If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
To achieve this he made it as automotive as possible, with the yoke
working as a steering wheel on the ground, and the rudder pedals eliminated completely. (The rudders are interconnected with the ailerons, and work remarkably well at keeping the ball centered.) So why didn't it catch on? In _Stick and Rudder_ Wolfgang regularly sings its praises, without actually naming it. I think it's a bit too weird for most pilots to land in a crab. In a cross-wind, without rudders you can't kick it straight, so you touch down in a crab, which feels VERY strange the first few times you do it. There's also the problem of not being able to cross-control/slip without rudder pedals. If (for example) you're high on final approach in the Ercoupe there's nothing you can do to correct it but retard the throttle. If that's not enough to get your glide slope nailed, your only option is to go around. And, finally, it's sort of like asking why there are still manual transmission cars on the road, when the automatic transmission has proven itself to be superior in nearly all regards. Some people (myself included) *like* to have full control of their vehicles, and that's what the rudder pedals allow. The nose-wheel/yoke connection sure makes a lot of sense though, doesn't it? Ground steering with your feet never made/makes much sense to me. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 Ercoupe N94856 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
"Jay Honeck" wrote in
news:OWdqk.303325$yE1.116320@attbi_s21: To achieve this he made it as automotive as possible, with the yoke working as a steering wheel on the ground, and the rudder pedals eliminated completely. (The rudders are interconnected with the ailerons, and work remarkably well at keeping the ball centered.) So why didn't it catch on? In _Stick and Rudder_ Wolfgang regularly sings its praises, without actually naming it. I think it's a bit too weird for most pilots to land in a crab. In a cross-wind, without rudders you can't kick it straight, so you touch down in a crab, which feels VERY strange the first few times you do it. There's also the problem of not being able to cross-control/slip without rudder pedals. If (for example) you're high on final approach in the Ercoupe there's nothing you can do to correct it but retard the throttle. If that's not enough to get your glide slope nailed, your only option is to go around. And, finally, it's sort of like asking why there are still manual transmission cars on the road, when the automatic transmission has proven itself to be superior in nearly all regards. Some people (myself included) *like* to have full control of their vehicles, and that's what the rudder pedals allow. You having full control of an airplane? You just admitted you kcik it straight" in a crosswind..... Don't make me laugh. Oh wait, Do. Bertie |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
Dudley Henriques wrote:
Rocky Stevens wrote: On Aug 16, 1:01 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: People of all ages never do anything unless there is something in it for them. I would imagine terms like "charity" and "selfless act" have no meaning to you. What was "in it" for Michael A. Monsoor when he threw himself on a grenade to save his comrades? People who believe the sentiment expressed by the poster you have answered have no feeling whatsoever for the acts of people like Monsoor. To them, all that exists is the search for an ulterior motive which they either assume or create. -- Dudley Henriques IIRC, the original act that MX questioned was somebody saying, "go **** yourself". Not exactly on par with somebody throwing themselves on a grenade. Tell me moron, is there ANYONE on this forum left with a brain? You have mixed me up with another poster. Somebody called ) whatever or whoever the **** that is! I wasn't even remotely involved in the discussion as you have indicated. In other words, it WASN'T me he was referencing you ****ing moron! Get a ****ing life will you please! Oh, there are still many people on this forum with brains. We've just decided not to contribute to the idiocy of MX. I still read the threads (for a bit) because once in a while, I need to be reminded that there really is something less interesting than cleaning the bathroom. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
Dudley Henriques wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote: Dudley Henriques writes: Tell me moron, is there ANYONE on this forum left with a brain? You have mixed me up with another poster. Somebody called ) whatever or whoever the **** that is! I wasn't even remotely involved in the discussion as you have indicated. In other words, it WASN'T me he was referencing you ****ing moron! Get a ****ing life will you please! I feel like I'm reading one of Martin Scorsese's scripts. As mad as I've been lately, it's getting to be more like Sam Peckenpaugh :-)) More like a combination of Quentin Tarantino and Theodor Geisel |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
On Aug 18, 12:59*pm, Blanche wrote:
[...] Oh, there are still many people on this forum with brains. We've just decided not to contribute to the idiocy of MX. I still read the threads (for a bit) because once in a while, I need to be reminded that *there really is something less interesting than cleaning the bathroom. Nice The following may help those that need to stop: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI2RupGZ_D4&feature=related |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
Blanche wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: Dudley Henriques writes: Tell me moron, is there ANYONE on this forum left with a brain? You have mixed me up with another poster. Somebody called ) whatever or whoever the **** that is! I wasn't even remotely involved in the discussion as you have indicated. In other words, it WASN'T me he was referencing you ****ing moron! Get a ****ing life will you please! I feel like I'm reading one of Martin Scorsese's scripts. As mad as I've been lately, it's getting to be more like Sam Peckenpaugh :-)) More like a combination of Quentin Tarantino and Theodor Geisel I think you might have a point there Blanche, and please forgive the harsh language in some other posts. -- Dudley Henriques |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
Jay Honeck writes:
The nose-wheel/yoke connection sure makes a lot of sense though, doesn't it? Ground steering with your feet never made/makes much sense to me. Agreed. Are there any other aircraft that you can steer on the ground with the yoke? |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
Mxsmanic wrote:
Jay Honeck writes: The nose-wheel/yoke connection sure makes a lot of sense though, doesn't it? Ground steering with your feet never made/makes much sense to me. Agreed. Are there any other aircraft that you can steer on the ground with the yoke? Just about every airplane use for primary instruction when taxied for the first time by a new student (until the instructor shows them how to use their feet :-)))) -- Dudley Henriques |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Let's move on
On Aug 17, 11:10 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Jay Honeck writes: The Ercoupe is incredibly easy to fly -- it was designed by Fred Weick (the guy who later designed the Cherokee) to be "Everyman's Plane", the plane that anyone can fly with minimal training after they come back from WWII. To achieve this he made it as automotive as possible, with the yoke working as a steering wheel on the ground, and the rudder pedals eliminated completely. (The rudders are interconnected with the ailerons, and work remarkably well at keeping the ball centered.) So why didn't it catch on? In _Stick and Rudder_ Wolfgang regularly sings its praises, without actually naming it. He actually does mention it a couple of times; it is what first gave me the thought of getting one. I hate steering with my feet! |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Ercoupe for training
On Aug 17, 9:33 pm, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
Much of his design innovations have become standard in all planes (an electric starter, all-metal construction, etc.) and were quite modern for the time -- but much of them did NOT become standard, meaning that learning to fly in an Ercoupe is pretty much a developmental dead-end. You'll never know how to fly a plane with rudder pedals if you train in one that only has a brake pedal on the floor! That is what I thought at first as well, but then I got to thinking: I learned to drive in an automatic, and later learned to drive a stick. Also, many people learn to fly with fixed gear, and then later go on to retractable (though as far as I know there is not that much difference there besides remembering to lower the gear). In any event, I do not have the guts to buy a plane right now; I am notoriously cheap (which makes me a REAL genius for taking up flying). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Birds are on the move... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 12 | October 26th 07 07:28 AM |
Nothing to see here ...move along folks. | Montblack | Home Built | 0 | December 30th 06 01:41 AM |
How to move a T hanger? | liteflyer 1 | Home Built | 3 | May 31st 06 06:43 AM |
Move Over Moller | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 16 | March 9th 05 01:39 PM |
ex-Oriskany on the move | Mike Weeks | Naval Aviation | 1 | December 17th 04 04:32 PM |