What Is This?

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:33:00 -0500, Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:38:20 -0500, Quaalude wrote in :

32.866436,-114.385992

Yes, thank you I am very aware it is a lat/long. Did anyone actually
search Google Maps/Earth for the view?

I don't know.

I do and did and I have no idea what that runway markings are. They
appear to be painted, not VOR.

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:44:40 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:33:00 -0500, Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:38:20 -0500, Quaalude wrote in :

32.866436,-114.385992

Yes, thank you I am very aware it is a lat/long. Did anyone actually
search Google Maps/Earth for the view?

I don't know.

I do and did and I have no idea what that runway markings are. They
appear to be painted, not VOR.

Yes, not VOR, not a helo, 24 rectangular boxes splined about a central
foci on an accessory runway. ?????

Google Maps provides a better resolution than Earth as does Bing.

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:47:05 -0500, Quaalude wrote:

32.866436,-114.385992

http://youtu.be/j1cqIJcJvh0

Interesting.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2268163/TaxiWay.jpg

My bet? Helicopter (night) landing perhaps?

Tough crowd around here. 0)

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:53:06 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:47:05 -0500, Quaalude wrote:

32.866436,-114.385992

http://youtu.be/j1cqIJcJvh0

Interesting.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2268163/TaxiWay.jpg

My bet? Helicopter (night) landing perhaps?

Tough crowd around here. 0)

Tough but not very sharp. Agree, where did you get the .jpg?

On Mar 4, 9:38*am, Quaalude wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 11:59:24 -0500, Quaalude wrote:
32.866436,-114.385992

Yes, thank you I am very aware it is a lat/long. Did anyone actually
search Google Maps/Earth for the view?

that's not what you asked, idiot. you asked what those numbers
were. quit being a dick, please.

btw, did you both to say thank you to the ten people who attempted to
answer your apparently poorly worded question?

On Mar 4, 10:47*am, Quaalude wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:44:40 -0500, Sam wrote:
On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:33:00 -0500, Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:38:20 -0500, Quaalude wrote in :

32.866436,-114.385992

Yes, thank you I am very aware it is a lat/long. Did anyone actually
search Google Maps/Earth for the view?

I don't know.

I do and did and I have no idea what that runway markings are. They
appear to be painted, not VOR.

Yes, not VOR, not a helo, 24 rectangular boxes splined about a central
foci on an accessory runway. *?????

Google Maps provides a better resolution than Earth as does Bing.

you ask a question and then get ****ty..? do you get a *lot* of good
responses that way?

here's a thought - since you knew you were sending everyone off on a
stupid rabbit hunt anyway - why not say in your OP, "I found something
that looks odd sitting on an unused runway in Yuma - anyone
know..?" VASTLY different than being the jerk you are now, and the
first 10 replies would have been to your true question, instead of
wasted trying to figure out WTH you really wanted to know.

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:55:15 -0500, Quaalude wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:53:06 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:47:05 -0500, Quaalude wrote:

32.866436,-114.385992

http://youtu.be/j1cqIJcJvh0

Interesting.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2268163/TaxiWay.jpg

My bet? Helicopter (night) landing perhaps?

Tough crowd around here. 0)

Tough but not very sharp. Agree, where did you get the .jpg?

GE Pro+ and my NASA account.

On 3/4/2012 12:47 PM, Quaalude wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:44:40 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:33:00 -0500, Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:38:20 -0500, wrote :

32.866436,-114.385992

Yes, thank you I am very aware it is a lat/long. Did anyone actually
search Google Maps/Earth for the view?

I don't know.

I do and did and I have no idea what that runway markings are. They
appear to be painted, not VOR.

Yes, not VOR, not a helo, 24 rectangular boxes splined about a central
foci on an accessory runway. ?????

Google Maps provides a better resolution than Earth as does Bing.

How about you worded your question poorly? You didn't ask what the
image is. You just gave a series of numbers and asked what the are. You
were told several times. If you had asked what the picture shows you
might have received a better answer.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:55:48 -0800 (PST), Gordon wrote:

stupid rabbit hunt anyway -

Uh-oh.

Someone just made a fool out of themselves. larf

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:55:31 -0800 (PST), Gordon wrote:

btw, did you both to say thank you to the ten people who attempted to
answer your apparently poorly worded question?

You're an asshole but I feel in the Easter mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar,
an self-exposed idiot, a ****horse and a dickhead.

The second includes only those who have never heard of you.

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh out loud at you, and any of the second group who
see that **** of yours and will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.