If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
peculiar approach chart
Dave Butler wrote:
I stumbled on this chart while preparing for an upcoming flight to Knoxville: http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0604/00218HIL5L.PDF I see some unfamiliar graphics on this chart, namely the dotted lines in both the profile and plan views, and the candy-striping at the top and bottom of the page. I perused the legend at http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/frntmatter.pdf but don't see any description or explanation of these graphic elements. The procedure is named "HI-ILS...". What is that? High altitude? High speed? I notice that there are published transitions starting at 13000 feet, and also that there are minima listed for approach category E, whereas most approaches seem to show only categories ABCD. A PDF search of the AIM at http://www.faa.gov/ATPubs/AIM/AIM.pdf for the string "HI-ILS" produced no hits. A google search of rec.aviation.ifr produced some hits, including the information that a HI-ILS approach is a military procedure, and noting that "...the approaches in question are not published in the civil US Terminal Procedures Publications". I guess that's now changed. So if these approaches are now published in the civil publications, shouldn't the graphics be described in the corresponding legend publication? Anyway, what is the significance of the candy stripes and the dotted lines? For reference, there is also a corresponding ILS approach to the same runway: http://www.naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0604/00218IL5L.PDF Might I ever fly a HI-ILS approach in my Mooney? Dave These are high altitude procedures published for the military unit (TN ANG) at Knoxville. These procedures were built by the FAA specifically for the military users at Knoxville. The criteria for military high procedures also allow for different descent gradients and arc distances than civil procedures. You may also have noticed that some of the altitudes are depicted differently than you may be used to (mandatory altitudes and "block" altitudes vs minimum altitudes) These aren't published in the normal FLIPS, just the High FLIPS that have the black and white stripes on the edges. John |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
peculiar approach chart
"Peter R." wrote in message
... Dave Butler wrote: I stumbled on this chart while preparing for an upcoming flight to Knoxville: This type of approach and chart was just published for my home airport of Syracuse, NY, too: http://www.myairplane.com/databases/.../00411HI28.PDF Interestingly, JeppView (electronic chart delivery) does not include these charts for SYR. -- Peter I've seen several of those to military bases in an old alaska TP book I have... with segments of the approach at FL200, etc.. hehe! -- Mike Teague - Vancouver WA, USA -- Opie and Anthony - XM Satellite Radio - http://www.opieandanthony.com -- Phil Hendrie = Radio Genius - http://www.philhendrieshow.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 06:51 PM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |