If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Could Canada Build
Could Canada build a complete modern jet fighter with missiles and
radar? Assume they have lots of money (10-20 billion dollars) and seven or so years. Canada is actually well positioned to build the airframe. Bombardier has very significant experience building subsonic jets and presumably could handle supersonic jets with time and money. The science behind this is VERY well known. Heck even Burt Rutan can do this, surely the nation of Canada can. Pratt Canada builds lots of gas turbines. They specialize in smaller jets but again given time and money could likely scale up. Radar is a problem. Web searches make me believe that Canada only builds radars for atmospheric research and air traffic control and one military radar, which is used by maritime aircraft for periscope searching. Missiles are another problem. Web searches suggest that Canada builds no missiles and more importantly no seaker heads. They might have to start from scratch on this. So, can Canada build a modern jet? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message
om... Could Canada build a complete modern jet fighter with missiles and radar? Assume they have lots of money (10-20 billion dollars) and seven or so years. Not while they keep electing Liberals. Buying production helicopters, or deciding to buy production helicopters, seems to be at the outer limit of their ability under such leadership. -- Scott Imagine how the war would be different if the liberals were giving aid and comfort to America. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
tscottme wrote:
Charles Talleyrand wrote: Could Canada build a complete modern jet fighter with missiles and radar? Not while they keep electing Liberals. Buying production helicopters, or deciding to buy production helicopters, seems to be at the outer limit of their ability under such leadership. I don't see why Canadian engineers would be *incapable* of it. The political considerations to which you allude are, of course, relevant to whether such a project would be authorised, but my brother-in-law would be more than a bit miffed by the suggestion that they affect his competence as an engineer. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Emmanuel Gustin" wrote in message ...
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message om... So, can Canada build a modern jet? Of course, but the intelligent way to do it is to use an off-the-shelf engine and missiles, and concentrate on the airframe and avionics. Look at Sweden. Developing everything from fresh would guaratuee that the development will be excessively costly or produce partial failures, leading to a repeat of the CF-105 debacle. The other thing to do is to avoid relying top much on US investment or support, as this could easily result in the programme being killed off by the USA as a potential competitor in the export market. I think it would be almost impossible for Canada to build a world class modern jet (roughly typhoon or rafale level) completely on its own within a decade. Even a Gripen level craft would be so tough that the risk would be unacceptable. That kind of disparate design and specialist manufacturing capability cannot be built up in a decade to the required competence anymore. Please note that I do not intend to disparage Canadian scientists, designers and engineers - the task envisioned is a major challenge to any industrial society without recent design experiance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Charles Talleyrand wrote:
Could Canada build a complete modern jet fighter with missiles and radar? Assume they have lots of money (10-20 billion dollars) and seven or so years. We did it before - in fact it was way ahead of its time. But the chicken-**** Conservative government that was in power at the time caved to US pressures to scrap the Arrow. Canada is actually well positioned to build the airframe. Bombardier has very significant experience building subsonic jets and presumably could handle supersonic jets with time and money. The science behind this is VERY well known. Heck even Burt Rutan can do this, surely the nation of Canada can. Pratt Canada builds lots of gas turbines. They specialize in smaller jets but again given time and money could likely scale up. Radar is a problem. Web searches make me believe that Canada only builds radars for atmospheric research and air traffic control and one military radar, which is used by maritime aircraft for periscope searching. Given that our radar satellite systems make the US nervous (didn't we have to agree to reduce resolution on RadarSat during US fly-overs?), I think we can manage this without much trouble. McDonald-Detwiller certainly has the talent to do this... and the folks at several other firms which do international military contracts certainly have additional talent that could be tapped. And the detection systems used on the Cougar (correct designation?) certainly attest to the ability to develop very sophisticated detection and tracking capabilities. Missiles are another problem. Web searches suggest that Canada builds no missiles and more importantly no seaker heads. They might have to start from scratch on this. Common technology --- most countries purchase these from others. And reverse engineering the missles already in inventory isn;t such a hard thing to do. Simple web searches would give all the technology, or one could start with the basics as published in Smithsonian Air & Space a while back... So, can Canada build a modern jet? Hell, yes. I am curious as to why you base your assumptions on the results of "web searches". Nor all companies are so stupid as to place classified, sensitive, or advanced information on the web -- Canadian companies don't tend to use the web to hype their military knowledge as those of some other nations do. Just because it is not on the web doesn't mean it doesn't exist! As the SETI folks are fond of saying: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert Briggs" wrote in message
... tscottme wrote: Charles Talleyrand wrote: Could Canada build a complete modern jet fighter with missiles and radar? Not while they keep electing Liberals. Buying production helicopters, or deciding to buy production helicopters, seems to be at the outer limit of their ability under such leadership. I don't see why Canadian engineers would be *incapable* of it. The political considerations to which you allude are, of course, relevant to whether such a project would be authorised, but my brother-in-law would be more than a bit miffed by the suggestion that they affect his competence as an engineer. Heaven help us from miffed Canadian engineers. I re-read my reply and didn't find the words engineering, competence, or incapable. Don't be so defensive. -- Scott Imagine how the war would be different if the liberals were giving aid and comfort to America. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message om... Could Canada build a complete modern jet fighter with missiles and radar? Assume they have lots of money (10-20 billion dollars) and seven or so years. Canada is actually well positioned to build the airframe. Bombardier has very significant experience building subsonic jets and presumably could handle supersonic jets with time and money. The science behind this is VERY well known. Heck even Burt Rutan can do this, surely the nation of Canada can. Pratt Canada builds lots of gas turbines. They specialize in smaller jets but again given time and money could likely scale up. Radar is a problem. Web searches make me believe that Canada only builds radars for atmospheric research and air traffic control and one military radar, which is used by maritime aircraft for periscope searching. If I recall correctly Litton Systems in Canada made the terrain following radars for the cruise missle - did someone buy them out? Missiles are another problem. Web searches suggest that Canada builds no missiles and more importantly no seaker heads. They might have to start from scratch on this. Many countries skip this part. The big thing is building an airframe and flight controls - very different from a jetliner. It could be done, but we'd be starting from zero and others have a long lead - would it make any sense - no. James Linn |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
We did it before - in fact it was way ahead of its time. But the
chicken-**** Conservative government that was in power at the time caved to US pressures to scrap the Arrow. Oh good christ, not the ****ing Arrow again. I swear, I don't think I know of any country with as many angry, inferiority-complex afflicted people as Canada seems to harbor. Or maybe it's just that most of them somehow end up on this newsgroup. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Ford Prefect" wrote in message ... Charles Talleyrand wrote: Radar is a problem. Web searches make me believe that Canada only builds radars for atmospheric research and air traffic control and one military radar, which is used by maritime aircraft for periscope searching. Given that our radar satellite systems make the US nervous (didn't we have to agree to reduce resolution on RadarSat during US fly-overs?), I think we can manage this without much trouble. McDonald-Detwiller certainly has the talent to do this... and the folks at several other firms which do international military contracts certainly have additional talent that could be tapped. And the detection systems used on the Cougar (correct designation?) certainly attest to the ability to develop very sophisticated detection and tracking capabilities. I think the antenna for the radar for RADARSAT-2 was built by a Canadian company named EMS. I think they used their Atlanta office for this though. Even so, they must have some clue in their two Canadian offices (they have three main engineering offices total). It's the right type of antenna (light weight planar array) http://www.space.gc.ca/asc/eng/csa_s...2/inf_over.asp http://www.emsstg.com/ McDermitt and company only manage and sell the data. Missiles are another problem. Web searches suggest that Canada builds no missiles and more importantly no seaker heads. They might have to start from scratch on this. Common technology --- most countries purchase these from others. And reverse engineering the missles already in inventory isn;t such a hard thing to do. Simple web searches would give all the technology, or one could start with the basics as published in Smithsonian Air & Space a while back... Maybe. I'm sure eventually Canada could do this from first prinipals if need be. I was hoping for an example of Canadian success in the field. I am curious as to why you base your assumptions on the results of "web searches". Nor all companies are so stupid as to place classified, sensitive, or advanced information on the web -- Canadian companies don't tend to use the web to hype their military knowledge as those of some other nations do. Just because it is not on the web doesn't mean it doesn't exist! As the SETI folks are fond of saying: "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!". That's true. But I'm not looking for classified information. However, most companies put up web pages and issue press releases when they win major contracts or make sigificant technological accomplishments. It's absolutley no secret who makes the F/A-18 radar even if some specific techniques are classified. Besides, I don't have a pile of industry pundits camped out in my living room to ask. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAATECH FUEL SYSTEMS SEMINAR JULY 10TH - MIDLAND, Ontario, Canada | Robert Schieck | Home Built | 0 | June 30th 04 08:28 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |
Reflections on first trip to Canada from US | Mike & Janet Larke | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 03 12:57 AM |
[Fwd: Why I'll never build a kit plane.] | Corky Scott | Home Built | 16 | July 28th 03 01:56 AM |