A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OLC statistics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 23rd 10, 11:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
brianDG303[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 161
Default OLC statistics

I flew with several much more advanced pilots on Saturday, 4 hours in
100% ridge lift, very turbulent, very rough terrain (North Cascades WA
State), very cool. Afterwords it was pointed out to me that my Rate Of
Climb statistic was 1/2 of everyone else, although I was keeping up
altitude wise. Is there an explanation somewhere of what is being
measured, and is there a way of using it as a training tool?

Thanks all,

Brian


  #2  
Old March 24th 10, 03:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default OLC statistics

brianDG303 wrote:
I flew with several much more advanced pilots on Saturday, 4 hours in
100% ridge lift, very turbulent, very rough terrain (North Cascades WA
State), very cool. Afterwords it was pointed out to me that my Rate Of
Climb statistic was 1/2 of everyone else, although I was keeping up
altitude wise. Is there an explanation somewhere of what is being
measured, and is there a way of using it as a training tool?

Your trace is much flatter than the other pilots (Brad and John), as if
you were staying near the top of lift where the climb rate is weak. They
appeared to wander around more, sometimes getting lower, then climbing
back up in the lower, stronger lift that is usually the case for ridge
soaring.

If you have a statistic like this when thermal soaring, then it's time
to worry!

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (netto to net to email me)

- "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl

- "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz

  #3  
Old March 24th 10, 03:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Greg Arnold[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default OLC statistics

On 3/23/2010 4:39 PM, brianDG303 wrote:
I flew with several much more advanced pilots on Saturday, 4 hours in
100% ridge lift, very turbulent, very rough terrain (North Cascades WA
State), very cool. Afterwords it was pointed out to me that my Rate Of
Climb statistic was 1/2 of everyone else, although I was keeping up
altitude wise. Is there an explanation somewhere of what is being
measured, and is there a way of using it as a training tool?

Thanks all,

Brian



I am not sure that the Average Climb statistic is very meaningful when
you are running the ridge. If you compare your OLC-League speed (over
the fastest 2 1/2 hours), you will see that you were not terribly slower
than two of the other pilots. Speed is the best statistic of all.




  #4  
Old March 25th 10, 05:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Brad[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 722
Default OLC statistics

On Mar 23, 8:39*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
brianDG303 wrote:
I flew with several much more advanced pilots on Saturday, 4 hours in
100% ridge lift, very turbulent, very rough terrain (North Cascades WA
State), very cool. Afterwords it was pointed out to me that my Rate Of
Climb statistic was 1/2 of everyone else, although I was keeping up
altitude wise. Is there an explanation somewhere of what is being
measured, and is there a way of using it as a training tool?


Your trace is much flatter than the other pilots (Brad and John), *as if
you were staying near the top of lift where the climb rate is weak. They
appeared to wander around more, sometimes getting lower, then climbing
back up in the lower, stronger lift that is usually the case for ridge
soaring.

If you have a statistic like this when thermal soaring, then it's time
to worry!

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (netto to net to email me)

- "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarmhttp://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl

- "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz


As one of the pilots flying with Brian that day, I'll make a few
comments. It was not all ridge lift. There were thermals that came
through at times and in certain places. There were also places where
very localized surges of strong lift would come through, and I have no
idea what the source was, but to stay in the lift you had to circle
really tight, but climb rates at times were over 6kts on the averager.

We're pretty sure there was the type of wave that seems to be common
in this area we fly. Several of us have experienced it over the years,
it is alway a real blast when we get the right conditions, and we're
very lucky to have a club towplane and towpilots that are available
when the conditions are good.

Brad
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sales statistics Oliver Arend Home Built 2 August 29th 09 05:49 PM
OLC Statistics [email protected] Soaring 1 April 20th 09 01:38 AM
FLARM Statistics John Galloway Soaring 40 October 14th 06 10:58 PM
Accident statistics Marc Adler Piloting 60 September 30th 06 08:29 AM
Pilot statistics: SSA vs non-SSA DrJack Soaring 6 March 10th 04 05:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.