If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATC of Near-Miss over BOS
Saw this over at LiveATC.net forums. Thought it may be of interest.
I thought the controller was very professional and avoided an over the air arguement nicely. http://www.liveatc.net/forum/files/k...r_miss_156.mp3 Marco Leon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Saw this over at LiveATC.net forums. Thought it may be of interest.
I thought the controller was very professional and avoided an over the air arguement nicely. http://www.liveatc.net/forum/files/k...r_miss_156.mp3 Got a time on this? We could watch it on http://www4.passur.com/bos.html if we did. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How does something like this get resolved? What is the accuracy of ATC's
transponder data? Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Jose" wrote in message
m... Saw this over at LiveATC.net forums. Thought it may be of interest. I thought the controller was very professional and avoided an over the air arguement nicely. http://www.liveatc.net/forum/files/k...r_miss_156.mp3 Got a time on this? We could watch it on http://www4.passur.com/bos.html if we did. Looking at www.aa.com shows flight 818 arriving at 00:34 on 8/24. Start watching about 00:18 and you'll see the MD80 and the Lear. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Michael 182 wrote:
How does something like this get resolved? What is the accuracy of ATC's transponder data? Within 50' either way. If you're at 1049', it'll show 1000'. Move up one foot and it'll show 1100'. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The replay seems to show the Lear did not level at 5,000.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Marco Leon (at) wrote:
Saw this over at LiveATC.net forums. Thought it may be of interest. I thought the controller was very professional and avoided an over the air arguement nicely. Wow... I listened to the transmission and watched the replay on passur.com, and have a question: if both planes respond to the controller that they have the other in sight, and the controller tells them to maintain visual separation (which it sounds like was done in this case), does that eliminate the standard IFR separation rules? It looks like the AA pilot was right in that the LJ came within 300 feet, but since they were both "seeing and avoiding", is that technically an FAR violation? i.e., was the controller still obligated to provide separation? -- Guy Elden Jr. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
john smith wrote:
The replay seems to show the Lear did not level at 5,000. You're right. Looks like he climbed right through the MD-80 altitude. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
john smith wrote
The replay seems to show the Lear did not level at 5,000. Nor was he required to since he had been cleared to maintain visual separation.....and separation is separation. One man's "near miss" is another's "missed him by a mile". Bob Moore |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Moore wrote:
Nor was he required to since he had been cleared to maintain visual separation.....and separation is separation. One man's "near miss" is another's "missed him by a mile". A few months ago I overheard something similar on Syracuse, NY's ATC feed. A regional Dash-8 was being vectored north around the airport for an approach while a student and instructor were flying some practice maneuvers just north of the airport. Normally the instructional flight would have been many miles further north, but there were low clouds in this designated practice area. The instructional flight was given a restriction to maintain at or below 2,000 feet and the Dash-8 was told to maintain 2,500 feet. ATC called the C172 traffic for the Dash-8 and the pilot of the Dash-8 replied he had traffic in sight. A moment later, the Dash-8 pilot called ATC to report that he was responding to a TCAS alert. He then made an unprofessional comment directly to the C172 stating that there was no way they were at their required altitude. ATC responded that through this entire event the C172 was at the altitude to which they were originally restricted. Given the unprofessional comment made by the Dash-8 pilot, it seemed to me that after calling traffic in sight, both pilots went heads down in preparation for landing and the TCAS alert shocked them back outside. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Miss DJ for sale! | Doug Jacobs | Soaring | 0 | September 14th 04 10:32 PM |
Miss May 2004. | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 8 | March 31st 04 04:00 AM |
Why an NDB approach with a miss to an intersection? | Ben Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | March 25th 04 03:53 AM |
Miss May 2004 | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 2 | March 21st 04 09:48 PM |
HE & HEI Rounds that miss, was British cannon ammunition | James Lerch | Military Aviation | 2 | December 29th 03 11:07 AM |