If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Crouch Strap story
I sent the following to our magazine nine months ago and didn't receive an
acknowledgement or receipt. I guess it was not suitable for them so I thought I would share it with ras to maybe provoke some safety discussion. efb10-11-03-rev.6-5-04 You may be interested in my latest crotch strap experience. I'm still analyzing my June 2003 accident and the cause. More later on this. The role of the crotch strap is significant and worthy of mention. The last half dozen gliders I've had I added a crotch strap (usually available from Wings & Wheels), which easily clicks into the bottom, front or 5th slot of the standard Gadringer belt hardware. I secure the other end, which terminates with the belt into a triangular link, with a quarter inch hole that I bolt to the seat pan with a large "wood" washer behind the seat pan. My gliders are Experimental category so this is legal. I always heard that the main purpose of a crotch strap was to keep the lap belt across the upper thighs and prevent it sliding up to the stomach area. I have since learned better. It of course depends on the direction of the accident loads and the direction of the inertia of the body as to how all restraint straps come into play. Many glider accidents involve "dropping in" vertically wherein the tailbone (in the L-1, L-2 area) or higher are damaged so the belts don't help much. You seldom see accidents with lap belt overload, but it happens. I have a sad memory of helping remove a dead friend from an inverted Ventus cockpit where the lap belts on both sides had pulled lose from the seat pan. Fortunately rare but it happens. In my "incident" the nose of the glider hit hard ground at about a 60 plus degree angle. The "load" was about along the longitudinal axis of the glider. Since in our modern gliders (ASW-28 in my case) we recline (sit supine), the inertia of my body was toward the nose with only the crotch strap to resist. Actually Waibel designed the seat pan to take some of this forward load against the bottom of the thighs. In this seating the knees are bent more upward. The nose of the glider (along with my feet) was crushed in a calculated energy-absorbing manner. Thank you Gerhardt Waibel! I think his design and the crotch strap saved my knees. I was conscious and lucid until the helicopter dropped me off at the Medical College of Georgia Trauma Center. After that I really was not with it for a couple of weeks, but after that time I suddenly noticed that my groin area was still quite swollen. I realized that my crotch area had sustained a significant load and that all things considered had kept my body from moving more forward and no doubt helped minimize the leg/knee damage. I had no shoulder strap or lap belt marks or soreness. Since my guess is that a significant number of glider accidents impose loads and body reactions similar to mine, I recommend a crotch strap. Trying to distribute the load to the pelvic area by wearing an athletic "cup" may be good for some flights, but for some flights there are other disadvantages. Many contest pilots regularly wear a male external catheter and I don't think both would work. With just the crotch strap I always had to be careful that the strap was adjusted somewhat to the right, was not too tight, and did not interfere with the flow from the catheter that was to the left. I suggest reading Chip Bearden's posting which appeared in the rec.aviation.soaring newsgroup on Nov.20 1998 which outlines a more complex but better seat belt design. I hope this discussion will create more thought about glider accident safety. Ed Byars |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You may be interested in my latest crotch strap experience.
I'm still analyzing my June 2003 accident and the cause. More later on this. The role of the crotch strap is significant and worthy of mention. Dr. Byars, thank you for this interesting and important feedback based on real world experience. The standard line from the German manufactures is that a crotch strap is not needed because the submarining hazard has been taken care of through use of the "H point" when locating the anchoring point of the lap belts. This system locates the lap belt a bit further forward than in older designs with the aim being to get the lap belt lower on your hips. This is supposed to prevent it from being pulled out of place when tightening the shoulder harness. It does, but I believe the lap belt has to be tightened to an un-necessary degree to get anywhere near the effect the "H point" is credited with bringing about. My experience is that the "H point" is not adequate to keep the lap belt from being pulled up when tightening the shoulder straps. This is especially true when flying out west in strong lift at high speed. A crotch strap helps keep you from bouncing around thus providing more comfort and better control. The difference is security in the cockpit is dramatic. I normally retro fit a crotch strap to my gliders and feel a lot safer and more comfortable with its use. This holds true even with my Genesis which used the "H point" system to locate the lap belt anchor points. Robert Mudd |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Robertmudd1u" wrote in message ... You may be interested in my latest crotch strap experience. I'm still analyzing my June 2003 accident and the cause. More later on this. The role of the crotch strap is significant and worthy of mention. Dr. Byars, thank you for this interesting and important feedback based on real world experience. The standard line from the German manufactures is that a crotch strap is not needed because the submarining hazard has been taken care of through use of the "H point" when locating the anchoring point of the lap belts. This system locates the lap belt a bit further forward than in older designs with the aim being to get the lap belt lower on your hips. This is supposed to prevent it from being pulled out of place when tightening the shoulder harness. It does, but I believe the lap belt has to be tightened to an un-necessary degree to get anywhere near the effect the "H point" is credited with bringing about. My experience is that the "H point" is not adequate to keep the lap belt from being pulled up when tightening the shoulder straps. This is especially true when flying out west in strong lift at high speed. A crotch strap helps keep you from bouncing around thus providing more comfort and better control. The difference is security in the cockpit is dramatic. I normally retro fit a crotch strap to my gliders and feel a lot safer and more comfortable with its use. This holds true even with my Genesis which used the "H point" system to locate the lap belt anchor points. Robert Mudd After reading Ed and Robert's posts, I intend to install a crotch strap in my Nimbus. At the very least, it will let me get the shoulder straps REALLY tight without pulling the lap belt up too high. When you are riding 10 - 15 knot mountain thermals with a stiff carbon wing you just can't be strapped in too tight. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Robertmudd1u" wrote in message ... You may be interested in my latest crotch strap experience. I'm still analyzing my June 2003 accident and the cause. More later on this. The role of the crotch strap is significant and worthy of mention. Dr. Byars, thank you for this interesting and important feedback based on real world experience. The standard line from the German manufactures is that a crotch strap is not needed because the submarining hazard has been taken care of through use of the "H point" when locating the anchoring point of the lap belts. This system locates the lap belt a bit further forward than in older designs with the aim being to get the lap belt lower on your hips. This is supposed to prevent it from being pulled out of place when tightening the shoulder harness. It does, but I believe the lap belt has to be tightened to an un-necessary degree to get anywhere near the effect the "H point" is credited with bringing about. My experience is that the "H point" is not adequate to keep the lap belt from being pulled up when tightening the shoulder straps. This is especially true when flying out west in strong lift at high speed. A crotch strap helps keep you from bouncing around thus providing more comfort and better control. The difference is security in the cockpit is dramatic. I normally retro fit a crotch strap to my gliders and feel a lot safer and more comfortable with its use. This holds true even with my Genesis which used the "H point" system to locate the lap belt anchor points. Robert Mudd After reading Ed and Robert's posts, I intend to install a crotch strap in my Nimbus. At the very least, it will let me get the shoulder straps REALLY tight without pulling the lap belt up too high. When you are riding 10 - 15 knot mountain thermals with a stiff carbon wing you just can't be strapped in too tight. Bill Daniels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Robertmudd1u
writes You may be interested in my latest crotch strap experience. I'm still analyzing my June 2003 accident and the cause. More later on this. The role of the crotch strap is significant and worthy of mention. Dr. Byars, thank you for this interesting and important feedback based on real world experience. The standard line from the German manufactures is that a crotch strap is not needed because the submarining hazard has been taken care of through use of the "H point" when locating the anchoring point of the lap belts. This system locates the lap belt a bit further forward than in older designs with the aim being to get the lap belt lower on your hips. This is supposed to prevent it from being pulled out of place when tightening the shoulder harness. It does, but I believe the lap belt has to be tightened to an un-necessary degree to get anywhere near the effect the "H point" is credited with bringing about. Quite. If you could predict exactly when you were going to crash, and correctly tighten up your straps beforehand, this might work. But with sometimes hurried field landing decisions the "pre-prepared crash scenario" is just not realistic. Also, from other postings in this thread, the four point harness does not seem to be very good in high turbulence. My experience is that the "H point" is not adequate to keep the lap belt from being pulled up when tightening the shoulder straps. This is especially true when flying out west in strong lift at high speed. A crotch strap helps keep you from bouncing around thus providing more comfort and better control. The difference is security in the cockpit is dramatic. I normally retro fit a crotch strap to my gliders and feel a lot safer and more comfortable with its use. This holds true even with my Genesis which used the "H point" system to locate the lap belt anchor points. Robert, I entirely agree with you and Ed Byars that a fifth (crotch, if you like) strap is invaluable in a number of situations. In my military flying, a five-point harness was normal and I spent many hours wearing one, normally as part of Martin Baker ejection seats of various types. Turning to gliding, some 10 years ago another pilot at Lasham ordered a German glider and wanted 5-point harnesses fitted during build. The maker refused to fit them "because it has been shown that the fifth strap is dangerous". When pressed, they quoted a report done by a car (automobile) test organisation in Germany on five-point harnesses that suggested that some damage might occur to the crotch area in the case of a severe impact. Possible damage to the male genitals was also mentioned, and this seems to have had a major impact (no pun intended!) on people's thoughts about the fifth strap. However, my view was that in a major crash, if the fifth strap caused some soreness afterwards but prevented "submarining" of the body under the lap straps, then it could reduce damage to the legs or even save the life of the pilot. It is all very well raising emotional points about sore genitals. The real point IMHO is in a crash in which life is at stake or there is the possibility of the pilot becoming a paraplegic. What is the best option to minimise these awful results in a critical "life-or-death" crash situation? To put it crudely, would you rather have a sore crutch for a short while, or be dead, or in a wheelchair for the rest of your life? In any case, the "sore crutch" effect may not be there after all, see the next para. I was supported in my view by Dr Peter Saundby, the medical advisor to the BGA, a qualified flight surgeon and an RAF jet pilot himself. He pointed out that an important function of the fifth strap was to keep the major load-bearing lap straps from riding up too high, even if they had slackened off during flight. The lap straps then stood a good chance of taking the large crash loads for which they are designed, and any tendency to "submarine" under them would be minimised. Peter and I were able to interest Dr Tony Segal, a UK glider pilot and graduate of the UK Aero Medical (Flight Surgeon) course with the RAF at Farnborough. Tony had already made glider crash tests using redundant cockpit sections. He then managed to interest the UK Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) in the crashworthiness of four and five point harnesses. Tests were carried out at the UK Defence site at Farnborough using instrumented human dummies seated in mock-ups of glider cockpits and the impact test track of the Centre for Human Sciences (CHS) at Farnborough. The glider cockpit was modelled around a Nimbus 3. An unclassified report was published. This was also presented to the gliding scientific organisation OSTIV during their meeting at Bayreuth, Germany, in August 1999 and no doubt will be available in full from OSTIV (OSTIV = Organisation Scientifique et Technique Internationale de Vol a Voile). As far as I know, this paper is probably the most definitive recent work on the subject and would probably answer most of the points raised in this thread. Here are some details: Title: Four and Five Point Glider Seat Harnesses - Static and Dynamic Tests Authors Dr Anthony M Segal, Lasham Gliding Society, UK Leslie P Neil, Senior Engineer Impact Protection, UK DERA Graham A Reece, Instrumentation Engineer, UK DERA Philip G Murtha, Impact Test Track Engineer, UK DERA The paper is 20 pages long but para 5b is worth quoting in full (QRF = Quick Release Fastening, that is, the harness release box):: "5 b) Observations After the Impact Test When a 5 point harness was being tested, both with the harness tight and with the harness slack, the lap straps remained in the correct position over the hip bones. The QRF also stayed in the correct position. When a 4 point harness was being tested, both with the harness tight and with the harness lose, the lap straps were seen to have moved up over the abdomen until they were jammed tightly under the lower rib margin. The QRF had moved upwards until it was in the epigastrium (the "pit of the stomach"). This is very serious, because severe, even fatal injury may be caused to the internal organs in the upper abdomen. THIS IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FINDING OF THE ENTIRE TEST. Following the impact test, with a 4 point harness, the shoulder straps were seen to be hanging loosely between the seat back and the pilot dummy's shoulders. This was due to the upward movement of the lap straps and the QRF." Finally, the conclusion includes the following words: "A 5-point harness is superior to a 4-point harness in an accident impact situation and also under conditions of negative-g. This is especially so if the harness is slack." It also goes on to say: "It is recommended that the 5th strap be designed to avoid injury to the crotch of the pilot. This design of strap should be fitted to new gliders and be retro-fitted (where structurally feasible) to gliders in current use". ------------------------------- The above seems pretty conclusive to me and in my syndicate glider we had a fifth (crotch) strap fitted in the rear cockpit. We were told that in the front cockpit there was not a proper hard point to which a fifth strap could be fixed. Maybe with some minor structural strengthening it could be, this thread has reminded me that we ought to investigate it. -- Ian Strachan Lasham Gliding Centre, UK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tony Segal published a later article, which concluded six point
harnesses were superior to five point harnesses. I'll bet they are but does this not provide two more straps to un-fasten when the need for a quick egress arises? Or am I missing something? Robert Mudd |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
It is possible to make a 6 point harness that simply falls away when
released. Some were trialled in Europe and the UK I believe . The plusses for a six point harness outweighed the negatives by a long way! I was trying to get hold of one but they appear to not have been able to get them certified. It is very difficult to innovate in the aviation industry without spending vast amounts of money and I think this vital innovation may have fallen foul of this. Perhaps DG offers this as an option? They seem to be the only real innovaters left on the soaring scene. Ian "Robertmudd1u" wrote in message ... Tony Segal published a later article, which concluded six point harnesses were superior to five point harnesses. I'll bet they are but does this not provide two more straps to un-fasten when the need for a quick egress arises? Or am I missing something? Robert Mudd |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Robertmudd1u" wrote in message ... Tony Segal published a later article, which concluded six point harnesses were superior to five point harnesses. I'll bet they are but does this not provide two more straps to un-fasten when the need for a quick egress arises? Or am I missing something? Robert Mudd Hi Robert.... All the belts on my SCHROTH harness disconnect when the release is punched on the buckle/latch. The operating mechanism's are very user friendly and are meant to be operated by excited people wearing gloves who are probably on fire. I wouldn't be worried in the least about the possibility of entanglements. All connections happen at the buckle/latch, one place to hookup and/or release. ABSOLUTELY BULLETPROOF and completely reliable. If I were to hazard a guess, I'd bet that the motorsport standards exceed the TSO for aircraft belts by a very wide margin. Scott Correa |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Further to my posting yesterday I have identified the
6 point harness in our Std Cirrus as as Luke PRO6F designed for single seat race cars. See: http://www.lukeracing.co.uk/rec.php?cat=17 Flying with it today was the most comfortable I have ever been in a glider as I felt totally secured with the lap strap held low and no tendency to slide forward in the seat pan with the lap strap rising as happens in so many gliders. Even a deep seat pan like the front seat of a Duo comes nowhere near in terms to achieving that feeling. It may be non approved but I really don't care as the benefits for comfort and safety are so clear cut. John Galloway |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
eScrew zen story | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | December 20th 04 07:19 AM |
Funny story about naval | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 20th 04 03:37 AM |
Funny story about piloting | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | December 20th 04 12:34 AM |
Amazing, True Story and Lessons | jsmith | Piloting | 5 | March 24th 04 03:32 PM |
PFC Lynch gets a Bronze Star? | Brian | Military Aviation | 77 | August 2nd 03 11:15 AM |