|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
March 20th 13, 10:12 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
We don't need no steenkeeng one-man rig
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:42:18 PM UTC-6, Ralph Jones wrote:
Actually the guns, which accounted for about 350 lb per wing, wouldn't have been installed until after assembly. Yep. I tried to say just the mounting hardware not the guns themselves but I wasn't clear. The gun mounting hardware is heavy. I found a reference saying each P-47 blade weighed 110 Lbs so maybe 500 lbs including the hub. That's still a lot for those guys to be lifting as high as they did. Greatest generation indeed. 
|
|
#12
March 21st 13, 04:45 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
|
We don't need no steenkeeng one-man rig
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:44:01 PM UTC+1, Bill D wrote:
That P-47 wing had a self-sealing fuel tank, 4, .50 cal gun mounts with ammunition trays and numerous hard points for bombs and rockets. It also had a main gear leg to support all that weight. The fuselage had pilot armor and heavy vacuum tube avionics. "Civilianized" WWII fighters often weighed a ton less than the GI versions after they were stripped of the mil-stuff.. Minor detail - P-47s didn't get internal wing tanks until the late-war P-47N model. If this is a C, it wouldn't even have wing bomb/drop tank racks. Still a big hunk of metal! Kirk 66
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
