Strange But (Un)True?

In article , Tom
wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:50:51 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article
,
150flivver wrote:

On Oct 3, 12:13*pm, Tom wrote:

The reactive force of the hugely powerful downwash sheet, coupled with
the compressibility effects of the tip vortices, simply will not allow
the aircraft to get any lower to the ground than approximately one half
the distance of its wingspan ‹ until speed is drastically reduced,
which, of course, is what happens during normal landings.

Flight 77 "hit the Pentagon" at cruising speed.

So speaketh an aeronautical engineer.

Looks like another alumnus of Coldine University.

N0 -- Boxtop University. I wonder how many "Captain Crunch" boxtops he
had to send in for his fake "degree."

Gee, I dunno. Maybe I give a **** about being accurate. And maybe I
don't much care about know-nothing blowhards who throw bad advice and
accusations around because they're too emotionally stunted to admit
they're just too damned stupid to know what the **** they're talking
about.

Ever stop to think for a second that sometimes when it seems like
everyone is on your ass there's a reason for it? And that reason is you?

In that case, you need to check your six, fool!

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:09:35 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

get
your claimed "aeronautical engineering degree?"

Lie.

Never claimed I was.

You're full of more **** than a retard's diaper.

On 6/10/2011 5:50 a.m., Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article
,
wrote:

On Oct 3, 12:13 pm, wrote:

The reactive force of the hugely powerful downwash sheet, coupled with
the compressibility effects of the tip vortices, simply will not allow
the aircraft to get any lower to the ground than approximately one half
the distance of its wingspan ‹ until speed is drastically reduced,
which, of course, is what happens during normal landings.

Flight 77 "hit the Pentagon" at cruising speed.

So speaketh an aeronautical engineer.

Looks like another alumnus of Coldine University.

N0 -- Boxtop University. I wonder how many "Captain Crunch" boxtops he
had to send in for his fake "degree."

C'mon Orval. he got his degree from a thermometer

On Oct 5, 2:15*pm, george152 wrote:
On 6/10/2011 5:50 a.m., Orval Fairbairn wrote:









In article
,
* *wrote:

On Oct 3, 12:13 pm, *wrote:

The reactive force of the hugely powerful downwash sheet, coupled with
the compressibility effects of the tip vortices, simply will not allow
the aircraft to get any lower to the ground than approximately one half
the distance of its wingspan until speed is drastically reduced,
which, of course, is what happens during normal landings.

Flight 77 "hit the Pentagon" at cruising speed.

So speaketh an aeronautical engineer.

Looks like another alumnus of Coldine University.

N0 -- Boxtop University. I wonder how many "Captain Crunch" boxtops he
had to send in for his fake "degree."

C'mon Orval. he got his degree from a thermometer

Coldine U is the bogus school the Bogus Dr. Quin teaches bogus
students like Tom bogus conspiracy theory. Might as well add bogus
aeronautical engineering to his credentials as well as bogus piloting
experience.

On Oct 4, 12:04*pm, Tom wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:47:56 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:
I

Sorry, you've been dismissed as a fraud.

No, that's you dismissed as a fraud, fjucktard.

Now go back to playing dolls.

On Oct 3, 1:26*pm, Tom wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:40:19 +0000 (UTC), Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article , Tom wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:38:35 -0400, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

And yet, Orval Fairbairn asks us to believe that Hanjour pulled off a
stunt that would press the limits of even the most experienced aviation
test pilot.

Given a few days practice in Microsoft Flight Simulator, *anybody*
could do it.

Brother, you got some catching it up to do.

Not only is it implausible, it's impossible.

Start hehttp://video.google.com/videoplay?do......58033&hl=en

And end he

http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o(if vimeo gives you problems)

Supplemental FAQ:

http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/...plane_hit.html

You have to imagine them coming out of that turn, flying tree top level,
being able to see or know where the Pentagon is miles away at the
bottom of a ridge, treeline, highways, and a high-rise skyline- and
then be able to miss the VDOT tower or fly above it, then drop down
threading itself through 5 light poles, while missing the VDOT camera
mast next to pole 1 and then fly low and level just a few feet above
the lawn, skimming on it's belly into the first floor. That on it's
face is implausible, the above evidence based presentations show it is
IMPOSSIBLE.

Hani wasn't piloting that plane. eom

Ah yes! Those reputable "sources" from teh intrawebs! Of course!
That's the very fount from which all knowledge springs! IS THAT ALL
YOU GOT SONNY??

****ing retards. Give your computer back to your mom, go take your
meds and play in the freeway, loon-boi.

On Oct 4, 2:17*pm, Tom wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 08:00:27 +1300, george152 wrote:
*that's going to be ignored by the nonpilot

So you think there was no pilot? Remote controlled aircraft? Or extra
special good luck leprechaunauts? lol

No, oh clueless ******, he's referring to YOU, the loon, the nutjob,
wingnut, asshat, fjucktard, in short YOU are the nonpilot.

On Oct 4, 10:50*pm, Tom wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC), Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article , Tom wrote:

Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent he could not
fly a Cessna in August...

I looked him up. *He had a commercial pilot's license. *They don't issue
those to people who are "so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna"

In other words, you lied.

You idiot, Quaalude never claimed any such thing.

Go back and re-read the first sentence of the first post of this
thread, which I quote above.

Right it says he was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August.
Point?

It's on the top of your empty head, loon-boi.

On 7/10/2011 1:42 a.m., Richard wrote:
On Oct 4, 2:17 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 08:00:27 +1300, george152 wrote:
that's going to be ignored by the nonpilot

So you think there was no pilot? Remote controlled aircraft? Or extra
special good luck leprechaunauts? lol

No, oh clueless ******, he's referring to YOU, the loon, the nutjob,
wingnut, asshat, fjucktard, in short YOU are the nonpilot.


Oh he knew what I meant alright. It's just he hasn't got the honesty to
admit it...

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:53:54 +1300, george152 wrote:

On 7/10/2011 1:42 a.m., Richard wrote:
On Oct 4, 2:17 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 08:00:27 +1300, george152 wrote:
that's going to be ignored by the nonpilot

So you think there was no pilot? Remote controlled aircraft? Or extra
special good luck leprechaunauts? lol

No, oh clueless ******, he's referring to YOU, the loon, the nutjob,
wingnut, asshat, fjucktard, in short YOU are the nonpilot.


Oh he knew what I meant alright. It's just he hasn't got the honesty to
admit it...

Let's try this again, shall we?

So you think there was no pilot? Remote controlled aircraft? Or extra
special good luck leprechaunauts?

Any chance you have any intention of debating instead of trolling like a
5th grader?