If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
I have a firm opportunity to take a much higher paying job and expand
my education but taking the family might be difficult. If I have to leave them I'd like to find some way to fly myself back and forth for frequent visits for the 4-5 years I will be there. Flying commercial is not an option as it is a 8-9 hour trip each way tied to carrier schedules once driving to/from major carrier airports is included. I know there are plenty of planes that can cruise in the 200+ range, however, so flying myself would be an alternative as both locations have airpots within 10 miles of town centers. I only need to carry myself and minor luggage so passenger capacity isn't a concern. My mission requirements are a 700 nm range with reserve and a flight time under 4 hours facing occasional IMC weather as I will be flying between GA and east Texas. I'd also prefer something with as low a fuel burn as possible for cost savings. In investigating this, it looks like a Cozy/Aerocanard is going to be the way to go. With a 1000 mile range, service ceilings approaching class A and greater than 200 mph cruise I can't find anything else that matches this in an affordable package to build. As I have past experience as an auto mechanic, being able to work on the plane to keep costs down is important so I'm going to have to go with something I build myself. Are there any good alternatives outside the canard family? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
es330td wrote:
My mission requirements are a 700 nm range with reserve and a flight time under 4 hours facing occasional IMC weather as I will be flying between GA and east Texas. I'd also prefer something with as low a fuel burn as possible for cost savings. Vans RV-7 - http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-7int.htm Vans RV-8 also meets the speed and range requirements but as a tandem may not have enough panel space for IFR. Mustang II - http://www.mustangaero.com/Mustang%20II/MustangII.html Lancair Legacy FG - http://www.lancair.com/Main/legacy.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:11:39 +1000, Michael Henry
wrote: es330td wrote: My mission requirements are a 700 nm range with reserve and a flight time under 4 hours facing occasional IMC weather as I will be flying between GA and east Texas. I'd also prefer something with as low a fuel burn as possible for cost savings. Vans RV-7 - http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-7int.htm Vans RV-8 also meets the speed and range requirements but as a tandem may not have enough panel space for IFR. Mustang II - http://www.mustangaero.com/Mustang%20II/MustangII.html Lancair Legacy FG - http://www.lancair.com/Main/legacy.html Thorp T18 !!!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
es330td wrote:
My mission requirements are a 700 nm range with reserve and a flight time under 4 hours facing occasional IMC weather as I will be flying between GA and east Texas. I'd also prefer something with as low a fuel burn as possible for cost savings. Michael Henry wrote: Vans RV-7 - http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-7int.htm Vans RV-8 also meets the speed and range requirements but as a tandem may not have enough panel space for IFR. I would recommend a Van's RV for several reasons: - excellent builder support along your route (RV builders area everywhere) - excellent aircraft for high-speed cruise, low fuel consumption, low-airspeed takeoffs and landings at short fields, providing more options |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
On Jul 7, 2:04*pm, John Smith wrote:
es330td wrote: My mission requirements are a 700 nm range with reserve and a flight time under 4 hours facing occasional IMC weather as I will be flying between GA and east Texas. *I'd also prefer something with as low a fuel burn as possible for cost savings. *Michael Henry wrote: Vans RV-7 -http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-7int.htm Vans RV-8 also meets the speed and range requirements but as a tandem may not have enough panel space for IFR. I would recommend a Van's RV for several reasons: - excellent builder support along your route (RV builders area everywhere) - excellent aircraft for high-speed cruise, low fuel consumption, low-airspeed takeoffs and landings at short fields, providing more options IIRC, there are more RV's out there than any other homebuilt. Before I posted I checked out the -7 but was a little concerned about the range. According to AIRNAV, the distance between my airports of interest is 684 nm direct and my path takes me through/around the general aviator's Hell that is Hartsfield-Jackson. They aren't always accomodating to GA IFR pilots and will route you all over the place. Depending on whether I am coming or going, if I am VFR I can just cancel and fly under the class B or file a pop-up IFR but if I have to take off or land in IMC I have to let them send me where they will. With a 775 sm range at 75% power on the -7 I start running into problems of getting low on fuel and pushing into my reserve if the flight encounters any kind of rerouting. I can, of course, slow down but now I start getting over 4 hours and given that a lot of my flying would be early evening I'd rather not push myself. I'm not scratching any reasonable plane off my list just yet; in fact, this doesn't become viable until I get my IFR ticket which is at least a year off. It doesn't hurt to start educating myself because I can always start building even before I am ready for cross country commuting. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
"es330td" wrote IIRC, there are more RV's out there than any other homebuilt. Before I posted I checked out the -7 but was a little concerned about the range. Hey, it's called experimental for a reason. You can add extra fuel capacity, yourself. Tip tanks come to mind, since they can be added without adding extra stress to the wing spar, or connections of the wing to the plane. Well built ones could probably lower the stall speed, and possibly add to the gross payload, too. -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:35:28 -0700 (PDT), es330td
wrote: On Jul 7, 2:04*pm, John Smith wrote: es330td wrote: My mission requirements are a 700 nm range with reserve and a flight time under 4 hours facing occasional IMC weather as I will be flying between GA and east Texas. *I'd also prefer something with as low a fuel burn as possible for cost savings. *Michael Henry wrote: Vans RV-7 -http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-7int.htm Vans RV-8 also meets the speed and range requirements but as a tandem may not have enough panel space for IFR. I would recommend a Van's RV for several reasons: - excellent builder support along your route (RV builders area everywhere) - excellent aircraft for high-speed cruise, low fuel consumption, low-airspeed takeoffs and landings at short fields, providing more options IIRC, there are more RV's out there than any other homebuilt. Before I posted I checked out the -7 but was a little concerned about the range. According to AIRNAV, the distance between my airports of interest is 684 nm direct and my path takes me through/around the general aviator's Hell that is Hartsfield-Jackson. They aren't always accomodating to GA IFR pilots and will route you all over the place. Depending on whether I am coming or going, if I am VFR I can just cancel and fly under the class B or file a pop-up IFR but if I have to take off or land in IMC I have to let them send me where they will. With a 775 sm range at 75% power on the -7 I start running into problems of getting low on fuel and pushing into my reserve if the flight encounters any kind of rerouting. I can, of course, slow down but now I start getting over 4 hours and given that a lot of my flying would be early evening I'd rather not push myself. I'm not scratching any reasonable plane off my list just yet; in fact, this doesn't become viable until I get my IFR ticket which is at least a year off. It doesn't hurt to start educating myself because I can always start building even before I am ready for cross country commuting. have you ever realised that the fuel caps come off pretty easily. you could refuel enroute :-) it is not as though you are flying california to hawaii. Stealth (easily overlooked) Pilot |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:32:08 +0800, Stealth Pilot
wrote: have you ever realised that the fuel caps come off pretty easily. you could refuel enroute :-) http://www.bowersflybaby.com/stories/longrange.jpg Ron Wanttaja |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
On Jul 7, 5:35�pm, es330td wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:04�pm, John Smith wrote: I'm not scratching any reasonable plane off my list just yet; in fact, this doesn't become viable until I get my IFR ticket which is at least a year off. �It doesn't hurt to start educating myself because I can always start building even before I am ready for cross country commuting.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - When you start your IFR training and flying you will really learn about the old saying "the only time you can have too much fuel on board is when you are on fire". Plan on at least a 20 knot headwind on some of those westbound trips, and add in the range and time to your alternate, plus a 45 minute (minimum). Suddenly your airplane is much less capable and your normal 700 nm range requires a fuel stop somewhere between A and B, or GA and TX . Fuel starvation is still a leading cause of accidents. Buying big enough tanks for your mission helps your odds. Denny |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Best homebuilt for ~700 nm commute
On Jul 7, 4:35 pm, es330td wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:04 pm, John Smith wrote: es330td wrote: My mission requirements are a 700 nm range with reserve and a flight time under 4 hours facing occasional IMC weather as I will be flying between GA and east Texas. I'd also prefer something with as low a fuel burn as possible for cost savings. Michael Henry wrote: Vans RV-7 -http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv-7int.htm Vans RV-8 also meets the speed and range requirements but as a tandem may not have enough panel space for IFR. I would recommend a Van's RV for several reasons: - excellent builder support along your route (RV builders area everywhere) - excellent aircraft for high-speed cruise, low fuel consumption, low-airspeed takeoffs and landings at short fields, providing more options IIRC, there are more RV's out there than any other homebuilt. Before I posted I checked out the -7 but was a little concerned about the range. According to AIRNAV, the distance between my airports of interest is 684 nm direct and my path takes me through/around the general aviator's Hell that is Hartsfield-Jackson. They aren't always accomodating to GA IFR pilots and will route you all over the place. Depending on whether I am coming or going, if I am VFR I can just cancel and fly under the class B or file a pop-up IFR but if I have to take off or land in IMC I have to let them send me where they will. With a 775 sm range at 75% power on the -7 I start running into problems of getting low on fuel and pushing into my reserve if the flight encounters any kind of rerouting. I can, of course, slow down but now I start getting over 4 hours and given that a lot of my flying would be early evening I'd rather not push myself. I'm not scratching any reasonable plane off my list just yet; in fact, this doesn't become viable until I get my IFR ticket which is at least a year off. It doesn't hurt to start educating myself because I can always start building even before I am ready for cross country commuting. What about adding additional tanks for the commute? After all it is experimental Lou |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An Icy Commute | Michelle P | Piloting | 12 | December 7th 05 03:50 AM |
Fox Homebuilt | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | December 3rd 05 01:58 AM |
Big guy considering a homebuilt... | Rutger | Home Built | 3 | August 11th 04 05:57 PM |
OT? write-offs for business commute | Chad Munroe | General Aviation | 10 | January 16th 04 01:02 AM |
OT? write-offs for business commute | Chad Munroe | Piloting | 8 | January 16th 04 01:02 AM |