairy P-24
"Monarch", putting out 2000 HP, was experimental and only used on the
Battle as a test bed. Projected for use in the Tornado and the P-47,
and it never when into full production.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #9  
Old October 29th 11, 03:49 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 477
Default UK1 K9370 Fairey Battle 1942 WrightField.jpg - 1 attachment

On 2011-10-28 19:21:48 -0700, Richard said:

On 10/28/2011 7:52 PM, John Szalay wrote:
wrote in

That's not your average Battle. Contra rotating props?

And in USA markings?

From Wikipedia: "Battle K9370 was used to test the Fairey Monarch
2,000+ hp (1,490+ kW) aero-engine with electrically-controlled
three-blade contra- rotating propellers in 1939. According to Jane's
All the World's Aircraft 1946-47, the aircraft was shipped to the
U.S.A. after 86 hours test time."

There also seem to be a strange set of unexplained exhaust headers
protruding low on the forward fuselage.
What were those hooked up to?


Perhaps



With the turbo charger attached to the crank case, what's the
possibility this was a two-stroke engine?


With a turbo charger on each side it looks more like an "X-24"?
Probably one V-12 on top of an inverted V-12. No wonder the P-47 ended
up with the Twin-Wasp R-2800-59.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UK2 AE479 Messerschmitt BF109E3 1942-04orLater WrightField USAFPhoto.jpg Joseph Testagrose Aviation Photos 0 October 27th 11 12:39 PM
Britain Between the Wars, pt 3 - Fairey Battle.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman[_4_] Aviation Photos 0 January 20th 10 11:45 AM
Pulp Fiction, pt 4 - G eight and his battle aces 1942.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 April 6th 07 02:14 AM
Pulp Fiction, pt 2 - battle birds 1942 06.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 3 April 3rd 07 11:32 PM
Winter Flying, pt 2 - Fairey Battle.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 January 31st 07 12:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.