A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Circular Runway



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old April 3rd 04, 10:52 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The tests, it seems, were done on a GM test track with a two-mile
diameter. As the article pointed out, the size of the runway plus the
mind-boggling expense of tunnels to a terminal inside the circle made
the whole thing a non-starter.

On 3 Apr 2004 11:33:43 -0800, (Rick Durden)
wrote:

Funny how aviation ideas just keep recycling. The circular runway was
reported on in an article in Popular Science in the early 1960s as the
airport of the future, banked turn and all.

Never amounted to much. Thank goodness, if you have ever taken off or
landed on a runway with a curve in it, the idea of using one regularly
is not terribly attractive...plus, given the difference in aircraft
speeds the banking cannot eliminate sideloads on the landing gear
which could make for some interesting gear collapses.

All the best,
Rick

jsmith wrote in message ...
Good article in the recent issue of AIR & SPACE.
A USN pilot got the idea for a circular runway after experiencing an
engine failure and landing on a country road.
He proposed the Navy test the idea. He was killed in an accident, but
someone carried the ball got the testing approved.
The tests were satisfactorily completed with Navy jet fighters at
Goodyear's test track.
A 10,000 foot banked oval works at low and high speeds.
Taladega?
Daytona?
(What are the other Super Speedways?)


all the best -- Dan Ford
email:
(put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #32  
Old April 5th 04, 03:11 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CD

Many years ago (1920-1930) in a land far away. Bar stories told about
aircraft operating in SA. They would land in a jungle clearing and
when ready forTO would put a stake in the center of the clearing and
tie a rope to it. They then ran the rope out to bird and looped it
around the strut (or something). Pilot held the end of the rope so it
wouldn't come loose and started to accelerate in a circle.
As he got enough speed to lift off he would let go the rope and fly
away.

If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar.

This not a one April story.

Anyone else heard this story and can confirm it????

Big John
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:


Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time.
You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft
landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from.

Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the
Americans arrived toward the end of 1941.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line!

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com


  #33  
Old April 5th 04, 11:08 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar


Sounds like DC Comics to me!

Not Scorchy Smith or Smilin' Jack, though. They were too realistic.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #34  
Old April 5th 04, 02:41 PM
William W. Plummer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Seaplane drivers can accelerate in a circle in order to get out of a small
lake. No rope to a central point is used.

Circular airfields were built to accomodate airships and blimps.
Lakehurst, NJ, where the Hindenberg disaster occured, still has a circular
field. You can see it from normal scheduled airliners traveling from DCA
to BOS as you approach the JFK VOR if you are sitting on the right of the
plane next to a window.



"Big John" wrote in message
news
CD

Many years ago (1920-1930) in a land far away. Bar stories told about
aircraft operating in SA. They would land in a jungle clearing and
when ready forTO would put a stake in the center of the clearing and
tie a rope to it. They then ran the rope out to bird and looped it
around the strut (or something). Pilot held the end of the rope so it
wouldn't come loose and started to accelerate in a circle.
As he got enough speed to lift off he would let go the rope and fly
away.

If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar.

This not a one April story.

Anyone else heard this story and can confirm it????

Big John
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:


Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time.
You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft
landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from.

Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the
Americans arrived toward the end of 1941.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line!

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com




  #35  
Old April 5th 04, 04:08 PM
Kyler Laird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"William W. Plummer" writes:

Circular airfields were built to accomodate airships and blimps.
Lakehurst, NJ, where the Hindenberg disaster occured, still has a circular
field. You can see it from normal scheduled airliners traveling from DCA
to BOS as you approach the JFK VOR if you are sitting on the right of the
plane next to a window.


For those of us who avoid the "airline experience"...
http://mapper.acme.com/?lat=40.03651...ht=2&do t=Yes
Is that it?

--kyler
  #37  
Old April 5th 04, 11:02 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


For security reasons, subterranean runways/airports were proposed
during WW-II. Perhaps the time has come to consider that proposal
again.


Switzerland in the 1970s (and probably before and since) had
underground hangars built into the mountainside. However, the planes
taxied out of them and onto the highway, which became the runway.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #38  
Old April 6th 04, 02:17 AM
William W. Plummer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kyler Laird" wrote in message
...
"William W. Plummer" writes:

Circular airfields were built to accomodate airships and blimps.
Lakehurst, NJ, where the Hindenberg disaster occured, still has a

circular
field. You can see it from normal scheduled airliners traveling from

DCA
to BOS as you approach the JFK VOR if you are sitting on the right of the
plane next to a window.


For those of us who avoid the "airline experience"...

http://mapper.acme.com/?lat=40.03651...ht=2&do t=Yes
Is that it?


Yes! Now, for extra points, what are the converging lines. If I remember
correctly there are 3 or 4 sets of 4 lines.


  #39  
Old April 7th 04, 01:58 AM
Rob Perkins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub Driver wrote:

For security reasons, subterranean runways/airports were proposed
during WW-II. Perhaps the time has come to consider that proposal
again.


Switzerland in the 1970s (and probably before and since) had
underground hangars built into the mountainside. However, the planes
taxied out of them and onto the highway, which became the runway.


I dunno about that. There isn't a straight stretch of road or highway
in all the mountainous areas of Switzerland, it seems to me. And I've
been on 'em, on those Postal Bus routes. It'd be a mighty short-field
technique taking off from one of those roads!

They do have air bases in CH which have regular-old runways.

Rob
  #40  
Old April 7th 04, 03:24 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Rob Perkins" wrote in message
...
I dunno about that. There isn't a straight stretch of road or highway
in all the mountainous areas of Switzerland, it seems to me. And I've
been on 'em, on those Postal Bus routes. It'd be a mighty short-field
technique taking off from one of those roads!


Dan is exactly correct. Air & Space Magazine ran a feature about it a few
years ago. The highways used for runways are straight enough, and they have
a removable divider between the lane directions so that the aircraft have
use of the full width of the pavement.

Perhaps they do use short-field techniques, but they do have air bases in
mountain-sides and they do use the highway for the runway.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Owning 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM
Moving violation..NASA form? Nasir Piloting 47 November 5th 03 07:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.