![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... In article , Juan Jimenez says... Monkey see, monkey do. I guess it's true that retards feed from each other. Guess your right Hmmm let's see jim zoom campbell and jaun jaminiz (spelled wrong on purpose) :-) Gee, what can I say, only a putz like you would consider it a privilege to brag about his unilingual ignorance, to the point that you think it necessary to point out that you can't spell, in English _or_ Spanish. Chuck (I designed my own plane ,did you?) S RAH-15/1 ret Juan (I pay my son for his work, don't have any drug addicts in my family and no one in my family has ever had his children taken away by the state....) :-) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sean Trost wrote:
I stand corrected. Thanks Jim. Learned somthing new everyday. Sean Jim Carriere wrote: Sean Trost wrote: Juan I believe that N1 is related to the velocity of the airstream introduced. Which is good. But not related to the ignition problem Now You have said that you have an excellent spark and good fuel. the only other thing you need for start is the right airflow. or volumn. Dont know about your engine specifically but most everything else runs right around 14 to 1 on the ratio wise. Actually, jets are a different beast from piston engines. Between about 25:1 and 50:1 is normal, even for lightoff fuel flow. Stoichiometrically correct combustion is too hot. 50:1 would be the total airflow:fuel ratio through the engine core. Of those 50 parts air, 15 are primary air that mixes with the fuel for stoichiometrically correct combustion. The other 35 parts are secondary air (not to be confused with a turbofan's bypass air, which doesn't pass through the core). Some secondary air passes around the exterior of the combustion chamber liner to cool it, and some passes through holes into the chamber to shape the flame and hold it away from the liner wall to prevent damage. None of this is impingement starting air, which hits the turbine blades and then goes right out the exhaust duct. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colibri wrote:
Sean Trost wrote: I stand corrected. Thanks Jim. Learned somthing new everyday. Sean Jim Carriere wrote: Sean Trost wrote: Juan I believe that N1 is related to the velocity of the airstream introduced. Which is good. But not related to the ignition problem Now You have said that you have an excellent spark and good fuel. the only other thing you need for start is the right airflow. or volumn. Dont know about your engine specifically but most everything else runs right around 14 to 1 on the ratio wise. Actually, jets are a different beast from piston engines. Between about 25:1 and 50:1 is normal, even for lightoff fuel flow. Stoichiometrically correct combustion is too hot. 50:1 would be the total airflow:fuel ratio through the engine core. Of those 50 parts air, 15 are primary air that mixes with the fuel for stoichiometrically correct combustion. The other 35 parts are secondary air (not to be confused with a turbofan's bypass air, which doesn't pass through the core). Some secondary air passes around the exterior of the combustion chamber liner to cool it, and some passes through holes into the chamber to shape the flame and hold it away from the liner wall to prevent damage. This is a better explanation than I gave, but I'll elaborate further to this that while technically only 15 of those parts of air are "burned" (use to support combustion), and the secondary air begins mixing with the flame very close to where the fuel nozzle(s) are located. Depending on the design of the engine, some or even all the secondary air flowing around the combustor liner mixes with the primary air/flame before entering the turbine. Complex engines will route some of the secondary air through tiny cooling passages in the turbine blades themselves (I'm pretty sure you, Colibri, understand this, I'm speaking to the group and not trying to insult you), but I strongly doubt this is the case with Juan's engine. None of this is impingement starting air, which hits the turbine blades and then goes right out the exhaust duct. This is an important distinction, so is the difference between secondary and bypass. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B2431" wrote in message ... And you have never proved Chuck has either so please don't bring it up again. Who cares who proves what Chuck "has either"? I certainly don't. Get over it, dannyboy. ![]() |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Carriere" wrote in message ... This is a better explanation than I gave, but I'll elaborate further to this that while technically only 15 of those parts of air are "burned" (use to support combustion), and the secondary air begins mixing with the flame very close to where the fuel nozzle(s) are located. Depending on the design of the engine, some or even all the secondary air flowing around the combustor liner mixes with the primary air/flame before entering the turbine. Complex engines will route some of the secondary air through tiny cooling passages in the turbine blades themselves (I'm pretty sure you, Colibri, understand this, I'm speaking to the group and not trying to insult you), but I strongly doubt this is the case with Juan's engine. You are correct. My engine is not a turbofan, it is a turbojet, circa 1973. None of this is impingement starting air, which hits the turbine blades and then goes right out the exhaust duct. This is an important distinction, so is the difference between secondary and bypass. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RobertR237" wrote in message ... You waste your effort Dan, just ploink the lying fool and life will seem much better. Nobody here believes anything he says anyway. Sure, kiddo, you keep believing that and watching Disney movies, maybe it will all come true for you some day. ![]() |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was YOU in the truck???!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
"Richard Riley" wrote in message ... On 15 Jan 2005 09:18:40 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote: :Guess your right Hmmm let's see jim zoom campbell and jaun jaminiz (spelled :wrong on purpose) :-) Chuck, I'm told Juan doesn't trust Zoom to test fly his airplane, so Juan's getting in some practice time before he takes it up for first flight. http://tinyurl.com/4fkgz |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"B2431" wrote in message ... And you have never proved Chuck has either so please don't bring it up again. Who cares who proves what Chuck "has either"? I certainly don't. Get over it, dannyboy. ![]() Probably the same number of people who care about seeing your childish attacks on Chuck. I'm guessing zero. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
turbine in microturbine generator for aircraft? | Shin Gou | Home Built | 19 | December 26th 04 02:19 PM |
Alternate turbine fuel | Robert Bates | Home Built | 24 | June 7th 04 07:16 AM |
turbine propeller | sebastian | Home Built | 19 | March 21st 04 12:47 AM |
Pulsar with a turbine? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 33 | August 28th 03 04:02 PM |
The Sun is hot but the beer is cold in Iowa! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 13 | July 29th 03 01:14 AM |