|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 25th 03, 02:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Newer is not necessarily better.
As far as handling goes, I am fully convinced the rapid roll rate of the Grumman saved my butt one day last summer at an uncontrolled field in an "encounter" with a very aerobatic NORDO Pitts in a very very unstandard pattern. "Satellite" wrote in message m... I don't get into an older than 20 year plane! And what are you telling me here? Are you trying to do some loops and steep turns? Any plane racing in your future? Handling better - for what? Newer is better - PERIOD. "Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message .net... Fly a Tiger and then come back and tell me it handles like a Cessna. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
