A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Looks Like the AF Is Wanting Survivable Support Aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 29th 04, 05:20 AM
sid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Looks Like the AF Is Wanting Survivable Support Aircraft

There were some interesting articles this past week. First one is
"New, Stealthy Aircraft Eyed for Special Ops Forces". According to
Janes this offering is apparently coming out of a classified
initiative:
http://www.janes.com/defence/air_for...0217_1_n.shtml
Dubbed "MACK" for M-X; A-X; a regular airlifter, C-X; and a future
tanker, K-X, it is being offered up for AFSOC use. It is also being
considered for a stealthy penetrating tanker role (ASWT Feb 23):
"Moreover, U.S. Air Force representatives have indicated interest in a
stealthy tanker to support their stealthy attack platforms, the
F/A-22, F-35 and B-2, to make them less susceptible to attack while
they refuel. To adequately satisfy that demand, Lockheed Martin has
devised a stealth shrouding for the refueling "boom."

With the 767 deal all but dead...: http://www.ddn.com/
"Going, Going, Gone? Even Wall Street seems to be getting a bit tired
of the Air Force's protracted plans to acquire 100 KC-767 tankers from
Boeing. A Morgan Stanley analyst writes in a recent report that
reports of further delays--and even cancellation--are likely true. But
that's just as well, the analyst writes. "The tanker deal was becoming
so wrought with additional baggage that the deal was looking less and
less likely to occur, in our view," according to the report. "Frankly,
we believe it would be better for [Boeing] if the deal died sooner
rather than later given the company is expending about $90
[million]/Qtr on the deal."...And the number one priority of Boeing in
recent years has been to listen to Wall Street.
....Boeing is getting into the act as well with their Blended Wing Body
concept(AWST Feb23):
"Boeing is also pushing the BWB concept for a potential air refueling
tanker, which would be able to carry massive amounts of fuel and
provide two permanent boom refueling stations, rather than one as in
the KC-135, KC-10 or KC-767."
"Boeing doesn't have any other aircraft to use for that purpose once
the 767 line shuts down. To achieve the efficiency goals the company
is touting for the 7E7, engineers are making structural trade-offs
that mean the airliner can't be converted into a tanker, according to
several Boeing officials."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which GPS Support LNAV/VNAV? C Kingsbury Instrument Flight Rules 1 October 23rd 04 12:28 AM
24/7 computer tech support [email protected] Home Built 0 May 5th 04 03:32 AM
USAFE commander: 86th Airlift Wing will divide for combat, support operations Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 27th 03 11:31 PM
[AU] Defence support for Bush visit David Bromage Military Aviation 7 October 23rd 03 05:04 AM
Hurt pilots form a support group at Fort Campbell Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 24th 03 11:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.