A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Leaving all engines running at the gate



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 3rd 04, 06:40 PM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Leaving all engines running at the gate

Recently at SJU I saw an IB A340-600 arrive from Madrid that left all
four engines running during the 2 hours that it was at the gate before
continuing to Santo Domingo. After all the passengers got off the
entire crew, both cabin AND cockpit crew got off and went to the
transit lounge for about an hour before returning to board for the SDQ
leg. All this time the engines were left running. In fact, they
never stopped running the whole time they were at SJU. I have never
seen an airliner do this before and was wondering if something was
wrong with this particular aircraft or if this is some kind of new
"windmilling" feature on the new A346 or something. Perhaps related,
I've heard that IB have had a horrible experience with their new A346s
and this particular aircraft, EC-INO (Gaudi), the first one they
received, is said to have given then more headaches than all the
others.

What circumcstances would make an airline leave a plane guzzling gas
for such a long time on the ground?
  #2  
Old February 3rd 04, 07:53 PM
Larry Fransson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2004-02-03 10:40:37 -0800, John said:

What circumcstances would make an airline leave a plane guzzling gas
for such a long time on the ground?


Just about none. You couldn't have any ground crew anywhere near the
aircraft doing the usual ground crew stuff (loading/unloading baggage, etc)
with engines running. And nobody in their right mind would leave engines
running without somebody on the flight deck to mind the aircraft.

It seems more likely to me that it might have been very windy at the time
and that the windmilling of the engines along with the noise from the APU
might have given the appearance of having engines running.

--
Larry Fransson
Seattle, WA
  #3  
Old February 3rd 04, 08:33 PM
snowy squirrel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John wrote:

Recently at SJU I saw an IB A340-600 arrive from Madrid that left all
four engines running during the 2 hours that it was at the gate before
continuing to Santo Domingo.


If you could see the engines turning, it means that they were shut off and
just slowly turning due to wind.

It would be very hard for maintenance personel to get near the aircraft with
all 4 engines running. And I suspect extremely hazardous (if not illegal) to
refuel while engines are running.

It is far more likely that what you saw were just engines turning slowly due
to wind.

There are situations where engines on one side are left running in extreme
cold arctic conditions, and all passenger, cargo, fuel is handled from the
other side. This is to ensure that at least one engine is available to
generate sufficient power to restart the second engine.
  #4  
Old February 4th 04, 12:10 AM
Jim Davis Sr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"snowy squirrel" wrote in message
...
John wrote:
It is far more likely that what you saw were just engines turning slowly

due
to wind.

Reminds me of what Steven Wright once said. "I used to own a helicopter,
but had no place to park it, so I tied a rope to it, & left it running."


  #5  
Old February 4th 04, 01:28 AM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

snowy squirrel wrote:

John wrote:

Recently at SJU I saw an IB A340-600 arrive from Madrid that left all
four engines running during the 2 hours that it was at the gate before
continuing to Santo Domingo.


If you could see the engines turning, it means that they were shut off and
just slowly turning due to wind.

It would be very hard for maintenance personel to get near the aircraft with
all 4 engines running. And I suspect extremely hazardous (if not illegal) to
refuel while engines are running.

It is far more likely that what you saw were just engines turning slowly due
to wind.

There are situations where engines on one side are left running in extreme
cold arctic conditions, and all passenger, cargo, fuel is handled from the
other side. This is to ensure that at least one engine is available to
generate sufficient power to restart the second engine.


Nope, those four fans were running at a pretty good clip. No wind
involved there. Besides, with the size of those things, it would take
a hurricane to keep them turning for two hours.
  #6  
Old February 4th 04, 02:29 AM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The fans you saw were probably being turned by the wind. The noise you
heard was probably the APU running in the back. Its not unusual for a
plane to sit at the gate with the APU running in the tail of the
plane. Its a jet too and sounds like one.

John wrote in message . ..
Recently at SJU I saw an IB A340-600 arrive from Madrid that left all
four engines running during the 2 hours that it was at the gate before
continuing to Santo Domingo. After all the passengers got off the
entire crew, both cabin AND cockpit crew got off and went to the
transit lounge for about an hour before returning to board for the SDQ
leg. All this time the engines were left running. In fact, they
never stopped running the whole time they were at SJU. I have never
seen an airliner do this before and was wondering if something was
wrong with this particular aircraft or if this is some kind of new
"windmilling" feature on the new A346 or something. Perhaps related,
I've heard that IB have had a horrible experience with their new A346s
and this particular aircraft, EC-INO (Gaudi), the first one they
received, is said to have given then more headaches than all the
others.

What circumcstances would make an airline leave a plane guzzling gas
for such a long time on the ground?

  #7  
Old February 4th 04, 02:55 AM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John" wrote in message


Besides, with the size of those things, it would take
a hurricane to keep them turning for two hours.


Have you ever turned a turbine engine?

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


  #8  
Old February 4th 04, 03:26 AM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John" wrote in message

Nope, those four fans were running at a pretty good clip. No wind
involved there. Besides, with the size of those things, it would take
a hurricane to keep them turning for two hours.


Rotor sections are *extremely* finely balanced, else they would vibrate the
engine right off the wing at operational speeds. What this means is that
the blade wheels will turn freely with very little force applied. A light
breeze will suffice, no hurricane required. In my experience, more often
than not you'll see these things turning (at least with large fan engines)
if there's any breeze exposure at all.


Regards,

John Gaquin
B727, B747


  #9  
Old February 4th 04, 03:57 AM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John wrote:



Nope, those four fans were running at a pretty good clip. No wind
involved there. Besides, with the size of those things, it would take
a hurricane to keep them turning for two hours.


It takes very little wind to turn the blades.

  #10  
Old February 4th 04, 04:33 AM
karl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you could see the blades turning then the engines coudn't be running.

Karl




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NS Norfolk Gate 2 NATOPS - All Hands Memorize Immediately! Yofuri Naval Aviation 0 December 17th 04 05:38 AM
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch Paul Home Built 0 October 18th 04 10:14 PM
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! Scet Military Aviation 6 September 27th 04 01:09 AM
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM
What if the germans... Charles Gray Military Aviation 119 January 26th 04 11:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.