If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
I think someone here said that you really need a copilot when you fly
IFR. If so, what duties does the copilot have? I'd think that IFR would be no more work than VFR, especially since ATC is helping with directions and there is often some degree of automation (autopilot or something). So, what's the story in real life? Is it really more work to fly IFR, or more work to fly VFR? I'm thinking that VFR you must spend a lot of time reading charts and looking for landmarks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
Many of us who are rated for instrument flight are likely to tell you
real life flying under instrument flight rules is easier than VFRr. This is especially true in controlled airspace during the approach and landing phases of flight in congested airspace. In my view, if the conditions are soft IFR so that the VFR guys are on the ground, very much easier. I fly SEL with no co pilot in a Mooney 201 and find the workload very manageable. It's worth mentioning when I lived in New England about a quarter of my time was spent in IMC, and after hunderds of hours in the clouds and on the gauges, so flying by reference to instruments feels quite natural. Lower time pilots may feel differently. You might try getting into a real cockpit, much of what you've read here will become obvious then. On Oct 29, 3:01 pm, Mxsmanic wrote: I think someone here said that you really need a copilot when you fly IFR. If so, what duties does the copilot have? I'd think that IFR would be no more work than VFR, especially since ATC is helping with directions and there is often some degree of automation (autopilot or something). So, what's the story in real life? Is it really more work to fly IFR, or more work to fly VFR? I'm thinking that VFR you must spend a lot of time reading charts and looking for landmarks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
Tony wrote:
Many of us who are rated for instrument flight are likely to tell you real life flying under instrument flight rules is easier than VFRr. This is especially true in controlled airspace during the approach and landing phases of flight in congested airspace. In my view, if the conditions are soft IFR so that the VFR guys are on the ground, very much easier. I fly SEL with no co pilot in a Mooney 201 and find the workload very manageable. It's worth mentioning when I lived in New England about a quarter of my time was spent in IMC, and after hunderds of hours in the clouds and on the gauges, so flying by reference to instruments feels quite natural. Lower time pilots may feel differently. I agree. I file IFR for virtually every flight these days. One, it is easier in many cases than VFR. Opening and closing VFR flight plans requires talking to someone else ... twice. I usually request flight following when VFR, but sometimes I'm not able to get it in the northeast. Two, filing all of the time keeps me proficient in copying clearances and generally using the system. Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
Mxsmanic wrote:
I think someone here said that you really need a copilot when you fly IFR. If so, what duties does the copilot have? I'd think that IFR would be no more work than VFR, especially since ATC is helping with directions and there is often some degree of automation (autopilot or something). So, what's the story in real life? Is it really more work to fly IFR, or more work to fly VFR? I'm thinking that VFR you must spend a lot of time reading charts and looking for landmarks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. Since you are comparing IFR to VFR, I am assuming that conditions are VMC. If weather is not part of the equation, the answer depends on the complexity of the airspace you are flying. In complex airspaces, IFR is simpler than VFR because you don't have to worry about staying out of anyone's airspace. In less busy areas, VFR is simpler because you don't have to follow ATC assigned routes, or even talk to anyone. However, flying in IMC is more demanding than flying in VMC. When you throw weather into the mixture (icing, imbedded thunderstorm), then things get a lot more difficult than VMC. That's when having a co-pilot is an asset. Also note that VMC does not necessarily mean VFR. The vast majority of IFR flights take place in VMC. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
On Oct 29, 4:58 pm, "Andrew Sarangan" wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: I think someone here said that you really need a copilot when you fly IFR. If so, what duties does the copilot have? I'd think that IFR would be no more work than VFR, especially since ATC is helping with directions and there is often some degree of automation (autopilot or something). So, what's the story in real life? Is it really more work to fly IFR, or more work to fly VFR? I'm thinking that VFR you must spend a lot of time reading charts and looking for landmarks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.Since you are comparing IFR to VFR, I am assuming that conditions are VMC. If weather is not part of the equation, the answer depends on the complexity of the airspace you are flying. In complex airspaces, IFR is simpler than VFR because you don't have to worry about staying out of anyone's airspace. In less busy areas, VFR is simpler because you don't have to follow ATC assigned routes, or even talk to anyone. However, flying in IMC is more demanding than flying in VMC. When you throw weather into the mixture (icing, imbedded thunderstorm), then things get a lot more difficult than VMC. That's when having a co-pilot is an asset. Also note that VMC does not necessarily mean VFR. The vast majority of IFR flights take place in VMC. Hello, first time poster here. I think it is worth noting that the Mooney 201 and other newer aircraft usually have two axis autopilots with altitude hold. When other pilots say " a second pilot is needed", they may be referring to single pilot IFR without an autopilot, or out there in the sticks without radar coverage making leg calculations, mandatory reports over fixes with estimates for the next, all on the old whiz wheel. I fly single pilot IFR in a C310 sans autopilot, and I welcome the company when I can get it.:-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
Tony writes:
You might try getting into a real cockpit, much of what you've read here will become obvious then. I think it will become clearer with experience, be it in a real cockpit or in a simulator. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
Andrew Sarangan writes:
Since you are comparing IFR to VFR, I am assuming that conditions are VMC. Not necessarily, although I see your point. I was thinking mainly in terms of the cockpit workload for IFR vs. VFR. I actually find IFR easier than VFR in a simulator, but there are some key differences between simulation and reality that might keep this from being fully representative. It's hard to "turn" one's head in a sim, since the view is mostly out the front of the aircraft, and the landmarks on the ground below may be less (or sometimes more) clear than in real life. Whatever the case may be, I find that looking at instruments seems to require less work than looking out the window, worrying about other traffic, and so on. A flight in IMC (without any icing or really rough weather), where the only traffic is IFR, makes me worry somewhat less about hitting someone. Also note that VMC does not necessarily mean VFR. The vast majority of IFR flights take place in VMC. Once the autopilot or FMC is set up, it seems like it would be mostly relaxing and sightseeing out the window. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is an IFR flight more or less work?
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... I think someone here said that you really need a copilot when you fly IFR. If so, what duties does the copilot have? There are many things a second pilot can do to help, starting with: 1) monitoring and transcribing ATC calls and clearances 2) verifying radio frequencies 3) timing approaches as a means of secondary navigation 4) assisting with checklists; particularly in complex or performance aircraft. 5) providing a second pair of eyes on the panel and outside the airplane. I actually find IFR easier than VFR in a simulator, It is; your attention is generally only focused on the lower half of your monitor; you don't need to look over the nose, etc as long as you can keep the needle centered and stay oriented. -c |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
FLIGHT SIMULATOR X DELUXE 2006-2007 (SIMULATION) 1DVD,Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004, and Addons, FLITESTAR V8.51 - JEPPESEN, MapInfo StreetPro U.S.A. [11 CDs], Rand McNally StreetFinder & TripMaker Deluxe 2004 [3 CDs], other | T.E.L. | Simulators | 0 | October 14th 06 09:08 PM |
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 11:05 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |