If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?)
I have been following the thread about "How high is that cloud", and quite a
few of the posters seems to have some misconceptions about lapse rate. Some of you, especially, are comparing apples and oranges: The *environmental lapse rate* is a measurement of the real atmosphere. The *dry adiabatic* and *wet adiabatic* lapse rates are scientific laws. Be sure that you understand the difference. We use the laws to only estimate the temperature of an air parcel of known temperature-dewpoint properties, should it get lifted a specified number of feet in the *real* atmosphere. That estimate of the bubble's temperature, only when compared to the temperature of the actual environment at that level, will help us to determine the stability. The lurid details below: ------- 1. The real atmosphe Its temperature changes with height; this is the *Environmental Lapse Rate*; it can be such that the temperature is lower at higher altitudes (normal, and commonly measured in degrees per thousand feet, or similar); temperature can be higher with increases in altitude (inversion); it can even not change with changes in altitude (isothermal). The rate of change (in degrees per thousand feet) can change from one layer to another. We know that Performance varies with atmospheres of different properties, so ICAO came up with a hypothetical *Standard* atmosphere so that we can compare. In this hypothetical atmosphere, the Temperature at Sea level is 15 deg C, and the temperature drops off at about 1.98 (let's call it 2) deg C per 1000 feet. The 2 degrees C per 1000 can be considered an *average* of a large number of real atmospheres, but is only occasionally representative of any particular single atmosphere, and especially not over all layers of it. 2. A hypothetical bubble of air: whose dew point is lower than its temperature, and which does not mix with the surrounding air: When such a bubble is *lifted*, the pressure on it decreases and it cools. No heat is added nor released, hence *adiabatic*. Such a bubble will cool at just about 3 degrees C per 1000 feet. This is more or less constant at all pressures (hence at all levels), but remember: it will be 3 deg per 1000 *only as long as the dew point remains lower than the temperature*. Once the temperature cools to the point of the dew point, the rules change...see 3, below. The rate of cooling is called the "dry adiabatic lapse rate". Note that the *Environmental lapse rate* is a *difference in the temperature* from one layer of the real atmosphere compared to another. The "dry adiabatic lapse rate" does not measure anything in the real atmosphere at all. It is a known *rate of cooling* should a parcel of air be lifted to lower pressure (or rate of warming should it be lowered to higher pressure. 3. The same hypothetical bubble of air as in number 2.: but now with the temperature equal to the dewpoint: When such a bubble is lifted it tries to cool as per 2, above. But it cannot cool much below the dew point, so the dewpoint has to decrease also. The only way the dewpoint can decrease, is if some of the water vapour leaves the air, and becomes real water (cloud droplets, fog droplets). Heat is released in the process of condensing into water and that heat is used to warm the bubble somewhat.... now it cannot cool at 3 degrees per 1000, but somewhat less. This is known as the "wet adiabatic lapse rate". Once again, it does not measure the real atmosphere, it is a "rate of cooling" should a bubble with Temperature-equal-to-dewpoint start to rise to lower pressures. How much cooling, depends on how much water condenses to release heat... Since the most moisture condenses from air that is at very high dewpoints, that is the sort of bubble that will cool the slowest, say about 1 deg C per 1000. In very cold arctic air with dewpoints of minus 30, there is hardly any more moisture, so very little heat is added in condensation, and such a bubble cools very nearly at 3 degrees per 1000, almost the same as a *dry* bubble. In the real atmosphere, *environmental* lapse rates of greater than 3 degrees per 1000 are rare, because they are *absolutely* unstable... any small lift of a parcel would be automatically warmer than the surrounding air. If conditions are ripe to try to achieve such a steep (3-degree per 1000) *environmental* lapse rate.... hot summer afternoons.... the self-induced mixing will create a near-3-degree-per-1000 lapse rate. What will happen is an immediate mixing... bringing cooler upper air down, and convection of the warmer lower air upward.... The *environmental* lapse rate will stabilize right around the 3-degree per 1000 rate in the surface layer. How deep can this layer be? Depends on the strength (angle) of the sun, the length of the day and few other things, such as the type of surface.... but it will be rarely more than 6,000 feet in most areas. I am not too familiar with deserts so it may be a bit more there, but I would still estimate well short of 10,000 feet. Above this surface layer, the *environmental* lapse rate typically is considerably less than 3 degrees per thousand feet, perhaps more like somewhere around the "standard" 2 deg per 1000. Therefore, if we tried to lift a *bubble*, say from 8000 to 10000 feet (and its dewpoint is lower than temperature), it will cool at 3 degree per 1000, but after a 2000 foot lift it will likely be considerable cooler than the environment and will sink back (stable). The most common scenario is a high-dewpoint bubble near the surface is lifted convectively. If the boundary layer's lapse rate is near 3 deg C per 1000, the bubble will not be particularly unstable, because it will cool at 3 deg per 1000, and be very nearly the same temperature as the environment. But if the bubble has a high dewpoint, and the temperature cools to the point where water has to condense, *thereafter* it will cool at only about 1 degree per 1000. *NOW* it stands a good chance of being warmer than the environment and hence unstable. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 03:35 AM |
High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |