If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
There is a difference between (1) serving as pilot in command, (2) acting as
pilot in command, and (3) logging pilot in command. The last two apply to part 91 operations. Logging pic and acting as pic are not related. Simon AWP-FSDO-SDL |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
There is a difference between (1) serving as pilot in command, (2) acting as pilot in command, and (3) logging pilot in command. Ok, what's the difference between (1) and (2)? Jose (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Acting as pilot in command is the situation where the pilot is (in his or
her mind) the pilot in command. Logging is independant of acting, you are correct, in the USA there is a tenuous relationship betwee the two. Serving as pilot in command does not apply to part 91 operations, as I mentioned in the relevant post. It is a concept used in air carrier regulatory parts, and may include time serving as (rated but not yet fully qualified) pic (as in incomplete IOE) when someone else, such as an IOE check airman, is THE pic, and this time applies to things like high minimums. That is a very short summary and does not include the exceptions, wherefores, herinafters, limited to's, and so on. I include it because it provides a more complete picture of the concepts discussed. Fly safe Simon AWP-FSDO-SDL |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon" wrote
Acting as pilot in command is the situation where the pilot is (in his or her mind) the pilot in command. Logging is independant of acting, you are correct, in the USA there is a tenuous relationship betwee the two. Serving as pilot in command does not apply to part 91 operations, as I mentioned in the relevant post. It is a concept used in air carrier regulatory parts, and may include time serving as (rated but not yet fully qualified) pic (as in incomplete IOE) when someone else, such as an IOE check airman, is THE pic, and this time applies to things like high minimums. That is a very short summary and does not include the exceptions, wherefores, herinafters, limited to's, and so on. I include it because it provides a more complete picture of the concepts discussed. I think that you still have your words mixed-up. Quoting from FAR 121 concerning Operating Experience: "Section 121.434: Operating experience, operating cycles, and consolidation of knowledge and skills. (a) No certificate holder may use a person nor may any person serve as a required crewmember of an airplane unless the person has satisfactorily completed, on that type airplane and in that crewmember position, the operating experience, operating cycles, and the line operating flight time for consolidation of knowledge and skills, required by this section, except as follows: (1) Crewmembers other than pilots in command may serve as provided herein for the purpose of meeting the requirements of this section. (2) Pilots who are meeting the pilot in command requirements MAY SERVE AS SECOND-IN-COMMAND. (c) Pilot crewmembers must acquire operating experience and operating cycles as follows: (1) A pilot in command must -- (i) PERFORM THE DUTIES of a pilot in command under the supervision of a check pilot;" No instance of "acting as pilot-in-command" was found in Part 121. Bob Moore ATP B-707 B-727 PanAm (retired) |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
I agree. Serving is a 121 concept. Acting is a part 91 concept which applies
to 121 also. The 61.51 provision for logging pic while acting as pic for those operations requiring the use of an ATP is one such example where acting as pic applies to 121. My point was not that acting applied to 121 but that serving was a third category of pic. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon" wrote in message
... I agree. Do you? [...] My point was not that acting applied to 121 but that serving was a third category of pic. Hmmm...it seems that you don't agree after all. "Serving" is not a category of PIC at all. Pete |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
My impression from this discussion is that "serving" as PIC (while not "acting"
as PIC) is sort of like being able to log PIC time when you are solo and not yet a private pilot. You're not rated, but you are doing the things you would be doing if you were. Jose (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 22:04:54 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: "Simon" wrote in message ... I agree. Do you? [...] My point was not that acting applied to 121 but that serving was a third category of pic. Hmmm...it seems that you don't agree after all. "Serving" is not a category of PIC at all. To me only one thing matters...It only takes Airplane, Single Engine Land for some one to fly as safety pilot with me in my high performance/complex/retract. It's up to them how they log it. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) Pete |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
a good philosophy.
G3ROW WB7ULT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
AF investigators cite pilot error in fighter crash | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 09:55 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |