V-22 Osprey Is One System The Military Needs Right Now.

V-22 Osprey Is One System The Military Needs Right Now.
Lexington Institute.
http://lexingtoninstitute.org/998.shtml

V-22 Osprey Is One System The Military Needs Right Now
Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D.
Issue Brief
Oct 4, 2006
Print Page

The Bush Administration is projecting that defense spending will fall
from four percent of the economy today to three percent at the
beginning of the next decade. In the past, such declines have hit
procurement accounts harder than other types of spending, because it is
easier to delay new weapons than it is to cut military pay, healthcare
benefits and operational outlays. The services have already begun
trimming their weapons programs. For example, the Air Force wants to
end production of the C-17, its only modern jet airlifter, while the
Navy and Marine Corps have proposed deleting 169 planes from their
2008-2013 spending plans.
Against this backdrop, critics are complaining that some of the weapons
being developed by the services don't seem to have much to do with
winning the global war on terrorism. Programs like the Joint Strike
Fighter and the Navy's next-generation destroyer may be needed to
counter future conventional threats, the critics say, but right now all
the threats seem to be unconventional -- terrorists, insurgents,
weapons traffickers and so on. The critics have a point, especially
given how poorly the fight seems to be going in Iraq and Afghanistan.

However, there is at least one new military system about to enter the
force that is relevant right now, and badly needed in places like Iraq.
That is the Marine Corps' V-22 Osprey, the world's first operational
tilt-rotor aircraft. A tilt-rotor combines the vertical agility of
helicopters with the speed and range of fixed-wing planes, providing
unique versatility. It not only can land anywhere -- on mountains, in
jungles, on storm-tossed ships -- but it can get to such places even
when they are far, far away, because the Osprey has a range of over a
thousand miles. In other words, you can fly a V-22 from Washington to
New Orleans without stopping for fuel, not a mission you'd want to
attempt with a regular helicopter. A fixed-wing airplane can make that
trip also, but if the runways in the Big Easy are flooded, it can't
land. A V-22 can make the trip and land, wherever there is a dry spot
of ground.

It doesn't require a degree from Professor Rumsfeld's School for the
Truly Transformational to figure out that this a special capability,
one well-suited to a world of irregular warfare, unconventional
threats, and homeland disasters. In fact, the Marine Corps figured it
out a generation ago, and has stuck with the Osprey through a rocky
development effort reminiscent of the trials faced a generation earlier
by the helicopters it will replace. But the Osprey was vindicated last
year in a very successful operational evaluation, and it will be
deployed to Iraq next year. The Marine Corps plans to produce 21
V-22's in 2008 and 30 per year in each of the following five years. A
gee-whiz special-operations version for the Air Force will be fielded
in 2009.

As the Osprey enters the force in the years ahead, planners in the Army
and other services are going to be kicking themselves that they didn't
invest more in tilt-rotors. Why buy conventional twin-engine
turboprops to carry cargo to remote bases when you can carry three tons
of supplies 500 miles, and not even need a runway once you arrive? Why
struggle to trade off the advantages of a helicopter versus an airplane
in conducting difficult combat missions when a single airframe combines
the best qualities of both? In the fight for relevance the V-22 is a
clear winner, and the only question is why it took so long for some
experts to figure that out.

the V-22 Osprey should've been in full-scale production and service a
decade ago, along with so many other military systems.


Mike wrote:
V-22 Osprey Is One System The Military Needs Right Now.
Lexington Institute.
http://lexingtoninstitute.org/998.shtml

V-22 Osprey Is One System The Military Needs Right Now
Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D.
Issue Brief
Oct 4, 2006
Print Page

The Bush Administration is projecting that defense spending will fall
from four percent of the economy today to three percent at the
beginning of the next decade. In the past, such declines have hit
procurement accounts harder than other types of spending, because it is
easier to delay new weapons than it is to cut military pay, healthcare
benefits and operational outlays. The services have already begun
trimming their weapons programs. For example, the Air Force wants to
end production of the C-17, its only modern jet airlifter, while the
Navy and Marine Corps have proposed deleting 169 planes from their
2008-2013 spending plans.
Against this backdrop, critics are complaining that some of the weapons
being developed by the services don't seem to have much to do with
winning the global war on terrorism. Programs like the Joint Strike
Fighter and the Navy's next-generation destroyer may be needed to
counter future conventional threats, the critics say, but right now all
the threats seem to be unconventional -- terrorists, insurgents,
weapons traffickers and so on. The critics have a point, especially
given how poorly the fight seems to be going in Iraq and Afghanistan.

However, there is at least one new military system about to enter the
force that is relevant right now, and badly needed in places like Iraq.
That is the Marine Corps' V-22 Osprey, the world's first operational
tilt-rotor aircraft. A tilt-rotor combines the vertical agility of
helicopters with the speed and range of fixed-wing planes, providing
unique versatility. It not only can land anywhere -- on mountains, in
jungles, on storm-tossed ships -- but it can get to such places even
when they are far, far away, because the Osprey has a range of over a
thousand miles. In other words, you can fly a V-22 from Washington to
New Orleans without stopping for fuel, not a mission you'd want to
attempt with a regular helicopter. A fixed-wing airplane can make that
trip also, but if the runways in the Big Easy are flooded, it can't
land. A V-22 can make the trip and land, wherever there is a dry spot
of ground.

It doesn't require a degree from Professor Rumsfeld's School for the
Truly Transformational to figure out that this a special capability,
one well-suited to a world of irregular warfare, unconventional
threats, and homeland disasters. In fact, the Marine Corps figured it
out a generation ago, and has stuck with the Osprey through a rocky
development effort reminiscent of the trials faced a generation earlier
by the helicopters it will replace. But the Osprey was vindicated last
year in a very successful operational evaluation, and it will be
deployed to Iraq next year. The Marine Corps plans to produce 21
V-22's in 2008 and 30 per year in each of the following five years. A
gee-whiz special-operations version for the Air Force will be fielded
in 2009.

As the Osprey enters the force in the years ahead, planners in the Army
and other services are going to be kicking themselves that they didn't
invest more in tilt-rotors. Why buy conventional twin-engine
turboprops to carry cargo to remote bases when you can carry three tons
of supplies 500 miles, and not even need a runway once you arrive? Why
struggle to trade off the advantages of a helicopter versus an airplane
in conducting difficult combat missions when a single airframe combines
the best qualities of both? In the fight for relevance the V-22 is a
clear winner, and the only question is why it took so long for some
experts to figure that out.