If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
FES vs Gas Engine – Finding a Thermal?
On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 11:46:05 AM UTC-5, Tony wrote:
My experience in the Electro mirrors Scott's, although he seems to be better at centering the low thermals than I! I'm usually closer to 30% battery used for a self launch. My experience is similar to Tony's. I usually climb to 1000 at about 70% power then dial back to sustainer level 4 KW searching for the 1st thermal then center the thermal until I climb to 2000 then shut down. A good day I will have 70% battery left. On a bad day 50% There is no plummet mode with the FES |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
_FES_vs_Gas_Engine_–_Finding_a_Thermal?
Not sure an electric "engine on a stick" is sensible as a new
design for a get you home (turbo) glider - all the drag and complexity of the erection mechanism/doors etc. Surely the FES route make much more sense - simpler, less drag, more efficient. Of course if you already own a Rotax/Solo shaker stick engine it might be attractive (outside of EASA land) you lucky Americans. When the engine on a stick fails the drag is very dependant on the individual sailplane: it's not just the engine & pylon there's often a big radiator too. From recollection the DG400(&PIK20E) was about 14:1; the DG800B/C a bit better, a previous post gives 20:1 for the ASH26E; the Antares 20E (no radiator) is 30:1. Dave Walsh |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
_FES_vs_Gas_Engine_–_Finding_a_Thermal?
As a facilities, RC electric and automotive guy, beyond depleted batteries or really crappy wiring, the "no run" on electric is likely magnitudes better than any gas.
Regardless of FES or pylon. The electric motor is a ton less, but current battery tech (no pun intended) makes the gas/electric swap (for similar power) a wash. The batteries take a lot of weight, but it's closer to fuselage centerline so the CG effect is limited. Cost, well, how is it certified and how open is your aviation authority? Engineering, like marriage, there is give and take, nothing is perfect. Make the best decision you can, live with any potential downside. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
_FES_vs_Gas_Engine_–_Finding_a_Thermal?
I don't think that there will be much drag from the erected but not turning pylon and prop of the GP 14/15 design. The blades are folded backwards and the pylon looks pretty aerodynamic. I think it is a brilliant concept - with the added benefit of being a self launcher rather than a sustainer. If the GP 15 was more advanced through the certification and a more known design I would be waiting for one now instead of for a Solo engines self launcher.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
_FES_vs_Gas_Engine_–_Finding_a_Thermal?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need help finding someone. | Tim Murphy | Soaring | 0 | March 12th 12 04:15 PM |
Thermal Forcasting -Thermal index | gldrgidr | Soaring | 6 | November 27th 10 10:26 PM |
Thermal Data Files Thermal Mapping Project Australia | Mal | Soaring | 0 | December 2nd 05 11:14 PM |
Finding a partnership | Greg | Owning | 11 | November 10th 03 08:40 PM |
Help finding photo | Chris W | Piloting | 11 | July 29th 03 04:07 PM |