If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Alternate same as departure?
Can you file the departure airport as the alternate?
Two airports in the middle of nowhere 40 miles apart. I can't think of another reasonable option. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
dlevy wrote:
Can you file the departure airport as the alternate? Certainly. Nobody cares or checks on what you've filed anyway. If they did, there's nothing wrong with having the departure airport as a filed alternate. Two airports in the middle of nowhere 40 miles apart. I can't think of another reasonable option. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
dlevy wrote: Can you file the departure airport as the alternate? Two airports in the middle of nowhere 40 miles apart. I can't think of another reasonable option. Sure you can file your origin as your alternate. There's no reason not to. All an alternate means is someplace you've pre-computed you should (according to specific criteria laid out in part 91) be able to get into if your destination becomes unusable. If your goal is to get someplace, turning around and going back home may not be very useful, but it's certainly legal. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If your goal is to get someplace, turning around and going back home
may not be very useful, but it's certainly legal. It may be very useful. If you have a "there or nowhere" destination - meaning if you can't get in there, you might as well never have left home - and your home is a valid alternate, it makes no sense not to use it. Whenever I make a business trip from Houston to Austin when the weather is iffy in Austin but not in Houston, I file my alternate back in Houston. If I can't get in at Austin, it does me no good to get in somewhere 50 miles away with no arrangements for ground transport. I'm going to miss my meeting anyway, so I might as well turn around and go home. Michael |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 7 Dec 2004 12:17:31 -0800, "Michael"
wrote: Whenever I make a business trip from Houston to Austin when the weather is iffy in Austin but not in Houston, I file my alternate back in Houston. If I can't get in at Austin, it does me no good to get in somewhere 50 miles away with no arrangements for ground transport. I'm going to miss my meeting anyway, so I might as well turn around and go home. Michael So what difference does it make what your alternate is? If you want to go back to Houston, you go back to Houston, whether your alternate is Houston, New Orleans or Hong Kong. You don't have to go to your alternate if you don't wnat to, ever. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
iYou don't have to go to your alternate if you don't wnat to,
ever./i True. But why bother with working out your actual Plan B, making sure fuel and weather are going to be OK for it - and then filing something else? I generally make it a point to file as my alternate what I really intend to use, unless legalities prevent me from doing so. Michael |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 7 Dec 2004 14:39:26 -0800, "Michael"
wrote: iYou don't have to go to your alternate if you don't wnat to, ever./i True. But why bother with working out your actual Plan B, making sure fuel and weather are going to be OK for it - and then filing something else? I generally make it a point to file as my alternate what I really intend to use, unless legalities prevent me from doing so. Michael You said this: "Whenever I make a business trip from Houston to Austin when the weather is iffy in Austin but not in Houston, I file my alternate back in Houston. If I can't get in at Austin, it does me no good to get in somewhere 50 miles away with no arrangements for ground transport" implying that you would be stuck going "fifty miles away" just because it was filed as an alternate. This isn't true, and maybe it wasn't what you intended to suggest. You could go back to Houston regardless. If you intended to say that it saved the trouble of a separate flight plan to a different alternate to compute fuel requirements, I agree. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"dlevy" wrote in news:7_0td.36539$Dm2.20820
@bignews1.bellsouth.net: Can you file the departure airport as the alternate? Certainly. I do it all the time. As long as it meets the weather requirements and you have the fuel onboard, you can use it. -- Regards, Stan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In a previous article, "dlevy" said:
Can you file the departure airport as the alternate? I'm pretty sure one of the cross country questions in the IFR "written" does exactly that. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Simulated editor war, conducted by seasoned professionals in a controlled environment. Don't try this at home. -- Christian Bauernfeind |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:54:29 -0600, "dlevy" wrote:
Can you file the departure airport as the alternate? Does it qualify as an alternate? Two airports in the middle of nowhere 40 miles apart. I can't think of another reasonable option. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Notes on NACO Obstacle Departure Procedures | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | July 15th 04 10:20 PM |
Interesting Departure Procedu MRB Trixy Two | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 18th 04 11:42 PM |
Alternate Intersection Name in Brackets? | Marco Leon | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | January 22nd 04 04:55 AM |
Requirement to fly departure procedures | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | October 15th 03 06:39 PM |
Alternate requirements | Anthony Chambers | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 17th 03 09:45 PM |