A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Aviation Marketplace
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware !



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old June 21st 04, 08:57 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in
:

What does the price of a plane have to do with its airworthiness?


Maybe the fact that price is usually a measure of "suitability for a
purpose"?


Really? On what planet, Tom?

When did the FAA include price of the airplane in its definition of
airworthiness?


It doesn't, "economic reality" does.


Boy, you sure have an active imagination. Of course, this only applies to
the resale price of an airplane, doesn't it? It doesn't apply to the
acquisition price, because then, according to your rules, anything goes,
doesn't it? Capitalistic airworthiness at its best?

(Geez...you should have learned this before entering elementary school)


I missed Dumb Rationalizations 101. On purpose.

  #32  
Old June 21st 04, 09:20 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:57:37 +0000, Juan Jimenez wrote:

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in
:

What does the price of a plane have to do with its airworthiness?


Maybe the fact that price is usually a measure of "suitability for a
purpose"?


Really? On what planet, Tom?


Ya, I had this same thought. Price rarely is a measure of suitability for
a purpose. I agree with ya. In fact, suitability, quality, price, and
popularity often have little to do with each other.

When did the FAA include price of the airplane in its definition of
airworthiness?


It doesn't, "economic reality" does.


Boy, you sure have an active imagination. Of course, this only applies to
the resale price of an airplane, doesn't it? It doesn't apply to the
acquisition price, because then, according to your rules, anything goes,
doesn't it? Capitalistic airworthiness at its best?


I know. It's kind of funny. Accordingly, if we run with his logic, there
are never deals to be had in aviation. In fact, we can ignore every
social issue which affects mankind such as money problems, loss of
interest, medical problems, or desire to rapidly acquire another
possession. Nope, paying absoluete top dollar is the only way to aquire
anything of worth. I wonder if he purchased anything other than new, and
paid above sticker to boot? If he did, he clearly got ripped off.

Just having some fun with the obvious, which was seemingly overlooked
in the grandparent message.


Cheers,

Greg


  #33  
Old June 21st 04, 09:26 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Juan Jimenez wrote in message .. .
"Richard Kaplan" wrote in
s.com:


Why do you think this airplane is "super low priced"?

Why would it be priced that low if it were airworthy?


What does the price of a plane have to do with its airworthiness? When did
the FAA include price of the airplane in its definition of airworthiness?


What FAR requires a plane to be Airworthy to sell? Sounds like the
owner was willing to sell a project plane cheaply. The fact that he
wasn't upfront about it is annoying, but sadly, the norm. When I was
looking at Champs 4 out of 5 were not technically airworthy according
to ADs. That doesn't make them illegal to sell, or a bad deal.

-Robert
  #35  
Old June 21st 04, 11:35 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Copeland wrote in
news
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:57:37 +0000, Juan Jimenez wrote:

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in
:

What does the price of a plane have to do with its airworthiness?

Maybe the fact that price is usually a measure of "suitability for a
purpose"?


Really? On what planet, Tom?


Ya, I had this same thought. Price rarely is a measure of suitability
for a purpose. I agree with ya. In fact, suitability, quality,
price, and popularity often have little to do with each other.

When did the FAA include price of the airplane in its definition of
airworthiness?

It doesn't, "economic reality" does.


Boy, you sure have an active imagination. Of course, this only
applies to the resale price of an airplane, doesn't it? It doesn't
apply to the acquisition price, because then, according to your
rules, anything goes, doesn't it? Capitalistic airworthiness at its
best?


I know. It's kind of funny. Accordingly, if we run with his logic,
there are never deals to be had in aviation. In fact, we can ignore
every social issue which affects mankind such as money problems, loss
of interest, medical problems, or desire to rapidly acquire another
possession. Nope, paying absoluete top dollar is the only way to
aquire anything of worth. I wonder if he purchased anything other than
new, and paid above sticker to boot? If he did, he clearly got ripped
off.

Just having some fun with the obvious, which was seemingly overlooked
in the grandparent message.


Cheers,

Greg


No reply needed. Well put.


  #36  
Old June 22nd 04, 12:26 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
Juan Jimenez wrote in message

.. .
"Richard Kaplan" wrote in
s.com:


Why do you think this airplane is "super low priced"?

Why would it be priced that low if it were airworthy?


What does the price of a plane have to do with its airworthiness? When

did
the FAA include price of the airplane in its definition of

airworthiness?

What FAR requires a plane to be Airworthy to sell? Sounds like the
owner was willing to sell a project plane cheaply. The fact that he
wasn't upfront about it is annoying, but sadly, the norm. When I was
looking at Champs 4 out of 5 were not technically airworthy according
to ADs. That doesn't make them illegal to sell, or a bad deal.

-Robert


If you look hard enough 10 out of 10 airplanes are unairworthy. Nowhere did
the buyer justify his claim the plane was not airworthy. His post sounded
to me like he seriously failed in his questioning before looking at the
plane then tried to blame the seller for his poor questioning. His
assumptions were based on what he thought he heard and wanted to hear not on
what the seller said. Jim Weir hit the nail squarely on the head on this
one.


  #37  
Old June 22nd 04, 12:27 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:57:37 +0000, Juan Jimenez wrote:

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in
:

What does the price of a plane have to do with its airworthiness?

Maybe the fact that price is usually a measure of "suitability for a
purpose"?


Really? On what planet, Tom?


This one. What planets version of "value" (which determines price) are YOU
using? Kalifornia's?

Ya, I had this same thought. Price rarely is a measure of suitability for
a purpose. I agree with ya. In fact, suitability, quality, price, and
popularity often have little to do with each other.


Really? On what planet?


  #38  
Old June 22nd 04, 12:28 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...
Greg Copeland wrote in
news

Just having some fun with the obvious, which was seemingly overlooked
in the grandparent message.


Cheers,

Greg


No reply needed. Well put.


Well put bull ****.

No wonder you get taken.


  #39  
Old June 22nd 04, 12:29 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
Juan Jimenez wrote in message

.. .
"Richard Kaplan" wrote in
s.com:


Why do you think this airplane is "super low priced"?

Why would it be priced that low if it were airworthy?


What does the price of a plane have to do with its airworthiness? When

did
the FAA include price of the airplane in its definition of

airworthiness?

What FAR requires a plane to be Airworthy to sell? Sounds like the
owner was willing to sell a project plane cheaply. The fact that he
wasn't upfront about it is annoying, but sadly, the norm. When I was
looking at Champs 4 out of 5 were not technically airworthy according
to ADs. That doesn't make them illegal to sell, or a bad deal.

He must not have ever heard of "parting out", "fixer upper"...


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cessna 182T w. G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 63 July 22nd 04 07:06 PM
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! Bill Berle Home Built 73 June 25th 04 04:53 AM
Cessna Steel Landing Gears, J-3 Seat Sling For Auction Bill Berle Home Built 0 February 19th 04 06:51 PM
Cessna Steel Landing Gears, J-3 Seat Sling For Auction Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 0 February 19th 04 06:51 PM
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Aviation Marketplace 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.