If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
This will be my last post on this. Letters are not that big of a
hassle. Let's face it, they provide no tangible value and a program letter will not prevent the kind of accident you described. If someone builds a home-built then yes, I can see that it might be nice if they crash within 20nm of their home airport, but for factory built gliders the accident rate is almost entirely pilot error. Anyway, it would sure be nice if the SSA could eliminate program letters for factory built gliders. Nuf said. Mark |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Zivley" wrote in message . com... This will be my last post on this. Letters are not that big of a hassle. Let's face it, they provide no tangible value and a program letter will not prevent the kind of accident you described. If someone builds a home-built then yes, I can see that it might be nice if they crash within 20nm of their home airport, but for factory built gliders the accident rate is almost entirely pilot error. Anyway, it would sure be nice if the SSA could eliminate program letters for factory built gliders. Nuf said. Mark Mark. Yes it would be nice if that could happen, but I don't see it happening. The issue is this. You cannot operate an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. You do not qualify for amatuer built/experimental for obvious reasons. It wasn't certified in the US by the manufacturer, so the powers that be created experimental/exhibition&racing. At the time the law was created, sailplanes were a very small blip on the radar and program letters were read very closely if you were operating a warbird, primarily jets. The Fresno incident just about killed non-certified aircraft op's in the country. They are a bit of a hassle, but are necessary because of the class the aircraft operates under. Until the classification requirements change, the program letter is the only thing that allows you to fly. Scott. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
We (SSA) already enjoy quite a few privileges and exemptions that power
pilots don't get. We do have some clout with the FAA, but lets not spend it on meaningless issues. The FAR's have been written in our favor or exemtions granted in the following areas: + We don't need: Radios Transponders ELT's Medicals + We have: Experimental licence that allows us to: Build & inspect our own sailplanes. Fly factory built ships (no US type Cert) Assemble & disassemble without sign-off. My recommendation is to just mail in the program letter each year (the simple one I posted works just fine). Sure it doesn't say anything, but lets save our political muscle for really important things. If we keep asking for meaningless things, the FAA may start to think of us as, "Those snively glider pukes, whining about nothing again". :) JJ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
PA-32 on Experimental Certificate | Mike Granby | Owning | 3 | July 21st 04 03:04 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |