If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 06:32:31 -0700, wrote: /G Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:56:15 -0700, wrote: It was a both a typo and a misunderstanding about 146 boxes when I made the original post. One of my sources pointed out after my initial posting that 146 boxes were good to go absent WAAS NOTAMs. My purpose of having made the posting was to point out to users of this Usenet group the onnerous requirements just imposed on most IFR GPS users. Now that that's cleared up, do you know which equipment suffix should be used for those with GPS units that are capable of the RNP2 and RNP1 requirements (in order to fly the RNAV SIDS/STARS)? Should we be using /G or /R (assuming no RVSM)? Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAIM errors and the Apollo GPS | Lee Elson | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | July 13th 04 03:12 PM |
RAIM? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 25 | June 10th 04 03:40 PM |
Violating Airspace with GPS | John Bell | Piloting | 57 | November 5th 03 08:25 PM |
RAIM Prediction | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | October 4th 03 03:39 AM |
Big News -- WAAS GPS is Operational for IFR | Lockheed employee | Instrument Flight Rules | 87 | July 30th 03 02:08 AM |