763 Cruising Speed.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Saryon" wrote in message
...

B762 L2J/H 767-200 BOEING
B763 L2J/H 767-300 BOEING
B764 L2J/H 767-400 BOEING

Your assertion was that it's a "673" because you always drop the
leading 7. I can't find 673 anywhere in the list.

I expect those would be apropriate contractions for your correspondence with
FAA, but here in the real world, the first 7 is dropped. Note carefully
that you have been corrected by an engineer,

note carefully you have been corrected by an idiot; who claims that
Part 25 only applies to a minority of aircraft, that a spoiler is a
flap, and that the words "total" and "average" are interchangeable in
aircraft manuals.

an air traffic controller and
pilots. If you want to use an insider secret code, don't expect anyone to
know what you are gibbering about.

mmm yes as usual, little man, the world is wrong and tarver the drunk
is right.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.

Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...

Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673

another item in Tarverworld.

(running with scissors) wrote in message . com...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.

Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...

Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673


utter ****ing ******** as usual little man.

tell us again how the words "average" and "total" are interchangeable
in aircraft manuals.

tell us again how part 25 only applies to a minority of aircraft.

those LSD flashbacks of yours must be bitch. never mind, you can
always down another bottle of thunderbird with your meds little man.

Tarver as usual is full of crap.

Join the real world of aviation.

No one drops the first 7 for Boeing designators. I dare you to provide
a cite where that is done.

Tom Mosher

(Tom Mosher) wrote in message . com...
(running with scissors) wrote in message . com...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.

Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...

Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673


utter ****ing ******** as usual little man.

tell us again how the words "average" and "total" are interchangeable
in aircraft manuals.

tell us again how part 25 only applies to a minority of aircraft.

those LSD flashbacks of yours must be bitch. never mind, you can
always down another bottle of thunderbird with your meds little man.

Tarver as usual is full of crap.

Join the real world of aviation.

Oh my, please no!!!



No one drops the first 7 for Boeing designators. I dare you to provide
a cite where that is done.

Why provide a cite when he's better at selling the pathology? Which do
you think he gets off doing more of? Given the sheer number of plate
appearances and the number of cites actually produced, we already know
the answer

Tom Mosher

"Jon Parmet" wrote in message
om...

No one drops the first 7 for Boeing designators. I dare you to provide
a cite where that is done.

Why provide a cite when he's better at selling the pathology? Which do
you think he gets off doing more of? Given the sheer number of plate
appearances and the number of cites actually produced, we already know
the answer

I answered the guys question and then agreed with our resident ATC.

You may feel free to peruse previous posts to ramisc and you will find the
first 7 is often dropped in conversation.

If you mean to say you want to run with clueless trolls, you have found your
partner, Parmet.