If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil
http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media...pa20071880.pdf suggests the sun has no effect on climate. Or, that we we cannot presently correlate sun and climate. Or there is some interfering data swamping a comparatively small effect. If not the sun, how about our dirt? It lives, excretes, and is deep, to boot. Who understands zero gee fission? we are ice on a fireball. We are the snowball surrounding hell, walking around on a little insulating frozen rock floating on a lake of magma. Cheap renewable power? Geothermal, solar steam, wind, tidal. Real expense? Transmission, overpopulation? Private planes to eliminate highway congestion? The highway, be it asphalt or air, is no more than an extension of the parking lot. Are we gonna have sky garages 20 floors tall and elevator parking for excess idle Mohler sky machinery, or are we gonna take air taxis? How many pedestrians squashed by crashing cabs before we try dirigible busses, or living with parachutes in our office? I see city buildings before commuter conveniences. Land is limited. I see deep wells for Icelandic power, even air conditioning. I see tube trains surrounding volcanic artifacts linking ring of fire hot spots. I count the calories produced by cities in their warm spots with their reflective sky scrapers and steam pipes warmed by moving lightweight reflectors. I see wind power to produce compressed air, liquid nitrogen and ultimately, hydrogen to be burned on site to put power into the grid when needed. Can liquid nitrogen be used to operate a Stirling cycle engine or turbine warmed by ambient air? What is it's energy density next to gasoline or hydrogen? What about it's seasonal efficiency? Our oil problems are really political marketing. Terry K |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil
"Terry K" wrote in message oups.com... http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media...pa20071880.pdf suggests the sun has no effect on climate. I guess they never heard of "seasons". This paper refutes the above paper: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/im...e_lockwood.pdf |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil
On 31 Oct 2007 15:16:07 -0700, Terry K wrote:
http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media...pa20071880.pdf suggests the sun has no effect on climate. Or, that we we cannot presently correlate sun and climate. Or there is some interfering data swamping a comparatively small effect. The sun's effect is easily measured and has been for decades. It's done by a method called the "pan evaporation rate". The inconsistency is the pan evaporation rate has been going down for at least the last three decades or more. That would indicate the amount of energy from the sun reaching the earth has been steadily dropping for over 30 years. A Google search should give the process in detail. If not the sun, how about our dirt? It lives, excretes, and is deep, to boot. Who understands zero gee fission? we are ice on a fireball. We are the snowball surrounding hell, walking around on a little insulating frozen rock floating on a lake of magma. Cheap renewable power? Geothermal, solar steam, wind, tidal. Real expense? Transmission, overpopulation? Private planes to eliminate highway congestion? The highway, be it asphalt or air, is no more than an extension of the parking lot. Are we gonna have sky garages 20 floors tall and elevator parking for excess idle Mohler sky machinery, or are we gonna take air taxis? How many pedestrians squashed by crashing cabs before we try dirigible busses, or living with parachutes in our office? None of the sky routes are economical. A quick check will show some high rises in NY do have parachutes for emergencies although I'd not think they'd be practical. I see city buildings before commuter conveniences. Land is limited. I see deep wells for Icelandic power, even air conditioning. I see tube trains surrounding volcanic artifacts linking ring of fire hot spots. I count the calories produced by cities in their warm spots with their reflective sky scrapers and steam pipes warmed by moving lightweight reflectors. I see wind power to produce compressed air, liquid nitrogen and Liquid nitrogen is very inefficient as it takes a lot of energy to produce and the only energy you get out is the expansion from evaporation and expansion. ultimately, hydrogen to be burned on site to put power into the grid when needed. Hydrogen too is expensive to produce on a large scale and remain a viable economic alternative to gas, expensive to store and expensive to transport although not nearly as dangerous as most think. It also takes more energy to produce the gas than you can get back out of it. Liquefying it takes even more. However Hydrogen contains far more energy than liquid Nitrogen as you can use Hydrogen in combustion and produce a fair amount of clean energy. Can liquid nitrogen be used to operate a Stirling cycle engine or turbine warmed by ambient air? What is it's energy density next to gasoline or hydrogen? What about it's seasonal efficiency? Compared to combustible fuels it's very poor although I don't have the numbers right at my fingertips. Gasoline is considerably higher than Hydrogen due to all the carbon. Our oil problems are really political marketing. Only partially. Unstable sources, unfriendly sources, poorly accessible sources, long and expensive transportation routes, all lead to price sensitivity. It along with coal is also a big source of pollution. Roger (K8RI) Terry K |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:48:16 -0700, "Tom S."
wrote: "Terry K" wrote in message roups.com... http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media...pa20071880.pdf suggests the sun has no effect on climate. I guess they never heard of "seasons". This paper refutes the above paper: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/im...e_lockwood.pdf And this paper too appears to have some flaws. It ignores the Pan evaporation rate which has shown the amount of energy from the sun reaching the earth's surface has been going down for decades. Also it denies the major effect of CO2 while current scientists have overwhelmingly accepted CO2 as the prime driver. Still in the end the ONLY source for earth's energy we see does come from the sun with the exception of a small amount of leakage from the earth's core. Both papers have some serious conflicts with today's accepted theories. Roger (K8RI) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil | Gene Seibel | Piloting | 58 | November 2nd 07 04:50 AM |
I have an opinion on global warming! | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 89 | April 12th 07 12:56 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: CBS Spotlights Aviation's Effect On Global Warming!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 1 | August 3rd 06 07:24 PM |
Proposal For A New Rec.Aviation Newsgroup. (WAS: McCain in '08) | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 54 | July 24th 06 08:32 AM |
House proposal to restrict general aviation | C J Campbell | Piloting | 20 | March 3rd 04 02:37 AM |