A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 7th 07, 03:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

Anybody have any experience with air conditioning in their plane-Nice
to have? Silly accessory? Don't leave home without it? 80% Summer
flying in Northeast.


Thanks for your opinion.

Andy

  #4  
Old July 7th 07, 08:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

In article ,
john smith wrote:

How much horsepower are you willing to sacrifice to stay cool on a hot
day when your piston engine is lacking 100% of its rated performance?


Normally, the AC is off during take-off and landing. So, the loss of horsepower
is usually not an issue.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

  #5  
Old July 9th 07, 09:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

On Jul 7, 8:11 am, john smith wrote:
wrote:
Anybody have any experience with air conditioning in their plane-Nice
to have? Silly accessory? Don't leave home without it? 80% Summer
flying in Northeast.


How much horsepower are you willing to sacrifice to stay cool on a hot
day when your piston engine is lacking 100% of its rated performance?


The AC is really only used on the ground to cool the plane when its
been sitting in the 110F sun. One airbourne the AC serves not purpose.

-Robert

  #6  
Old July 10th 07, 12:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 224
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

"Robert M. Gary" writes:


The AC is really only used on the ground to cool the plane when its
been sitting in the 110F sun. One airbourne the AC serves not purpose.



I have this picture in my head. At the end of the taxiway; there's a open
carport type shade struture. You pull under it & a cold-air hose drops
down, just like at a drive-in movie. You open the door and fish it in. A
large PA speaker has the tower freq so you don't even need the avionics
running to know when to restart....



--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
  #7  
Old July 12th 07, 09:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
cwby-flyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

On Jul 9, 3:26 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:

The AC is really only used on the ground to cool the plane when its
been sitting in the 110F sun. One airbourne the AC serves not purpose.

-Robert


Not sure where you're at, but around here GA is stuck at or below 3500
due the DFW Class B - and in the summertime we need to be at 8000 or
better to escape the heat.

Mike

  #8  
Old July 7th 07, 04:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
The Visitor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 231
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?

I have it and it is fantastic to have. It does weigh 70 pounds in the
Seneca. But it spits snow and makes the ride very very nice. Off for
take off and landing(incase of overshoot), single engine operation and I
think the book said expect a 2% power loss, but I don't notice any
really. I have never really regretted having it. Full fuel I can still
put in 750 pounds. The water drain for it is in out the tail cone and
often people mistake it for a fuel leak on the ramp. I suppose it would
be possible because the janitrol heater is in the tail also. But they
don't know that, they just see a puddle and are a bit alarmed.

I would have it again.

If you don't really need the usefull load, go for it!

John

wrote:
Anybody have any experience with air conditioning in their plane-Nice
to have? Silly accessory? Don't leave home without it? 80% Summer
flying in Northeast.


Thanks for your opinion.

Andy


  #9  
Old July 7th 07, 06:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Matt Barrow[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,119
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?


wrote in message
oups.com...
Anybody have any experience with air conditioning in their plane-Nice
to have?


VERY nice to have, especially if you use your aircraft for business.

Silly accessory? Don't leave home without it? 80% Summer
flying in Northeast.


For the northeast, definitely. 80% of our travel is in the mid-west, from
the Dakota's all the way to central Texas.

Our A/C unit is right at 40 lbs and is certified for operation in all phases
of flight. It puts out 23,000BTU of cooling and with a sun shade, drops the
cabin from over 100F to 75 in about 10 minutes. With Aux power, we can have
it on without the engine running, while we configure the nav systems.

Also, it has climate control, so the cabin is 75F when it's 105 outside, and
it will hold that all the way to altitude where it may be sub-zero.

Get it...enjoy it; you won't regret it.
--
Matt Barrow
Performance Homes, LLC.
Cheyenne, WY


  #10  
Old July 7th 07, 07:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
John Kunkel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 42
Default air conditioning- nice, required, or silly?


wrote in message
oups.com...
Anybody have any experience with air conditioning in their plane-Nice
to have? Silly accessory? Don't leave home without it? 80% Summer
flying in Northeast.


I had A/C in my Piper Arrow II and loved it. All of my flying buddies ragged
me for being a "pussy" but each of them changed their minds when noting how
nice it is to taxi in comfort after a heat soak in the sun (instead of
holding a door open against the prop blast) or a summer inversion layer
where it's hotter at 4500 feet than on the 90°F ground temps.

I've heard all the arguments, added weight, reduced horsepower, etc but you
have to know your mission, the weight/performance penalties aren't for
everyone.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Silly L/D stats Andy[_1_] Soaring 1 April 9th 07 05:14 AM
Silly controller Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 123 August 30th 06 01:56 AM
Saab 340 air conditioning? John Clonts Piloting 1 July 14th 06 05:00 PM
ELT Required for all SSA sanctioned contests starting 2006 ELT Required for all SSA sanctione Steve Leonard Soaring 2 September 14th 05 03:49 AM
Air Conditioning System for Homebuilts? JPAviation Home Built 18 February 6th 04 03:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.