If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Buzzer wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 07:06:15 GMT, Guy Alcala wrote: Are you registered here? http://www.jedonline.com/default.asp Quick Search apr-25 At the bottom of results EW 101 1/1999 Apparently I haven't been there in quite awhile, as they wouldn't accept my login and I had to register again. Thanks for the cite. Guy |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Buzzer wrote:
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 06:05:51 GMT, Guy Alcala wrote: snip H'mm that seems a bit off. Normally, fire control sets search at a lower PRF, then track at a higher one. FWIW, the first available site I could find credits Fan Song C/E with the following PRFs: PRF 828-1440 Search. 1656-2880 Trk. Makes me wonder now. Did they "flip a switch" and double the prf? Or did the prf double because the aircraft was in the box and two beams at the same prf were hitting? snip I imagine PRF changed automatically as soon as they started auto-tracking. Otherwise, they could do so manually when jamming required manual track. The Fansong actually had three guys to do manual tracking, one each for range, altitude and azimuth. Guy |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Juvat wrote in message . ..
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, Ivan blurted out: :-) You're welcome! Many thanks! I also have a copy of the Project CHECO report "COMBAT SNAP: AIM-9J Southeast Asia Introduction," but Guy addressed the issue for you. Would you mind posting some other details from these both reports? No problem...anything you're looking for, specifically? The Rivet Haste report is only 22 pages. The COMBAT SNAP report is about 30 or so pages long. Hmm, ideally all those 52 pages will be fine. ;-) But more seriously, I dont know what is in this reports included, generaly I am looking for some technical descriptions and info about operational use. Cheers Ivan |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
On 12 Aug 2003 15:21:56 -0700, (Zajcevi) wrote:
5. TV - used only on F-4Es with TISEO 1967 Walleye on F-4Ds out of Ubon, Thailand. The debriefings I caught they blew a barge out of the water next to a dock, and flew a bomb into a cave. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-62.htm "Air Force began Walleye combat tests in Vietnam during August 1967 that achieved excellent results in good visibility against targets that gave a strong contrast and were lightly defended." |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Zajcevi wrote:
Hello Many thanks for all answers here, I needed some time to sort everything what was writen here and I got some additional questions. Guy Alcala wrote in message ... APQ-72 (F-4B) and APQ-100 were almost identical for A-A use, the main difference being that the Air Force required the latter to have an adjustable range strobe for bombing (not a very useful feature, actually, given the way it was implemented). IFF interrogators were later added to the APQ-100 and 109 at least, APX-76 IIRR. So the first APQ-72s and APQ-100s/109s were without any IFF systems? Without IFF interrogators. They always had transponders. When they have been added? Don't remember offhand, but will try and check. Was APX-76 used on F-4Js/Es, and also Combat Tree birds? No idea. The diagrams of F-4E cockpits I've got show the IFF interrogator panel (in the RCP, left of the radar scope) as a blank panel, but photos show that it is indeed for that purpose. Unfortunately, the label can't be seen. Photos of the back cockpit of F-4Gs show a panel labeled APX-80 in the same spot. Walt Bjorneby, who'll hopefully chime in, has stated in the past that the APQ-109 was longer-ranged than the APQ-120, owing to the larger antenna. Basic A-A options were a normal B-scan search and lock-on mode, Boresight, or Gyro Out, Have I understand it correctly? A-A 1. B-scan - basic mode used for search Yes. 2. Lock-on - once was target acquired in B-scan, it was tracked in Lock-on and it also provided illuminating for AIM-7s Yes, with both manual or auto-tracking available, in both range and/or azimuth/elevation. 3. Boresight - used during dogfights, generally radar looked at the same point like pipper. Always aligned with the pipper, until lock-on achieved, then it would auto-track the target. In another topis about F-4E some time ago Dweezil Dwarftosser wrote about some Auto Acq mode and his generations. Was Auto Acq submode of Boresight or it is only another designation the same mode? Auto-acq allowed an automatic acquisition and lock-on while in boresight or later, in CAA mode. Essentially, it eliminated the need to manually position the range gate around the target. 4. Gyro out - another one used in dogfights Yes. 5. TV - used only on F-4Es with TISEO F-4Ds equipped for A/G PGM use had a separate TV, the Sony scope. Got to go, I'll finish my reply later. Guy Were there any other modes or submodes, or some differences dependable on F-4 version? A-G From another topis about F-4E byDweezil Dwarftosser: MAP-B - ? MAP-PPI - for offset bombing A/G - ranging for boms, rockets, guns Were there any others? How was called mode when adjustable range bombing strobe on F-4C was used? The some for additional modes for F-4D? APG-59 was a high PRF Pulse Doppler (alternatively pulse) set, with a considerably higher average power in PD mode than the earlier sets. Good for head-on detection of look down targets, at least over water, and apparently considerably longer ranged on closing targets than the pure pulse sets, at least when ground clutter wasn't a problem. Friedman's "U.S. Naval Weapons" states that it was credited with detecting a 5 sq. m. target at 60nm, which should be considerably better than the other radars were capable of. APG-59, APQ-120 were both low/ high PRF, APQ-72/100/109 were only low PRF? Have APG-59 some different operational modes like USAF types? Regards Ivan |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Guy Alcala wrote:
Zajcevi wrote: snip previous post details Got to go, I'll finish my reply later. Guy And finishing the rest: Were there any other modes or submodes, or some differences dependable on F-4 version? A-G From another topis about F-4E byDweezil Dwarftosser: MAP-B - ? MAP-PPI - for offset bombing A/G - ranging for boms, rockets, guns Already answered by others. Were there any others? How was called mode when adjustable range bombing strobe on F-4C was used? That seems to be part of various nuclear bomb deliveries, rather than having a specific "mode" to itself. The bombing range strobe appears when "MAP-PPI" mode is selected. Here's what the F-4C-34-1-1 says: "Bombing Range Strobe. In PPI mode, the bombing range strobe is a series of straight lines which take the form of a true arc of a circle. This strobe is ground adjustable to be displayed at a point between 0 to 50 miles. The bombing range strobe is used as a range reference when bombing blind ground targets in conjunction with the sequential timer of the ARBCS [Guy note: Attitude Reference and Bombing Computer Set]." and elsewhe "The bombing range strobe is present with the MAP-PPI display. The strobe must be precisely adjusted (using ground test equipment) so that the outer edge of the strobe represents a predetermined range at a given altitude AGL." Since this is really just for nuke deliveries, info on using it doesn't appear in the -34-1-1, but in the confidential or secret supplements (-34-1-1-1 or -34-1-1-2). Ed has described how the strobe was used. The some for additional modes for F-4D? Can't help there, except to say that the F-4D's WRCS could accept range and probably slant angle and even velocity inputs from a ground radar lock, in Dive Toss mode. The F-4C was pretty much manual, loft or LADD. APG-59 was a high PRF Pulse Doppler (alternatively pulse) set, with a considerably higher average power in PD mode than the earlier sets. Good for head-on detection of look down targets, at least over water, and apparently considerably longer ranged on closing targets than the pure pulse sets, at least when ground clutter wasn't a problem. Friedman's "U.S. Naval Weapons" states that it was credited with detecting a 5 sq. m. target at 60nm, which should be considerably better than the other radars were capable of. APG-59, APQ-120 were both low/ high PRF, APQ-72/100/109 were only low PRF? No, the pulse radars (including APQ-120) were all low PRF. AFAIK ALL pulse radars are low PRF. Here's a (reasonably) concise definition of the three PRF classes, from Stimson's "Introduction to Airborne Radar": "Because of the tremendous impact the choice of PRF has on performance, it has become customary to classify airborne radars in terms of the PRFs they employ. Recognizing that the regions of unambiguous range and and unambiguous doppler frequency are very nearly mutually exclusive, three basic categories of PRF have been established: low, medium, and high." "These are defined in terms not of the numerical value of the PRF per se, but of whether the PRF is such that the observed ranges and/or doppler frequencies are ambiguous. While exact definitions vary, all are similar. The following is a widely used, consistent set of definitions:" "A low PRF is one for which the maximum range the radar is designed to handle lies in the first range zone. In the absence of return from beyond this zone, _range_ is _un_ambiguous." "A high PRF is one for which the observed doppler _frequencies_ of all significant targets are _un_ambiguous." "A medium PRF is one for which neither of these conditions is satisfied. Both _range_ and _dopppler_ are _ambiguous_." "Which category a particular PRF falls in depends to a considerable extent on the operating conditions. A PRF of 4 kilohertz -- first range zone extending to 20 nautical miles -- would be 'low' if the maximum target range were _less_ than 20 nm. Yet the same PRF, 4 KHz, would be 'medium' if the maximum range were greater than 20nm and the spread between maximum positive and negative doppler frequencies exceeded 4 KHz." "Similarly, a PRF of 20 KHz might be 'medium' for a 3-centimeter radar (X-band), yet 'high' for a 10-centimeter radar (S-band) if, say, the radar's velocity were 200 knots and the velocity of the fastest target, 1,000 knots -- maximum closing rate 1,200 knots." "In practice, not all of the possible PRFs within each category are used for any one radar band. at X-band, for example, PRFs in the low category typically run from 250 to 4000 hertz; PRFs in the medium category are on the order of 10 to 20 kilohertz; PRFs in the high category may range anywhere from 100 to 300 kilohertz." To put this in perspective, the APQ-100 PRFs vary from 330 to 1,060 Hertz, depending on the mode and range selected. APG-59 was probably operating up around 200 kilohertz in Pulse Doppler mode. Have APG-59 some different operational modes like USAF types? I'm sure it does but I don't know what they are, other than a high PRF Pulse Doppler mode that the USAF types lack. Guy |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Guy Alcala wrote:
Zajcevi wrote: How was called mode when adjustable range bombing strobe on F-4C was used? That seems to be part of various nuclear bomb deliveries, rather than having a specific "mode" to itself. The bombing range strobe appears when "MAP-PPI" mode is selected. Here's what the F-4C-34-1-1 says: "Bombing Range Strobe. In PPI mode, the bombing range strobe is a series of straight lines which take the form of a true arc of a circle. This strobe is ground adjustable to be displayed at a point between 0 to 50 miles. The bombing range strobe is used as a range reference when bombing blind ground targets in conjunction with the sequential timer of the ARBCS [Guy note: Attitude Reference and Bombing Computer Set]." and elsewhe "The bombing range strobe is present with the MAP-PPI display. The strobe must be precisely adjusted (using ground test equipment) so that the outer edge of the strobe represents a predetermined range at a given altitude AGL." Since this is really just for nuke deliveries, info on using it doesn't appear in the -34-1-1, but in the confidential or secret supplements (-34-1-1-1 or -34-1-1-2). Ed has described how the strobe was used. The nuke delivery in the F-4C was done with a two stage timer. You would calculate the distance to the target at a pre-determined ground speed from a known IP (initial point). This could be a visual landmark, or a set distance from a ground radar return. If choosing a VLD/RLD (Visual or Radar Laydown Delivery), you started the timer by depressing the pickle button at the IP (when the radar bomb strobe touches the target or IP radar blip) then flew straight ahead at fixed speed. When the timer expires the blivet is released. Or if lofting the bomb in a VLADD/RLADD (Visual or Radar Low-Angle Drogue Delivery), two timer settings were used. Same IP definition, either visual landmark or intersection of the bomb strobe and blip. Pickle and hold, maintain airspeed until first timer setting elapses then start four-G pull up straight ahead for second timer run (usually about six or seven seconds). Bomb releases in climb at about 30-45 degrees of pitch and flies forward to the target in a ballistic arc. A "drogue" chute deploys based on a bomb timer to stabilize the bomb and slow descent until a radar ranging mechanism detonates the bomb at a preset height above the ground (air burst rather than the ground burst of the laydown delivery). The delivery aircraft completes a wing-over and escapes about 90-135 degrees off the original run-in course. The strobe was screw-driver adjustable and was manually tweaked by the WSO against the BIT (built-in test) range marks generated during radar pre-flight checks. Usually five or four mile range was used in range work. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (ret) ***"When Thunder Rolled: *** An F-105 Pilot Over N. Vietnam" *** from Smithsonian Books ISBN: 1588341038 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: Vietnam The Helicopter War Large HC Book 189p | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 6th 04 05:19 PM |
Dogfights in Vietnam | Mike | Military Aviation | 11 | July 30th 03 09:47 PM |
Australia tries to rewrite history of Vietnam War | Evan Brennan | Military Aviation | 34 | July 18th 03 11:45 PM |
Trying to make sense of Vietnam air war | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 6th 03 11:13 PM |
Vietnam search to continue to find remains of Waterford pilot | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 03 10:30 PM |