If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
I'm looking for a 35-50 hp 2 stroke suitable for a legal 103.7
ultralight. Anybody here know of a Rotax 477 or 503 - or a suitable substitute that is not being used by some other fool? Now I know that "friends don't let friends fly 2 strokes", but with the (bleepin') catch-22 in the spot pilot rules, that about all that's left to me. Richard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
Hows about a 1/2 VW? I think Len Milholland's 1/2 does about 30-35 HP.
Not sure what the finished weight is though... Scott Richard Lamb wrote: I'm looking for a 35-50 hp 2 stroke suitable for a legal 103.7 ultralight. Anybody here know of a Rotax 477 or 503 - or a suitable substitute that is not being used by some other fool? Now I know that "friends don't let friends fly 2 strokes", but with the (bleepin') catch-22 in the spot pilot rules, that about all that's left to me. Richard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
I'm not sure if the weihgt is similar, but Hummel also makes a 1/2 VW
engine but in all of their planes it puts it over US ultralight weights. IIRC (and I might not), the difference between the equivalent 2-stroke Rotax was around 25 pounds. If you start out with a light enough design to begin with it might make it. One major plus with the 1/2 VW is the fuel consumption. From what I've heard it's down around 1.3GPH. That's some pretty cheap flying . |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
Weight is always an issue. But it's not the only one.
Leonard's approach keeps the block intact (not cut in half), so it will be a little heavier than needed. It is sturdier, tho. The real down side to ANY 1/2 VW setup is the vibration. It's a low frequency - high amplitude shake that is not ok on an extremely light airframe. I also have doubts about the 30-35 HP specification. VW engines are fin area limited. While they can make the claimed power - for a short time - once the heat limit is reached, the power MUST be reduced to avoid overheating and failures. I'd believe 20 to MAYBE 25 hp continuous. Lastly, there he RPM issue. In order to make power, the engine has to be spun up. That requires a VERY short propeller, and LESS than 50% prop effeciency. My most recent parasol (I hate to say my LAST parasol, but...) has a Great Plains 2180 VW on it. It also has a 60 inch long Tennessee Props propeller. The long prop limits max rpm to less than 3000 static. That's well below the RPM needed for max HP, but it's still high enough on the torque curev to pull ok. The long prop increases prop effeceincy to the point that overall performance is actually quite good. With all the accessories, that engine weighs in ar 208 lbs (!). So, all things considered, I think a two-stroke would be the proper choice for a true ultralight. 254 pounds is a damned difficult limit. Richard (Pardon, please, my spelling errors. Posting via Yahoo has it's limits too) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
("Richard Lamb" wrote)
[snips] Weight is always an issue. But it's not the only one. I also have doubts about the 30-35 HP specification. VW engines are fin area limited. While they can make the claimed power - for a short time - once the heat limit is reached, the power MUST be reduced to avoid overheating and failures. I'd believe 20 to MAYBE 25 hp continuous. So, all things considered, I think a two-stroke would be the proper choice for a true ultralight. 254 pounds is a damned difficult limit. http://www.aero-works.net/store/detail.aspx?ID=87 Horsepower 16.5 HP, Weight 7.85 lbs., Length 7.3 inches, Width 12.5 inches, Propeller sizes 28 x 10, 32 x 12 ........$1,495.95 Two of these gives you 33 hp at 16 lbs. What the heck ...a Tri-Motor. 50 hp for 24 lbs. g Original CriCri had two 9 hp engines and it still managed 100+ mph. http://www.flight.cz/cricri/english/...escription.php "Nowadays, builders are using engines Valmet, JPX, Limbach, 3W, Rotax, Zenoah, Hirth, and I am glad to see, that are recommended also Czech ZDZ Model." (For people [like me] who enjoy Googling for more information - engines) Montblack CriCri list at Yahoo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
Montblack wrote: http://www.aero-works.net/store/detail.aspx?ID=87 Horsepower 16.5 HP, Weight 7.85 lbs., Length 7.3 inches, Width 12.5 inches, Propeller sizes 28 x 10, 32 x 12 ........$1,495.95 What's the TBO on that engine, one hour or two? -- FF |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
wrote What's the TBO on that engine, one hour or two? I have seen little engines of that type that are surprisedly well built. Details such as roller bearing on the crankshaft, and needle bearings on the rod large end. Nickel coated iron sleeve, and ringed piston. They will run many hours without attention, if kept cool and well lubricated. The biggest issue I see with those engines is the fact that it is not a mixture controllable carb. I suppose you could rig up something to adjust the needle settings. How about a 1 person B-17? Or a lay down B-29, with the pilot looking out the nose? Oh, I've got it! A B-36! Add some of those model jet engines! 6 turnin' and 4 burnin'! BFG -- Jim in NC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
Richard Riley wrote: On 16 Oct 2005 14:08:00 -0700, "Richard Lamb" wrote: :I'm looking for a 35-50 hp 2 stroke suitable for a legal 103.7 :ultralight. Anybody here know of a Rotax 477 or 503 - or a suitable :substitute that is not being used by some other fool? Take a look at these, especially the weight... http://www.zanzotteraengines.com/498ai.htm http://www.ultralightnews.com/sunfun2001/zanzottera.htm Zonzonetta says they are buidling for the UAV market, it is far from clear that they would knowingly sell for a manned aircraft. That said, has anyone ever seen price information for one of these? -- FF |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ultralight motors?
No pricing shown on their web page.
And the gearbox info was a little thin. But that 498 does look like a potential winner. Richard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultralight rotorcraft | Skywise | Piloting | 27 | July 15th 05 02:56 AM |
Ultralight down in Eastern Oregon | Harry K | Home Built | 9 | March 29th 05 06:26 PM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
AL-12: New ultralight sailplane | ISoar | Soaring | 4 | March 24th 04 01:52 AM |
Ultralight magazine August 1981 | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | July 20th 03 04:34 AM |