A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

173 ATC Towers to Close



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 5th 13, 10:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Carlyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 324
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

The sequester is hitting ATC towers. Here's the story from CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/05/travel...ex.html?hpt=h\
p_t2

Here's a list of the 173 towers to be closed:
http://www.faa.gov/news/updates/medi..._Be_Closed.pdf

-John, Q3
  #2  
Old March 5th 13, 11:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,691
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

Wow, that affects some extremely busy towered airports in the Minneapolis
area. I don't know if those airports can operate safely without a control
tower.

Paul Remde

"John Carlyle" wrote in message
...

The sequester is hitting ATC towers. Here's the story from CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/05/travel...ex.html?hpt=h\
p_t2

Here's a list of the 173 towers to be closed:
http://www.faa.gov/news/updates/medi..._Be_Closed.pdf

-John, Q3

  #3  
Old March 5th 13, 11:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 97
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

Isn't that the point?

..Gov once again employing emotional extortion to get what they want?

By cutting or threatening cuts that are overwhelmingly "bottom-up", and exact maximumal suffering and exposure upon the general public, "we" are far more likely to cave in to .Gov's insatiable desire for more $$ and/or control.

Throw in a few "public safety" and "for the children" clauses and you have covered 90% of modern political rhetoric.
  #4  
Old March 5th 13, 11:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
son_of_flubber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,550
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 6:03:24 PM UTC-5, Paul Remde wrote:
I don't know if those airports can operate safely without a control
tower.


There will be 'h--- to pay' if there is an accident related to the closures.
  #5  
Old March 5th 13, 11:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:19:35 PM UTC-7, wrote:
Isn't that the point?



.Gov once again employing emotional extortion to get what they want?



By cutting or threatening cuts that are overwhelmingly "bottom-up", and exact maximumal suffering and exposure upon the general public, "we" are far more likely to cave in to .Gov's insatiable desire for more $$ and/or control.



Throw in a few "public safety" and "for the children" clauses and you have covered 90% of modern political rhetoric.


More likely to turn the screws on the 1%. Many private jet insurance policies limit operations to tower controlled fields.
  #6  
Old March 5th 13, 11:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

The Lone Star Executive in Conroe, not Houston as the FAA list shows, has no commercial flights, maybe a few charters now and then. I don't see why they ever needed a tower.

ASW27BV
  #7  
Old March 6th 13, 12:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

This is the first I've ever heard of that.

Most of the airports in Kansas on the list...I have no idea why they have towers, except that most of them get 1 regional flight a day or something.
  #8  
Old March 6th 13, 01:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dale Watkins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

No active control tower - airspace would change - I have more areas to fly to.

That would be interesting .

Zen
  #9  
Old March 6th 13, 02:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike the Strike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 952
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close

Great - more unencumbered airspace for sailplanes!

Mike
  #10  
Old March 6th 13, 02:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Steve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default 173 ATC Towers to Close


Back in my teaching days, many years ago, one of the things I liked to
ask the class to consider was this: Imagine a government agency with
only two tasks: (1) building statues of Benedict Arnold and (2)
providing life-saving medications to children. If this agency's budget
were cut, what would it do?
The answer, of course, is that it would cut back on the medications
for children. Why? Because that would be what was most likely to get
the budget cuts restored. If they cut back on building statues of
Benedict Arnold, people might ask why they were building statues of
Benedict Arnold in the first place.

The example was deliberately extreme as an illustration. But, in the
real world, the same general pattern can be seen in local, state and
national government responses to budget cuts.

The above is from a recent column by Thomas Sowell.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enough, Original Towers glider[_2_] Soaring 0 March 7th 10 02:18 PM
Multiple control towers? NVArt Piloting 13 March 17th 07 11:57 PM
Non-federal towers Kyle Boatright Piloting 30 January 14th 05 01:51 AM
I hate cell towers Jay Honeck Piloting 52 June 18th 04 03:08 AM
Portable towers in FS2K4? Blue Simulators 1 February 23rd 04 11:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.